Another comedy Dash Cam video

Would most HGV drivers not just undertake in that situation?

It smells of a set-up, but if that was the case I'd expect the truck to be in on it and wearing false plates (probably foreign).
 
Would most HGV drivers not just undertake in that situation?
I would have thought so to, I know I would, but the problem as it appears to me, the tit in the car was overtaking and slowing down again.
(It didn't happen just once apparently)
IF that was the case then maybe lane 1 was not clear enough for the lorry to get by.
Who knows? the more you look at it the more it smells like a load of out of date Mackerel
 
It's very possible that the car driver was being a tit but the lorry driver definitely became a bigger tit when he swerved into the car. Driver ego - the sooner we have driverless vehicles, the safer our roads will be.
 
3K nah

The driver will loose his DL for a period I would think........what ever the circumsatnces he has no excuse for useing the right hand lane and Brake testing the car driver in the left hand lane as well as flashing him and getting way to close while in the middle lane.....he is way out of line driving a 38tonner with that agression. He should be made to sit an anger management course while his ban is in force......

As previously mentioned, there are excuses for using the outside lane if in an artic.
I strongly suggest we haven't seen the start to the incident, nor the full details revealed by the terribly wronged owner of a dashcam company, but what is obvious is that he was blocking the middle lane with his hazards on. I suggest there'd been an earlier altercation, not shown, which led to the driver overtaking, putting on his hazards, then deliberately slowing.

As such the lorry driver is entitled to take avoiding action into the outside lane.

Now if Mr Dashcam was so innocent, why not show the whole incident.
Why so little damage if the lorry deliberately swerved at him.

Still, hope he sleeps at night ruining someones livelihood for his moment of fame
 
Seems he's getting unfavourable comments on the YouTube page:
What are you made of - fairy dust and dandelions ?! f*****g whiplash !!??
 
Some interesting observations of his character on that thread

How on earth do a bunch of people on a bike forum know "his character"?

I heard the lorry driver once kicked a dog. Typical. :D
 
Last edited:
The full video was up on his webpage, but it showed him deliberately slowing the lorry apparently, so has now been removed. Strange that. GPS data on it showed he pulled in front of the lorry then slowed below 48, with hazards on looking at the video.

Still it seems he's an interesting character, not only out to save us from Dangerous drivers (apart from himself) but also from Space weather
http://www.northamptonchron.co.uk/n...olice-race-to-focus-on-space-threat-1-4376089
 
Last edited:
comments stripped from his twitter page:
Quality - worth a read
https://BANNED/search?src=typd&q=@stockdalem



CCD6EEF7-17F1-47B5-AD54-47FB71823316_zpscry2pqdz.jpg
 
Last edited:
Damage_to_the_car__3516047b.jpg


£3K damage after being swipped by a lorry. Really? That looks more like a parking dink.
 
Damage_to_the_car__3516047b.jpg


£3K damage after being swipped by a lorry. Really? That looks more like a parking dink.

Are you saying he wasn't hit by the lorry?

Is that all the damage?

Edit: here's a better PIC showing the damage above the rear wheel arch (your PIC shows the lesser damaged front wheel arch I think, which as you correctly point out is not on its own £3k's worth of damage). :)

_86893510_image2.jpg
 
Last edited:
Damage_to_the_car__3516047b.jpg


£3K damage after being swipped by a lorry. Really? That looks more like a parking dink.

To be fair, there's damage on the other side as well.....but I'm not defending the cokwomble in any way....just sayin'.
 
Are you saying he wasn't hit by the lorry?

Is that all the damage?

Edit: here's a better PIC. :)

_86893510_image2.jpg


At 50-60mph and a lorry sideswipes you when you are doing 48mph?. What do you think? Where's the scrape marks that would be made
 
At 50-60mph and a lorry sideswipes you when you are doing 48mph?. What do you think? Where's the scrape marks that would be made

Lol. So you tell me, what do you think really happened?
 
How comes he's got a rear-facing dash cam? He sounds like he's just an attention seeking idiot tbh.
 
