Nikon D750 & D780

minnnt said:
I just don't want to end up with a bag full of lenses.

I think a 24/58/135 would be pretty sweet though.
Click to expand...
Trouble with this is I'd end up wanting 3 bodies to put them on ;)
 
UaeExile said:
I think it depends what and how you prefer to shoot. For me, whilst the 24-70 is versatile it gives me more to think about that I could do without.

The more is use the prime combo the more I "see" that way. Even though I've got to move my legs I seem to work much quicker with primes too.

My ultimate set up would be a couple of D750s and 24 1.4 / 58 1.4 combo.
Click to expand...

I am also thinking this, 24 with a 58 and a 70-200 in my bag for wedding ceremonies and maybe speaches.

It would mean getting rid of my 85, which I do love. I currently pair it with a 35, I like the focal length but not sure it's completely right for me and I define toy need something wider for groups and tight spaces.
 
redlion said:
Good luck with the new venture @UaeExile

What is the wedding scene like in the UAE?
Click to expand...

The wedding scene isn't great TBH. Don't get me wrong there is a market but it's so diverse, just like the population here. You've got everything from traditional, modern, documentary, and then the insane weddings held (literally) in an exhibition centre. I'll just shoot how I want and hopefully attract people who have a similar vision to me.

That's why I'm going to do family portraits, seniors, that sort of stuff. That's very popular here and there's only a handful of togs who are any good. The best (IMO) charges £200 for a weekend session (with no products) and almost £1,000 for a digital package..... That's an insane amount for a family shoot IMO, but she is very good.

Hopefully I can pull together a portfolio over the next few months and look to really kick it off in the new year.
 
AndrewSt said:
I am also thinking this, 24 with a 58 and a 70-200 in my bag for wedding ceremonies and maybe speaches.

It would mean getting rid of my 85, which I do love. I currently pair it with a 35, I like the focal length but not sure it's completely right for me and I define toy need something wider for groups and tight spaces.
Click to expand...

Yeah I'd probably keep my 70-200 for a few months to see if it gets any use. Ideally I want a small, uncomplicated set up that I'm 100% comfortable with. At the minute I don't have that because I've got so much bloody stuff! :D
 
minnnt said:
One has just sold in the classifieds for £915.
Click to expand...

And I can't wait [emoji38]

Unexpected car repair meant my lens plan is put on hold, but I've got the 50mm 1.8g and I picked up a 16-35 g so I've got enough to get on with.
 
Last edited:
minnnt said:
I'm very tempted with a prime setup too but the 24-70 is just such a good lens it would be hard to let it go. :/
Click to expand...
I wouldn't as it is like five 2.8 prime lenses in one - 24, 28, 35, 50 and 70. Unless you need 1.4 or 1.8 and a lighter setup in some occasions.
 
Yesterday I attended the Nikon School seminar organised by Amateur Photography in London at their office in Southwark. The session's highlight was Richard Peters, award winning wildlife photographer. Richard showed some nice pictures and the stories behind those pictures that was really inspiring. But the later half of his presentation turned out pretty boring with his obsession on shooting pigeons, badgers and foxes in his back garden. He got some nice award wining images shot in his back garden, but his presentation was bit dull.

Nikon arranged drinks and had on display to test and play with the following
  • D810
  • D750
  • D4s
  • D7200
  • 24-70 2.8 VR
  • 500mm f4E FL ED VR
  • 200-400mm f/4G ED VR II
  • 80-400mm f4.5-5.6G ED VR
  • 300mm f/4E PF ED VR
The super-zooms were really fun to play with on the D4s and D810, If they had used memory card, at the end of the event they would have been left with loads of tight head shots from a distance. The 300 PF lens was quite a surprise with its small size, light weight and handling. Loved it and I hope future lenses will be much lighter and smaller with technologies like this. The new 24-70 VR felt really good on the D810 and it was the quickest and snappiest of all lenses in terms of AF. The combination felt solid, but it would be heavy if I have to lug it around all day. Images were sharp and crisp at 2.8 even in low light. I was hoping to try the 24-70 on the D750, but didn't get a chance to request that.

I tried the D810 and D750 on a dim area at the venue to check AF, but since the bodies had different lenses, it was not a test really and found both to be excellent in locking AF. Side by side the D750 grip felt slightly better. The shutter sound on the D810 is one good reason why many would choose it if they were given a chance to test side by side. The D7200 was also a nice cam to handle and shoot with and found it very responsive and the AF was excellent as well.The AF spread as we all know was best on the D7200.

Met quite a few folks who use the D750 and they were all a happy bunch :). Overall it was a nice event, saw some great pictures and how they were shot and played with some gear I will never own, one I own and love (D750) and a couple I wish to own someday (24-70 2.8, 300 F4).
 
