- Messages
- 5,943
- Name
- Darran, Daz or ****
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Wouldn't surprise if they do eventually recognise the crossbred designer breeds in general.There was talk of them recognising labradoodles at on time, don't know if they ever did
Wouldn't surprise if they do eventually recognise the crossbred designer breeds in general.There was talk of them recognising labradoodles at on time, don't know if they ever did
And most people, including some who should know better, are convinced that physical characteristics determine how a breed ’performs’ but while they may be important much of it is in the brain and sense organsMost breeds have evolved by being bred for the right traits by people who spent years getting it right.
Unfortunately when certain shows started interpreting things to suit the judges many breed were led down a path
I just can't agree with the stupidity of it all.There’s been a push to get them recognised I believe, but it’s also been proven that the ‘allergy’ benefits of their coat is pretty much non-existent. A lovely dog like most, but a designer dog nonetheless with no proven benefits as far as I’m aware.
The problem to a certain extent is also with some known breeds.And most people, including some who should know better, are convinced that physical characteristics determine how a breed ’performs’ but while they may be important much of it is in the brain and sense organs.
I don’t think there’d necessarily be a problem with recognising first crosses, maybe even some benefits. But much KC breeding is done for showing and they, in effect, cull the unsuitable dogs by selling them as ‘pet quality’Wouldn't surprise if they do eventually recognise the crossbred designer breeds in general.
And most people, including some who should know better, are convinced that physical characteristics determine how a breed ’performs’ but while they may be important much of it is in the brain and sense organs.
A lot of breeds would have evolved from crossing them.I don’t think there’d necessarily be a problem with recognising first crosses, maybe even some benefits.
I expect it’s already been done in the US, GSD x Terrier is fairly common I think:A lot of breeds would have evolved from crossing them.
I think the rise of designer crossbreeds has become so mainstream and it will carry on.
I look forward to seeing the first German Shepherd crossed with a Yorkshire Terrier![]()
One of my ex bosses had a Labradoodle TBH It was more doodle than Labra.I agree with you, the idea was that poodle don't shed so that would stop the allergies but did, and yes I think they are lovely to, if somewhat scatty, well those I've met are![]()
If it is true (and I don’t know) I can‘t see why people wouldn’t just get poodles, given they are fairly common and 3 different sizes, and one would think any “non allergenic) property would be st than in an outcrossthe idea was that poodle don't shed so that would stop the allergies
We had a neighbour who also had a Labradoodle PAT dog. That one was soft as butter as well. We're more cat people (though there are plenty of dogs in the family, which is another story) but the Labradoodle came close to converting us!It was a registered PAT dog, and often went around hospitals, hospice's etc. Soft as you like and a lovely dog all round.

If it is true (and I don’t know) I can‘t see why people wouldn’t just get poodles, given they are fairly common and 3 different sizes, and one would think any “non allergenic) property would be st than in an outcross.
And to add a ridiculous sale price to themThey are mainly just BYB dogs that people give made up names to make them sound legit
Gawd, can anything surprise me in this day and ageI expect it’s already been done in the US, GSD x Terrier is fairly common I think:
![]()
German Shepherd Mix: 25 Popular And 6 Rare Breeds
Discover the German Shepherd mix breeds everyone is talking about, from the 25 most popular mixes, to 6 rare and unexpected GSD crosses.thehappypuppysite.com
The 2 I know about both look like standard Poodles but they both act more like a Labrador.One of my ex bosses had a Labradoodle TBH It was more doodle than Labra.
Soft as you like and a lovely dog all round.
That made me almost laugh and fall to the floor when I've heard how much they paid for them.And to add a ridiculous sale price to them![]()
Surely the crossbred Labradors / Golden Retreivers that are used for helping blind people would be more ideal as assistance dogs?Labradoodles were originally bred as assistance dogs for people with allergies, it got out of hand when everyone wanted one
bit like these other crosses.
And to add a ridiculous sale price to them![]()
I'd never heard of that one and it's availabe on kindle.Have you read DOGS by Raymond and Lorna Coppimger, really interesting on ?
Interesting and understandable theories on dog evolution, written in 2001
I havent read their book but know about their work and think it’s very useful. Their view is that people did not domesticate dogs but rather some wolves domesticated themselves. I’ve always tended to the view that dogs domesticated people (not entirely joking) which isn’t a million miles away from their ideas ;(.Have you read DOGS by Raymond and Lorna Coppimger, really interesting on ?
Interesting and understandable theories on dog evolution, written in 2001
There was a time I would have only bought a pedigree dog.I don't get the problem with the term "animal lover". Either you love animals or you don't. If you do, you take your dogs from the RSPCA or a shelter for the most part. What you don't do is order "designer pups". If you operate in the latter sphere you love yourself, not dogs.
