So Cheryl Cole's clearly no lady then? She's got a tat on her wrist
.
Most men I know think they are crap.
No research ,no detailed sources,no *******s. I`m 43, most guys I know of my age ,loathe tattoos on women,call us old codgers if you must.
![]()
Well what ive sad I'm gonna try is to get a fake one, and have it on my wrist for a week and see how i feel. If i feel ok, then thats the time to be considering it seriously.
some people said they would not be friends with someone who has a tattoo because they must smoke and drink if not more
Most men I know think they are crap.
No research ,no detailed sources,no *******s. I`m 43, most guys I know of my age ,loathe tattoos on women,call us old codgers if you must.
![]()


Well, I'm 46 and I think it depends on the tattoo and on the 'canvas' it's inked on...some girls look utterly stunning with tats, some look horrendous - but then those same girls might look equally horrendous without the ink - a good design usually helps...


Well, I'm 46 and I think it depends on the tattoo and on the 'canvas' it's inked on...some girls look utterly stunning with tats, some look horrendous - but then those same girls might look equally horrendous without the ink - a good design usually helps...
I think if someone already looks good, a good tattoo won't lessen the appeal, but if someone only looks average or so-so then a bad design can definitely make them look a lot worse...
I happen to like lumbar tribal tattoos on girls, even though they're supposed to be slightly passe nowadays; especially girls with 'bum-dimples'...mmm...![]()
said better than i could have Squizz, if you want one go for it. But if you have to ask about it, to me, then there appears some doubt in your mind still. You could aslo re-invent the one on your back while tou're at it
Personally it makes no difference if womn have tattoos or not. Its still the same person. I dread to think how much they cost nowadays though. I remember mine cost £4.50 when i had them done![]()
ah yes paulie...but £4.50 was a lot of money in 1936![]()
Ya cheeky b****r, i'm not that old 
Firstly I think as soon as the needle hits yer arm your going to sober up.. Secondly the tattooist should be struck of any list he may be on.. Theres no way any decent tattoist would do the above![]()
Exactly - and I've learnt that the hard way with the one on my back.
He's had three or four tattoos now (the others were pre-planned, however), and I know that he was drunk when he had one of the other ones done as well, at a Middlesbrough tattooist's. I don't know how he manages it. :shrug:
I have never seen the point in one on your back as you can't see it yourself.
.
The right way to get a tattoo was to get them done where no one could see them under normal clothes.. there used to be two types of tattoo artists.. the ones that would mark you anywhere you wanted, usual back street shops.. and the tattooist who would never do wrists, hands, faces blah blah.. and this was in the 70s![]()
I know of a couple of places that won't do certain things, like fingers and names.
I'm not a fan of name tattoos TBH - someone I know is getting married next year, he has 4 children and still has his ex girlfriends name on his arm.
I know of a couple of places that won't do certain things, like fingers and names.

I'm afraid tattoos are a turn off for me. Daft question - what is the point of having a tattoo?
self expression.
For me personally it was having the choice to have something happen to my body (ie, having the picture on) and before that, self expression.
Couldn't resist a google search!
![]()