WTF is wrong with people?

Not sure where the classic car bit came from, only report l have seen said an older style pale car :thinking:
Bearing in mind that other reports have said he lived in a council flat and worked at the golf club
it may just be an old non classic perhaps ?
 
Can classic paint be restored using "proper" bird poo proof paint or can only water based carp be used? Does anyone know exactly what the damaged car was? Not that any scenario makes the reaction acceptable or even understandable, just that even slight damage can make a huge difference to some classic cars' values.

I've never had any water based paint marked by bird poo, but the opposite on older cars.

Comment removed. Decided I'll give this thread a miss.
 
Last edited:
In order to try and understand some of the motivation behind this, there is some relevance to it. Never an excuse but some relevance.

People deal with such shocking situations in different ways, I don't think it is fair to immediately label them as utterly disgraceful just because it is different to you @yorkshirechap
 
Last edited:
Not sure where the classic car bit came from, only report l have seen said an older style pale car :thinking:
Bearing in mind that other reports have said he lived in a council flat and worked at the golf club
it may just be an old non classic perhaps ?

from telegraph article posted by OP

quote One theory detectives are thought to be examining is that the assailant was driving a classic car and may have been excessively angered by damage caused in the collision.
 
I don't follow your logic. as everybody knows apart from those who hate cyclists is that cyclists can do no wrong.

Ah sorry it was in response to your comment about a fragile OAP. Should have made that clear. This chap it appears was an active cyclist covering around 150 miloes per week. Hope I'm that fit at that age.

[/QUOTE]
it appears that the other party was driving a classic car in pristine condition - I heard of a Morris Ital being sold for around £14,000 because about the only use it saw was to be driven to the testing station for it's MOT.

If this was the case,(classic car in pristine condition) then "the minor collision" would have devalued the car by £££ which would not be recoverable hence the road rage[/QUOTE]

Can classic paint be restored using "proper" bird poo proof paint or can only water based carp be used? Does anyone know exactly what the damaged car was? Not that any scenario makes the reaction acceptable or even understandable, just that even slight damage can make a huge difference to some classic cars' values.

I can get mine repainted using the original paints, original colour mix (as it's all recorded) by the original painters for around £9k all in, or I can use a local specialist for £6k. If you add in any bodywork damage, then insurance companies are likely to write the car off unless an agreed value.

Whilst being very annoyed if it happened to me and I'd be questioning their ability to drive at an advanced age, it's not worth stabbing anyone over.
 
from telegraph article posted by OP

quote One theory detectives are thought to be examining is that the assailant was driving a classic car and may have been excessively angered by damage caused in the collision.

If that is the reason then he should be put down like a dangerous dog since what's to stop something triggering him again (even if he does spend a long time in jail).
 
I can get mine repainted using the original paints, original colour mix (as it's all recorded) by the original painters for around £9k all in, or I can use a local specialist for £6k. If you add in any bodywork damage, then insurance companies are likely to write the car off unless an agreed value.
If it is only minor damage then only that area needs repairing and painting. The whole car doesn't need painting as any good paint supplier can provide a match to a sample of the existing paintwork which may have changed slightly due to being weathered. Only in the case of chameleon or modern pearlescent paints would there be a need for a total respray.
 
If that is the reason then he should be put down like a dangerous dog since what's to stop something triggering him again (even if he does spend a long time in jail).

Yes but that's not an option is it.
 
If it is only minor damage then only that area needs repairing and painting. The whole car doesn't need painting as any good paint supplier can provide a match to a sample of the existing paintwork which may have changed slightly due to being weathered. Only in the case of chameleon or modern pearlescent paints would there be a need for a total respray.

Unfortunately mine is quite faded and pearlescent. The problem with the older cars is it's actually difficult to match exactly and therefore is noticable, so often a full respray is the only acceptable compromise. Getting the insurance company to agree though...
 
Murder case thread descends into men arguing abut resprays shock
After+watching+the+entire+series+on+netflix+i+m+pretty+sure+_26054670d9ae3d3ed5376cfc90d5ff82.png


"What - WHAT DID YOU SAY!"
:D
 
And then there's those who think having satellite navigation is a substitute for observation whilst driving. (Just hear that little gem on the radio....happened in Yorkshire, apparently).
 
from telegraph article posted by OP

quote One theory detectives are thought to be examining is that the assailant was driving a classic car and may have been excessively angered by damage caused in the collision.

and from a local paper at the time of the incident

Worthing Herald
The suspect is described as a white man, aged between 30 and 40, 6ft tall, skinny with shoulder length brown
wavy hair with a thin face. His car is described as a pale coloured old style vehicle

Nothing has been said about the car yet, there has been mention that it will be bloodstained.

Sorry to play deveil's advocate here, as there is no excuse for what happened, but the family of the dead man are say
he was gentle kind an loving etc.

People that knew the accused are saying
“You couldn't know a nicer guy. He never got angry. He was friendly back, he just never started a chat"

Will we ever know the truth ?.
 
People that knew the accused are saying
“You couldn't know a nicer guy. He never got angry. He was friendly back, he just never started a chat"

They never do though do they? Imagine one day, people who know an accused will say "What old 'Slasher' Harris? Gawd he was mental he was! Always out with his knife, threatening people. I'm surpised you've only just got him mate I really am, he was mad"

[With apols to Lee Evans for copying his material.]
 