It's very possible that the car driver was being a tit but the lorry driver definitely became a bigger tit when he swerved into the car. Driver ego - the sooner we have driverless vehicles, the safer our roads will be.
I agree with the first but not your second point can you imagine the carnage when vehicles are
left at the mercey of programmers ? to err is to be human, but it takes a computer to totally f*** things up :D

Still it seems he's an interesting character, not only out to save us from Dangerous drivers (apart from himself) but also from Space weather
From the link

Millionaire businessman Matt Stockdale today revealed on his website how he has withdrawn from the police race ( to become Police & Crime Commissioner) and will instead concentrate his efforts on promoting the dangers of “space weather”.

And he wanted to be a police commisoner? :rolleyes:
 
And he wanted to be a police commisoner? :rolleyes:

He'd have fit in well. They're all nutters with no real clues about policing too :lol:
 
Middle lane hogger, ex Special Constable, millionaire businessman.

Let's be honest, even if the trucker had skinned him alive and eaten his heart at the roadside, "the hordes" would still applaud him. :)
 
Let's be honest, even if the trucker had skinned him alive and eaten his heart at the roadside, "the hordes" would still applaud him. :)
He deserved nothing less. Although burning at the stake may have been a good addendum too :D

Edit actually no, that would have been too good for him!
:D
 
Last edited:
Did I hear something about his policewitness website on the radio the other night?
 
I'm surprised how many people seem to think middle lane hogging is as severe as deliberately swerving an artic into the side of a car. Actually, no I'm not. This is OOF after all. :D

Because Its an Irritation at best however a few here find anyone that irritates them worthy of death....its a little extream way of thinking but middle lane hoggers are an pain just not enough for moider
 
however a few here find anyone that irritates them worthy of death....
I say kill'em all and let God sort them out ...
Ooops sorry wrong thread :D
 
As previously mentioned, there are excuses for using the outside lane if in an artic.
I strongly suggest we haven't seen the start to the incident, nor the full details revealed by the terribly wronged owner of a dashcam company, but what is obvious is that he was blocking the middle lane with his hazards on. I suggest there'd been an earlier altercation, not shown, which led to the driver overtaking, putting on his hazards, then deliberately slowing.

As such the lorry driver is entitled to take avoiding action into the outside lane.

Now if Mr Dashcam was so innocent, why not show the whole incident.
Why so little damage if the lorry deliberately swerved at him.

Still, hope he sleeps at night ruining someones livelihood for his moment of fame


IF The car driver has gone out of his way to set this all up........prison is the only answer for the man. end of
 
I say kill'em all and let God sort them out ...
Ooops sorry wrong thread :D

Arranging premature meetings with God and allowing him to deal with things is not a long term solution........afterall God is fair and just so it could well backfire on the arranger of the meetings.;)
 


Like I said IF he has gone out of his way to do this.......Prison!

And The report on that site seems rather more balanced than the replies here...........No surprise there then. I would love to see this go to court and see the verdict.

Plenty of pedal cycle riders use these tactics to get motorists to react in a negative way so they can catch incidents on gopro cams........It was only a matter of time I suppose....
 
Oh I dunno, sounds pretty final to me :D


Whats this...... Just taking the bits of text that fit your agenda;):D where have I seen that done before.............mmm let me see
 
And The report on that site seems rather more balanced than the replies here...........
Reading through that linked post, I would suggest that all those points and comments have been raised here.
 
Whats this...... Just taking the bits of text that fit your agenda;):D where have I seen that done before.............mmm let me see
No agenda, I was agreeing with you certainly in part, that meeting your God is a final and long term solution to all problems ;)
 
I'm still waiting for the conspiracy theory. :)
Well, if you'd seen the full video which he's now withdrawn as it shown him being the antagonist, or compare it to other videos he's posted, or read some of the descriptive posts in this thread... ;)
 
Well, if you'd seen the full video which he's now withdrawn as it shown him being the antagonist, or compare it to other videos he's posted, or read some of the descriptive posts in this thread... ;)

You're disputing the cause of the damage to the car and seem to be suggesting it wasn't caused by a collision with the lorry. I'm asking you, if the damage wasn't caused by the lorry, what do you think caused it?

I see nothing in those things you listed that helps me answer the question. :)
 
You're disputing the cause of the damage to the car and seem to be suggesting it wasn't caused by a collision with the lorry.
Its quite easy to cause minimal damage with something that large, I will confess my sins here, many years ago, while reverse parking a tri-ax 55 feet over all, I clipped a mirror of an already parked unit and trailer,
with the corner of my trailer, the damage amounted to a sheared nut on the mirror arm, that was it. :thumbs:
 
Back
Top