Why is this so black and white for everyone? It's been discussed at length as to what is unprofessional, professional etc, with people offering opinions or otherwise. Before photography was my main source of income I was considered a 'professional' within my trade, taking a lot of pride in what I did. I encountered many people who acted unprofessional however were very good at what they produced, equally I met a lot who were very professional in how they presented themselves but fundamentally produced a load of rubbish because they were idiots.
I think what is truly being tested or pondered here is not any test of anyone's real world professionalism or perception thereof, however how clever they think they are within the limits of this forum.
^This.
I tend to stay out of these threads because much like Nikon vs Canon they are entirely subjective.
Photography is not a regulated industry in the UK, and the legislation in Germany for example is easily circumvented and even then unlikely to make this particular discussion any less subjective.
- Having a photographic, arts, or imaging based degree does not automatically make you a "Professional Photographer"
- Being a member of a photographic association or trade body does not automatically make you a "Professional Photographer"
- Holding a distinction from one of the above does not automatically make you a "Professional Photographer"
- Taking any exam, diploma, course, or even period of practice does not automatically make you a "Professional Photographer"
- Teaching photography for a living doesn't automatically make you a "Professional Photographer"
This is nothing like being a lawyer, doctor, dentist, vet, chartered accountant or any of the other jobs that require a certain level of study and qualification, or a licence, before you can call yourself the title, stick letters after your name, and open a practice. It is both a hobby/pastime and a job which is why you use
professional to distinguish between those who do it as a "job" and those who do it for purely pleasure - whatever the level of quality, service, dedication and percentage of the hours of the day spent.
ANYONE can call themselves a
professional photographer, and no-one can legally force them to stop doing so.
There is nothing wrong with having the discussion, but the only real fact here is that everyones opinion about what a "Professional Photographer" is, could be valid - and as long as everyone understands that then there isn't a problem. There isn't a black or a white - just lots and lots of shades of grey.