The Fabulous Fuji X owners thread

That's about where I've settled, albeit I'm slumming it with a just-bought X100S and my X-T2.

Not slumming it at all. Both are great cameras and they do say the best camera is the one you have. I'm just a magpie. If I bought an X-T2 or 3 which I was looking at doing, I know i'll just want the X-T4 still and end up selling the stuff I just bought to get the X-T4 and waste money.
 
Thing is though, you can get that melt away shallow DOF with much, much cheaper lenses. Like the Viltrox 85 1.8, very easy to achieve this result and it's about as sharp as I'll ever need, especially stopped down a little. I've taken head/shoulder shots using it at F4 that had very pleasing bokeh. Now, it's trickier for full length portraits and that's where I can see a lens like the 50 F/1 come into it's own, but it's 7 times the price! [if you get the 85 for as little as many of us here have]

Yeah that 85mm is a bargain. Impressed with what I've seen from it.
 
Not slumming it at all. Both are great cameras and they do say the best camera is the one you have. I'm just a magpie. If I bought an X-T2 or 3 which I was looking at doing, I know i'll just want the X-T4 still and end up selling the stuff I just bought to get the X-T4 and waste money.


Yeah I go with that, the older models didn't suddenly turn to dust because newer ones appeared. The X100s is still a cracking compact and the X-T2 is still very competitive today.
 
Learn to pan, you'll need a surprisingly low shutter speed 1/60 -1/125, so may need a 2/3 stop ND filter to control light, put camera in burst mode and track the vehicle - I used zone focus/tracking
What Mr P said is dead right, but if it's your first time I'd suggest starting with a slightly higher shutter speed, get a few pics in the bag (although they won't have the same sense of movement) then work your way down using the same technique. Personally I favour single point and continuous focus, but that probably just habit from old DSLR days.
I'd expect the aperture to be something like F11/16/F22 depending on how bright the day is - and if it was me I'd set the ISO to 200, and open up the aperture if I'm short of light.

And if you can take some near head on shots, then you could just freeze the motion with a fast shutter speed, at least that way you will get some images with them at the wheel.
Just to thank you very much for the advice, which came in very helpful today at Thruxton - I got the shots I was after and really pleased with some.
 
Yeah that 85mm is a bargain. Impressed with what I've seen from it.

I always wanted the 90, but it just never happened - I did choose the 16 1.4 over it at one point, it was either or - so for me on a tighter budget the 85 is ideal. If I only ever get the odd decent image using it, it'll be worth it. And I've already achieved that I feel [had a confirmation last week and got some lovely shots]
 
I always wanted the 90, but it just never happened - I did choose the 16 1.4 over it at one point, it was either or - so for me on a tighter budget the 85 is ideal. If I only ever get the odd decent image using it, it'll be worth it. And I've already achieved that I feel [had a confirmation last week and got some lovely shots]

The 90mms my favourite fuji lens, but it would be hard to justify over the 85mm now.
 
The only downside I found with the 85 was it's tracking ability, great for portraits, not great on moving subjects.
 
@Cagey75 and others, what settings are you guys using in LR for sharpening?


I had a period where I was keeping it at default, but bringing masking up to around 85, but now it's set at 5 by default as I have set up an import preset. I've been very comfortable with the sharpness of my images recently, I think a decent monitor makes a huge difference.
 
I never see them, simply processing how I mentioned. I remember seeing them on Nikon, Olympus and Panasonic files if I pushed sharpening too hard, with Fuji you just have to hold back more so - I know a lot of people just don't get this as I see uploads with artifacts and they'll have sharpening at 50 with no masking and wonder why

I watched a video a while back when a YouTuber, I’m sure it was Nigel Danson, asked his viewers to edit a few of his pics to get their take on his shots. He put a few RAW files up for download - some Nikon Z files and some Fuji XT3 files. When he posted the edits one of them was a horrible, worm-riddled mess. Horribly over sharpened and generally mangled. I thought someone had smashed one his Fuji pics in LR. Turns out it was a Nikon file. Any file will fall apart if you push the sliders too far.

Zero sharpening in Lightroom, export to PS for sharpening works fine for me. I then just layer mask and brush out the sharpening where I don’t want it, sky for example.
 
Last edited:
I had a period where I was keeping it at default, but bringing masking up to around 85, but now it's set at 5 by default as I have set up an import preset. I've been very comfortable with the sharpness of my images recently, I think a decent monitor makes a huge difference.

Thanks, I'm using a 32" 4k Philips IPS, don't get me wrong, the files are mostly great, just sometimes with distant objects there's a lack of clarity, Tbh though that couldve been down to either af box being to big or the conditions. I've gotten a lot of keepers from the Fuji already, it's a really nice setup.
 
The only downside I found with the 85 was it's tracking ability, great for portraits, not great on moving subjects.
I did my usual test and I got a very high hit rate with the xt3 and 85v on latest fw, I was surprised Tbh. Both with single point caf and eye af.
 
