Would that be something tangible or just a random new article in the press?swerving an article into the side of a car.
See ? people make silly comments all the time in OoFActually, no I'm not. This is OOF after all.![]()
Would that be something tangible or just a random new article in the press?
See ? people make silly comments all the time in OoF![]()
I would have thought so to, I know I would, but the problem as it appears to me, the tit in the car was overtaking and slowing down again.Would most HGV drivers not just undertake in that situation?
3K nah
The driver will loose his DL for a period I would think........what ever the circumsatnces he has no excuse for useing the right hand lane and Brake testing the car driver in the left hand lane as well as flashing him and getting way to close while in the middle lane.....he is way out of line driving a 38tonner with that agression. He should be made to sit an anger management course while his ban is in force......
Some interesting observations of his character on that thread
![]()
£3K damage after being swipped by a lorry. Really? That looks more like a parking dink.
![]()
£3K damage after being swipped by a lorry. Really? That looks more like a parking dink.
Are you saying he wasn't hit by the lorry?
Is that all the damage?
Edit: here's a better PIC.
![]()
At 50-60mph and a lorry sideswipes you when you are doing 48mph?. What do you think? Where's the scrape marks that would be made
I agree with the first but not your second pointIt's very possible that the car driver was being a tit but the lorry driver definitely became a bigger tit when he swerved into the car. Driver ego - the sooner we have driverless vehicles, the safer our roads will be.
can you imagine the carnage when vehicles areFrom the linkStill it seems he's an interesting character, not only out to save us from Dangerous drivers (apart from himself) but also from Space weather
And he wanted to be a police commisoner?![]()

Fair point well presentedHe'd have fit in well. They're all nutters with no real clues about policing too![]()
Some of them have front and rear cameras in the same device. Not sure if that one doesHow comes he's got a rear-facing dash cam? He sounds like he's just an attention seeking idiot tbh.
He deserved nothing less. Although burning at the stake may have been a good addendum tooLet's be honest, even if the trucker had skinned him alive and eaten his heart at the roadside, "the hordes" would still applaud him.![]()
I'm surprised how many people seem to think middle lane hogging is as severe as deliberately swerving an artic into the side of a car. Actually, no I'm not. This is OOF after all.![]()
I say kill'em all and let God sort them out ...however a few here find anyone that irritates them worthy of death....
As previously mentioned, there are excuses for using the outside lane if in an artic.
I strongly suggest we haven't seen the start to the incident, nor the full details revealed by the terribly wronged owner of a dashcam company, but what is obvious is that he was blocking the middle lane with his hazards on. I suggest there'd been an earlier altercation, not shown, which led to the driver overtaking, putting on his hazards, then deliberately slowing.
As such the lorry driver is entitled to take avoiding action into the outside lane.
Now if Mr Dashcam was so innocent, why not show the whole incident.
Why so little damage if the lorry deliberately swerved at him.
Still, hope he sleeps at night ruining someones livelihood for his moment of fame
I say kill'em all and let God sort them out ...
Ooops sorry wrong thread![]()
Oh I dunno, sounds pretty final to meArranging premature meetings with God is not a long term solution........
Oh I dunno, sounds pretty final to me![]()
Reading through that linked post, I would suggest that all those points and comments have been raised here.And The report on that site seems rather more balanced than the replies here...........
No agenda, I was agreeing with you certainly in part, that meeting your God is a final and long term solution to all problemsWhats this...... Just taking the bits of text that fit your agendawhere have I seen that done before.............mmm let me see
Lol. So you tell me, what do you think really happened?
Well, if you'd seen the full video which he's now withdrawn as it shown him being the antagonist, or compare it to other videos he's posted, or read some of the descriptive posts in this thread...I'm still waiting for the conspiracy theory.![]()
Well, if you'd seen the full video which he's now withdrawn as it shown him being the antagonist, or compare it to other videos he's posted, or read some of the descriptive posts in this thread...![]()
Its quite easy to cause minimal damage with something that large, I will confess my sins here, many years ago, while reverse parking a tri-ax 55 feet over all, I clipped a mirror of an already parked unit and trailer,You're disputing the cause of the damage to the car and seem to be suggesting it wasn't caused by a collision with the lorry.