They never do though do they? Imagine one day, people who know an accused will say "What old 'Slasher' Harris? Gawd he was mental he was! Always out with his knife, threatening people. I'm surpised you've only just got him mate I really am, he was mad"

[With apols to Lee Evans for copying his material.]

Yep but they also say things nice about a the victim.
A few years back one that happened they quoted the victim as being a wonderful daughter who studied hard etc.
Never did a thing wrong,etc. etc.
She was killed outside of a nightclub, drunk and taken drugs, only 16

It doesn't make it right, but I will wait until the full story emerges
 
Without knowing the ins and outs either way it is impossible to tie this together based on newspaper reports. That is however the task for the police who will have to bring the case together such that the CPS can get an appropriate conviction.

At the moment all we know is that very fit older gentleman has been fatally wounded following an incident by a man in his thirties believed to be the chap that was arrested and charged. Both parties family and friends deem this out of character, yet it happened and we don't know why, nor for certain by who.
 
They never do though do they? Imagine one day, people who know an accused will say "What old 'Slasher' Harris? Gawd he was mental he was! Always out with his knife, threatening people. I'm surpised you've only just got him mate I really am, he was mad"

[With apols to Lee Evans for copying his material.]

True.
And along the same lines, the victim was never "an absolute w***er who pi55ed off everyone he met".

And no, I'm not saying that would be a defense, just that it's always what a nice person the attacker and/or victim always seemed to be.
As has been said previously, the truth will likely never be fully known.
 
Last edited:
And then there's those who think having satellite navigation is a substitute for observation whilst driving. (Just hear that little gem on the radio....happened in Yorkshire, apparently).

Judging by the number of people I see with sat navs stuck in the middle of the windscreen, they would have to replace observation as the driver would have a bloody great blind spot.
 
I thought murder is premeditited, the prosecuting counsel will try to prove that the defendant deliberately set out to end another's life.
Manslaughter is accidental which is why the defence counsel will try to convince the jury regarding mitigating circumstances regarding this incident and charge the defendant with manslaughter which carries a lower penalty
You don't have to prove the accused deliberately set out to end another's life for murder. You have to prove they intended to kill OR seriously injure the victim. As any reasonable person would believe that stabbing someone multiple times with a knife would result in serious injury, then that would be murder whether they "intended" to kill or not.
 
Chances are the car in front braked for what ever reason. The victim may well have been annoyed at this and hitting the other car and gone to have a bit of a rant at the other driver. Quite why the other bloke then pulls a knife and uses it several times is the bit that would be out of character for quite a few people I would imagine.
 
I think every classic car owner/club is hoping it's not theirs...
 
I still would like to know what the car was < Me curious >

I think every classic car owner/club is hoping it's not theirs...

According to a local source, who usually finds these things out, it a real classic .............................. a FORD FUSION !!!!!
I'll await official confirmation, but it backs up my thoughts on the background of the accused
 
According to a local source, who usually finds these things out, it a real classic .............................. a FORD FUSION !!!!!
I'll await official confirmation, but it backs up my thoughts on the background of the accused

I am intrigued to hear your thoughts on how driving a Ford Fusion has any bearing on the sort of person the accused is. There are 3 Fusion owners in my road. Young family mid 20's with a kid about 2yrs old. An older family late 30's with 2 daughters aged about 8 &10. The other is owned by a couple in their 70's.
 
There are 3 Fusion owners in my road. Young family mid 20's with a kid about 2yrs old. An older family late 30's with 2 daughters aged about 8 &10. The other is owned by a couple in their 70's.
And they're all killers. Be afraid. Or move.
 
According to a local source, who usually finds these things out, it a real classic .............................. a FORD FUSION !!!!!
I'll await official confirmation, but it backs up my thoughts on the background of the accused
Definitely not a classic car, not now, nor in the future ;)
 
I am intrigued to hear your thoughts on how driving a Ford Fusion has any bearing on the sort of person the accused is. There are 3 Fusion owners in my road. Young family mid 20's with a kid about 2yrs old. An older family late 30's with 2 daughters aged about 8 &10. The other is owned by a couple in their 70's.


Nothing to do with the character of who was driving if you read back to my earlier post, more to the insistence that it was a classic car
as below


Not sure where the classic car bit came from, only report l have seen said an older style pale car :thinking:
Bearing in mind that other reports have said he lived in a council flat and worked at the golf club
it may just be an old non classic perhaps ?
 
:confused:

Me, no I'm not confused. nothing to see here, move along.

Don't worry, you'll get over it.......................................one day :hug:
 
Nothing to do with the character of who was driving if you read back to my earlier post, more to the insistence that it was a classic car
as below

I may well have started that with something I posted a few days ago
One of the first reports I heard as "breaking news" a witness described the car as an "old one" or possibly " a Classic type"
 
Doesn't matter if he's Lord Hoyteytoyty in a 1943 Rolls Royce, or some sink estate chancer...Still deserves taking out the back.
 
Nothing to do with the character of who was driving if you read back to my earlier post, more to the insistence that it was a classic car
as below


A 2002-2012 car isn't exactly what I'd class as an older style car neither. Who ever described it as such would probably describe an estate as "one of those long ones".
 
Or maybe there was a third car involved :woot::thinking:
 
Back
Top