Got a shoot on Monday and will be my first gowith the 85, quite excited

Best of luck, I'd be confident enough in the 85 to get the job done smoothly :)

The 90mms my favourite fuji lens, but it would be hard to justify over the 85mm now.


The 90mm has a couple advantages of course, better CFD and WR. The latter never really bothers me, it's nice to have that bit of added security but I've never had a lens act up let alone fail because I shot in the rain. The closer focus is more attractive for me. 60cm vs the 80cm on the Viltrox doesn't sound like much, but if like me you really enjoy close upstill life then it does make a massive difference. Still, the 85 can get in as close as any other 85 out there and it's usually sufficient
 
I did my usual test and I got a very high hit rate with the xt3 and 85v on latest fw, I was surprised Tbh. Both with single point caf and eye af.

Aye, I wonder have those who say it's not the best for tracking etc updated the FW, apparently it made a huge difference [I never used it prior to the latest FW]
 
Oh, one of the things I really like about this camera is dragging the AF point with my thumb while looking through the evf, it works so well, way better than using a joystick.
 
If you mean does it have FF coverage? as an APSC lens - I doubt it. It can only be used on Fuji either way, don't think Fuji lenses can be adapted to other systems
No, I was just trying to work out the ff ‘equivalencies’ so basically a ‘75’mm field of view.
 
No, I was just trying to work out the ff ‘equivalencies’ so basically a ‘75’mm field of view.


Aye, it equates to something like a 75mm f/1.5 for FF [but still maintaining the same brightness you'd get at F/1 for either] , which would be quite an exotic lens, as is this Fuji F/1
 
Not slumming it at all. Both are great cameras and they do say the best camera is the one you have. I'm just a magpie. If I bought an X-T2 or 3 which I was looking at doing, I know i'll just want the X-T4 still and end up selling the stuff I just bought to get the X-T4 and waste money.

I was just kidding. :) It took me a long time to realise it, but I am diverting the £££s from bodies to lenses: 50-140 and 16-80 so far and then probably a couple of primes before a 10-24. Selling off my A7ii kit should help get me there.
 
Ok so I have some more money burning a hole in my pocket.

I currently have a Fuji 18-55mm and a Viltrox 85mm.

I'm thinking of selling the 18-55mm and combining funds to buy a Samyang 12mm, Viltrox 23mm and Viltrox 33mm.

I know the gap is big between 33 and 85 but I could probably plug that at a later date with a 50mm.

Keen to hear if others would think this is a good route to go or if they have other recommendations.
 
Ok so I have some more money burning a hole in my pocket.

I currently have a Fuji 18-55mm and a Viltrox 85mm.

I'm thinking of selling the 18-55mm and combining funds to buy a Samyang 12mm, Viltrox 23mm and Viltrox 33mm.

I know the gap is big between 33 and 85 but I could probably plug that at a later date with a 50mm.

Keen to hear if others would think this is a good route to go or if they have other recommendations.

I think its an excellent route as Ive done exactly that :LOL:
 
Love my 18 55, dont think i could ever be without it

it never seems to get a lot of love but i really like my 27mm pancake lens ...
 
Great fun, although running from the pits to the viewing point was pretty exhausting for the photos. My hubby donated the fast drive with a pro driver to me - now that was fun! Next time I’m driving round the track!

I did single seaters at Thruxton years ago, and was serious fun (even spinning off). Also did the Brands Hatch rally one, which was pretty insane tbh :D I got sworn at, at that one lol
Instructor quote, which I`ll never forget " Two hands on the wheel. You`re not driving a f*****g fork lift!"
 
Love my 18 55, dont think i could ever be without it

it never seems to get a lot of love but i really like my 27mm pancake lens ...

I love my 18-55 but I long for wider for landscape and faster apertures at longer lengths.
This seems like a good way to get the best of both worlds and just learn to zoom more with my feet.
 
That`s gonna be a silly amount of £££££
 
50mm f1.0, a good review for anyone who`s buying it.



I'm glad he said that calling the 35 1.4 'magic' was silly, sites like DPR are riddled with people claiming this, the lens is fine, and renders really nicely but 'magic' it isn't. Good review there, that guy can make any lens sing though, always has really nice pics in his reviews
 
Ok so I have some more money burning a hole in my pocket.

I currently have a Fuji 18-55mm and a Viltrox 85mm.

I'm thinking of selling the 18-55mm and combining funds to buy a Samyang 12mm, Viltrox 23mm and Viltrox 33mm.

I know the gap is big between 33 and 85 but I could probably plug that at a later date with a 50mm.

Keen to hear if others would think this is a good route to go or if they have other recommendations.

Keep the 18-55. Buy a 10-24 ;)
 
The 10-24 is a lens I was never interested in, until recently. I was never a WA shooter but when i had the 16mm I really enjoyed it and the odd time I wished it was a little wider. A nice cheap alternative though is the Samyang 12mm F2, nice lens for the money that one, MF only but at that FL manual focusing is a cinch
 
Back
Top