I havent read their book but know about their work and think it’s very useful. Their view is that people did not domesticate dogs but rather some wolves domesticated themselves. I’ve always tended to the view that dogs domesticated people (not entirely joking) which isn’t a million miles away from their ideas ;(.
I’m not sure they take account of the hunting aspect of early (and present day) dogs though.
Lately, I think the geneticists are coming to the view that the dog ancestor is not the current Grey/Gray Wolf but an extinct, and so far unknown, Wolf — unknown except that dogs would be that unknown Wolf of course.
I was half watching something on TV yesterday were they stated that all dogs share 98% of there DNA with wolves
2 years sounds about right, for most dogs, some take even longer.Given it can take 2 years for a Labrador to mature imho that's asking for trouble cross breeding.
Humans share 60% DNA with banana'sI think it’s 98.8% humans and chimps so that figure probably doesn't help :j(.
Humans share 60% DNA with banana's
I thought huh? then I read a few posts on facebook
![]()
Back when I had my GSD there were 2 trains of fault, some said they reach full maturity at 18 months and some said 2 years.2 years sounds about right, for most dogs, some take even longer.
My GSP was around 3 years old before she fully twigged what she was supposed to be doing ( HPR)Back when I had my GSD there were 2 trains of fault, some said they reach full maturity at 18 months and some said 2 years.
Over the years I've heard some people say some breeds don't fully mature until they are 4 years old.
I have believed this for quite a long time.I think it’s 98.8% humans and chimps so that figure probably doesn't help :j(.
Mine was quite thick as a pup but thankfully treat based rewards work well and eventually she was so easy to train.My GSP was around 3 years old before she fully twigged what she was supposed to be doing ( HPR)
I had a GSD rescue. Very badly treated, and very few manners She was supposed to have been 3 years old, but I'd put her nearer 5 .
It only took about 6 months of ownership, until she was fully trained.
You can teach an old dog new tricks![]()
Nobody thinks there is a “missing link” these days, it’s an out of date concept.I know there is the missing linke with Darwins theory
I think it lost favour because it was applied incorrectly. The term was originally applied to an absent phenotype that evolutionists believed should exist. It was degraded by popular missuse whereby it was applied to any evidence showing a relationship between ancient and modern phenotypes in an evolutionary branch.Nobody thinks there is a “missing link” these days, it’s an out of date concept..
Spot on Darran!There was a time I would have only bought a pedigree dog.
When I lost my GSD at the time I wasn't interested in getter another dog.
Back then the daughters of an ex wanted a dog so we got one from the local rescue.
He was a Staff / Border Collie cross and he was an exceptional dog.
My girl who is a Cocker Spaniel / Labrador cross came from a rescue in 2008.
In both cases I soon realised that giving a dog a life from a rescue is far more rewarding.
I think all that designer b******* was started by Paris Hilton so that just shows how society has progressed
Again, another dog motivated by food and she quickly learned as well.
My preference is bitches and I've always found them greedier than dogs.
There’s a certain irony in the disapproval of cross-bred dogs by specimens of H sapiens in this thread given that we now know we are rather more extreme cross-breeds ourselvesI think it lost favour because it was applied incorrectly. The term was originally applied to an absent phenotype that evolutionists believed should exist. It was degraded by popular missuse whereby it was applied to any evidence showing a relationship between ancient and modern phenotypes in an evolutionary branch.
With the rapid advances in genetic mapping it's more rewarding to plot the relationships between extant genotypes, rather than search for the remains of phenotypes which may or may not have existed.
There’s a certain irony in the disapproval of cross-bred dogs by specimens of H sapiens in this thread given that we now know we are rather more extreme cross-breeds ourselves![]()
Now this is interesting.And then there are the Turkish street dogs:
I only used it so the dogs would get use to my hand signals, once that was achieved I rarely rewarded them.That's ok if you have a food motivated dog, I personally have never trained using treats, mine
always got praise for doing things, works fine and you don't have a dog glued to watching your hands
for food.
My brother and sister are quite a few years older than me and I remember them and my mum talking about street dogs in the UK.Not really disapproval of crosses/mongrels, in my childhood days all our dogs were street accidents,
people let their dogs roam and as I have said before, gave pups away and those that didn't have homes were
"got rid of" by the owners.
One of my last dogs when my kids were small was one of such, local village policeman's collie bitch got out
and was seen tied with several local male dogs, pups looked different.
I totally agree with you but sadly I can't see things changing.My dislike of the latest fad is the fact that they are churned out, disregarding any welfare for pups of mum
and sold at vast prices to make money, as far as I know, no one is cross breeding homo sapiens to sell for profit
I suspect the mis-named choke chains (should be check chain) work well used the “Barbara Woodhouse” way, though from what I remember of her TV programmes she was mostly training owners not dogs.apart from idiots using such things as choke chains, every safe method is fine.