- Messages
- 11,169
- Name
- Tim
- Edit My Images
- Yes
It's about £25 for the 64GB Lexar cards, hence asking.It`s the price difference that made me sit down![]()
I know SanDisk are a tad more expensive.
It's about £25 for the 64GB Lexar cards, hence asking.It`s the price difference that made me sit down![]()
That`s a good price. I`ve just had a look, and wonder what makes the SanDisk more than three times the price though. When I first got my new cards, the price for UHS2 was silly expensive in comparison.It's about £25 for the 64GB Lexar cards, hence asking.
I know SanDisk are a tad more expensive.
I use those in all my X cameras but for XH2 and XT5 i went up to 256GB.
I think I paid over £90 for 64mb cards many years ago... They went up to 4gb a few years later but just silly moneyThat`s a good price. I`ve just had a look, and wonder what makes the SanDisk more than three times the price though. When I first got my new cards, the price for UHS2 was silly expensive in comparison.
Bargin...I think I paid over £90 for 64mb cards many years ago... They went up to 4gb a few years later but just silly money
I see why they are so much cheaper now. They don't come with the cases !I'll be a guinea pig then and buy the Lexars to see how they do.![]()

Same here. I’ve never had any issues with them and they are plenty quick enough for my needs.
Foxy Snarl by Paulie-W, on Flickr
Eye to Eye by Paulie-W, on FlickrLovely images...!X-100 mk1
Notice a couple of things when used in anger.
1 - Adjust focus point needs 2 hands operation, horrible, especially for such a small camera, why why why? Who decided this?
2 - Shutter speed doesn't go high enough, even on a cloudy day on F/2.0.
3 - Therefore I need to use the ND filter, which has notible impact on image quality.
4 - Unable to overcome Auto ISO without going into the menu, even when I mapped ISO adjustment to the RAW button.
This is before focus speed slow, write speed slow, which are a given for an older camera, but these 4 points I would overcome with getting a newer model, if the newer model fixes these.
Files are quite nice, sharpness acceptable, size of the camera is amazing.
![]()
![]()
![]()
It needs a power supply of at least 5v to charge both I believe.Fuji BC W235 battery charger question...
Is it correct that it only charges one of the two batteries at any one time?
And if so, does / should it auto switch from CH1 to CH2 when CH1 is charged?
Edit: Answered my own question...
If you use the charger and chunky cable that comes with the camera it charges both batteries at the same time.
With a generic cable and phone charger, just one side is charged at a time.
Before the Storm by Nick Lowe, on Flickr
Watching Me by Nick Lowe, on FlickrYou are correct, sirI think I watched that scene yesterday......![]()


Oh, and DON'T EDIT OUT MODERATOR COMMENTS.More X-T20 experiments!
View attachment 386549
The moggy. Those blacks look great on this camera
View attachment 386548
First (slightly shakey) experiment with long exposure - f2.6, ISO1600, 15 seconds
If anyone has a TTartisans 27mm AF for sale, let me know. I can’t quite stretch to the Fuji equivalent at this time.
Still not mature enough for the classifieds; hope a note here is okay.
Mod Edit :- Post anything Classified related in The Classifieds. You'll get access when you have made enough posts and contibuted to the forums.
As you had ackowledged a recognition of the rules, consider this a light touch.
Duly noted; neither will happen again.Oh, and DON'T EDIT OUT MODERATOR COMMENTS.



On the evidence of a single outing, shooting a around 300 images the Lexar cards didn't cause any obvious issues.I see why they are so much cheaper now. They don't come with the cases !
Arrived today. Not had a chance to try them out yet though.
After correcting a fisheye to give a rectilinear image, you need to crop it to remove the blank areas.Okay. Question for the community
I was looking at the Meike 6.5mm f/2 fisheye.
I can't find any lens correction profiles on Lightroom for it.
Does anyone have one of these on their Fujis and can the image be corrected to the point where it looks like an ultra wide?
I appreciate that I should really be shooting multiple images and stiching them together, but on some occasions at the events I shoot, this isn't the best option.
I was pondering whether I could make my life easier with a fisheye and correction in pp.
I think after using the X100 properly, and found myself never using the OVF....instead of getting the X-Pro2 I might opt for a used X-E4 when one pops up.
I never use the OVF either. The advantage of the X100 for me is that once you mount a similar lens on the X-E4 the X100 is more compact but of course you can't change the X100 lens, if that matters.
X100F or V would cost like twice or 3x the price of a X-E4 body. Since I already have lenses...I only need the body. I never put the camera in my pocket anyway so the extra inch thicker is not a deal breaker.

This website is exactly what convinced me to buy an X100V, well a year ago today, I had one on loan from Fuji and that sealed the deal.I see you point but one of the main attractions to me is the compact size.
X100 v X-E4 with 23mm f2.
View attachment 386776
If you don't value that so much then there are clearly other options and then I think I might as well take my A7.

This website is exactly what convinced me to buy an X100V, well a year ago today, I had one on loan from Fuji and that sealed the deal.
Camel by Steve Jelly, on Flickr