LeeRatters
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 7,354
- Name
- Lee
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Happy New Year All 
Hope you're having a drier day than we are down here!!
Hope you're having a drier day than we are down here!!
Happy new year everyone.
Nice work Paulie.
Thank you, JonathanNice work Paulie.
Much more difficult than it looks to light it so well.
No deep shadows, no large areas of burnt out whites, and fine detail.
Do you "need" a Fuji one? I'm sure there are plenty on Amazon, and the like, that will do the job.I can't see them on Fujis website, but is it possible to buy replacement original lens pouches?
Pete.
Running the Gauntlet by Nick Lowe, on FlickrAfter yesterdays high winds Totland bay is still a little bit lively today.
Xt5 Viltrox 27 1.2
Running the Gauntlet by Nick Lowe, on Flickr

Amazing love orion aswell xMy mum was telling me the other day that due to a thing called eccentric fixation, she sometimes can't see things if she looks directly at them. It doesn't usually bother her, but she was saying that Orion is her favourite constellation and can't see his sword any more, so I tried getting a shot for her tonight. Just handheld, with the 35 F/1.4. Quite pleased with how this came out:
View attachment 442360
Very kind of you George thank youThat's one very nice weather style capture Nick, perfect timing and well presented.
Did Fuji use a lower quality paint on the X100F?
I'm looking at getting one, but even those rated as Excellent on MPB etc show quite heavy scratching to the paint, most noticeable on the silver models, yet earlier models, S and T, even those rated as only good, rather than excellent don't look to have anywhere near the amount of marks and scratches?
MBP’s rating can’t be trusted IMO. Or rather, the don’t represents the truth of its description.
They would rate something without a box, accessories as “mint”. I’ve seen some with weird residue on the bottom rated as excellent.
Dont trust their rating system at all, judge it by photos. Pretend their rating system don’t exists.
Yes, agreed, I always go by the photos.
It just stood out to me that every X100F I look at seems to have a lot more battle scars than any other X100 model.
I’ve always been happy with everything I’ve had from them, but I don’t pay a lot of attention to the photos. For example there’s a Samyang 12mm auto focus lens listed at the moment, but the photo shows the manual focus version.Sometimes the photos don't show everything.
My X-T1, there is a TINY scratch on the EVF. You can't see it when looking through the viewfinder but it is there when looking at the surface. That was not mentioned or shown in the listing.
My 35/1.4 came without a hood, yet the listing showed it had a hood. Of course the photos doesn't show it, but then the photos don't show the box either even when they do come with one. So in that instance I trusted the listing.
Whoever takes the phones and whoever writes the description on the site must be different people and they must have so many to do in a day that they just go "Eeny, Meeny, Miny, Moe"
I've not really had a bad experience with MPB apart from one instance when I was sure a bit was on the listing (can't remember which bit tbh it was ages ago) but when it arrived the bit wasn't there. I contacted them but they insisted the listing I had ordered the bit wasn't shown. I had no recourse as the listing was no longer on the website so I returned the item and bought elsewhere. Since then I always take a screenshot of the listing I am ordering and any photos (on any online purchase) as my record of what I ordered. Fortunately I haven't needed to use the screenshots as evidence since I haven't had a bad experience since but once bitten as they say.Sometimes the photos don't show everything.
My X-T1, there is a TINY scratch on the EVF. You can't see it when looking through the viewfinder but it is there when looking at the surface. That was not mentioned or shown in the listing.
My 35/1.4 came without a hood, yet the listing showed it had a hood. Of course the photos doesn't show it, but then the photos don't show the box either even when they do come with one. So in that instance I trusted the listing.
Whoever takes the phones and whoever writes the description on the site must be different people and they must have so many to do in a day that they just go "Eeny, Meeny, Miny, Moe"
MBP’s rating can’t be trusted IMO. Or rather, the don’t represents the truth of its description.
They would rate something without a box, accessories as “mint”. I’ve seen some with weird residue on the bottom rated as excellent.
Dont trust their rating system at all, judge it by photos. Pretend their rating system don’t exists.
In my old age I have less patience to deal with faff, unnecessary faff, especially when it can be avoided. I just don't want to get it and then having to deal with customer service to rectify the situation, a situation they engineered. As I have experienced it twice personally already, I would have to be an even bigger fool than I already am after the 2 previous incidents to go through that that again. Fool me once and all that.
As such, I avoid MPB if at all possible, I would rather (and have), order blind from an unknown, never used seller from Japan than get it from MBP these days. I trust the listing on that more than MPB.
They are very low in my list of retailers to shop at. Until their description actually matches the photos, and by the posts here, it seems nothing has changed in almost a decade (I bought the XT-1 when the XT-2 just came out), I will continue to avoid them.
I decide on an X100F this morning, trading in my X-T100... Looking at what MPB had available, I went for one they stated as being in good condition as it looked in better condition than the cameras they stated as being in excellent condition, saving myself £100.
It doesn't include original packaging which I don't care about and it's missing the front decorative ring on the lens but looking on ebay, they can be picked up for around £10, so I'm still £90 better off.
That decorative ring is a filter adaptor. If you want to weather seal the camera, you will need it.
Ah okay, so that's what the adapter lenses attach to then?
It looks like it wasn't there in the photos, so I'll see what turns up and order one if need be.
The Path to Radley lakes 1 by Graham Norton, on Flickr
The Path to Radley lakes 2 by Graham Norton, on Flickr
Radley College by Graham Norton, on Flickr
Somewhere on the Ridgeway by Graham Norton, on Flickr
I'm honestly struggling to tell the difference. At a pinch I'd say 2 and 4 might be the Bessa.
Kit-Kat Stones by Lewis Craik, on Flickr
One from my editing backlog, taken on the X-T2 in August 2023.
Three more from a foggy Abingdon
The Path to Radley lakes 1 by Graham Norton, on Flickr
The Path to Radley lakes 2 by Graham Norton, on Flickr
Radley College by Graham Norton, on Flickr
And somewhere on the Ridgeway
Somewhere on the Ridgeway by Graham Norton, on Flickr
Oh sorry. None of these are the Bessa - that was a black and white roll. I shall post them in the film shots thread.