Not sure I can justify the cost of the 58, compared to the 35/85 combo. Definitely GAS but I love the unique look it has, especially for B&G portraits and engagement shoots etc.
 
AndrewSt said:
Not sure I can justify the cost of the 58, compared to the 35/85 combo. Definitely GAS but I love the unique look it has, especially for B&G portraits and engagement shoots etc.
Click to expand...
For me it probably has the best 'look' of all the Nikon primes.
 
anibap said:
Yesterday I attended the Nikon School seminar organised by Amateur Photography in London at their office in Southwark. The session's highlight was Richard Peters, award winning wildlife photographer. Richard showed some nice pictures and the stories behind those pictures that was really inspiring. But the later half of his presentation turned out pretty boring with his obsession on shooting pigeons, badgers and foxes in his back garden. He got some nice award wining images shot in his back garden, but his presentation was bit dull.

Nikon arranged drinks and had on display to test and play with the following
  • D810
  • D750
  • D4s
  • D7200
  • 24-70 2.8 VR
  • 500mm f4E FL ED VR
  • 200-400mm f/4G ED VR II
  • 80-400mm f4.5-5.6G ED VR
  • 300mm f/4E PF ED VR
The super-zooms were really fun to play with on the D4s and D810, If they had used memory card, at the end of the event they would have been left with loads of tight head shots from a distance. The 300 PF lens was quite a surprise with its small size, light weight and handling. Loved it and I hope future lenses will be much lighter and smaller with technologies like this. The new 24-70 VR felt really good on the D810 and it was the quickest and snappiest of all lenses in terms of AF. The combination felt solid, but it would be heavy if I have to lug it around all day. Images were sharp and crisp at 2.8 even in low light. I was hoping to try the 24-70 on the D750, but didn't get a chance to request that.

I tried the D810 and D750 on a dim area at the venue to check AF, but since the bodies had different lenses, it was not a test really and found both to be excellent in locking AF. Side by side the D750 grip felt slightly better. The shutter sound on the D810 is one good reason why many would choose it if they were given a chance to test side by side. The D7200 was also a nice cam to handle and shoot with and found it very responsive and the AF was excellent as well.The AF spread as we all know was best on the D7200.

Met quite a few folks who use the D750 and they were all a happy bunch :). Overall it was a nice event, saw some great pictures and how they were shot and played with some gear I will never own, one I own and love (D750) and a couple I wish to own someday (24-70 2.8, 300 F4).
Click to expand...
I've just signed up to a freebie Nikon 'school/photoshoot' event at Harrison cameras (hope I get accepted ;)) and hoping to get to try out a few bits and bobs. I've been to one before, and this is hosted by the same guy, John Clements. Excellent speaker, very enthusiastic and very informative. Hopefully this will be as useful as last time. Last time it was looking at flash photography, this one is using advanced features so hoping to learn a few new tricks :D

Note to self, must resist trying out the D810 again ;)
 
AndrewSt said:
Not sure I can justify the cost of the 58, compared to the 35/85 combo. Definitely GAS but I love the unique look it has, especially for B&G portraits and engagement shoots etc.
Click to expand...
Same here. If this all works out then I think I'll find a way to get it, even if it is just selling my 2.8 zooms I'm not using.
 
anibap said:
I wouldn't as it is like five 2.8 prime lenses in one - 24, 28, 35, 50 and 70. Unless you need 1.4 or 1.8 and a lighter setup in some occasions.
Click to expand...
But we're not talking 2.8 primes so that's an odd way to look at it.

If my aunt was a man, she wouldn't be my aunt!
 
UaeExile said:
But we're not talking 2.8 primes so that's an odd way to look at it.
If my aunt was a man, she wouldn't be my aunt!
Click to expand...

Agree, but I am just saying if one does't need 1.8, 2.8 on the 24-70 is actually great professional quality top grade glass.

For me, the lens that is appealing from having 3 prime lenses in one is the Sigma 24-35 F2 Art. All three popular prime focal lengths covered. I have the 85 F1.8.
Nasim's review is tempting as it outperforms the 24 and 28 mm Nikon 1.8 primes at F2. The only downside is the weight and I wish Sigma would have gone bit wider - at least 20 mm.

This will be perfect for my travel needs. Another one I am looking at is Tamron 15-30 F2.8 VC as it is wider, but again weight is a concern for me.
 
anibap said:
Agree, but I am just saying if one does't need 1.8, 2.8 on the 24-70 is actually great professional quality top grade glass.

For me, the lens that is appealing from having 3 prime lenses in one is the Sigma 24-35 F2 Art. All three popular prime focal lengths covered. I have the 85 F1.8.
Nasim's review is tempting as it outperforms the 24 and 28 mm Nikon 1.8 primes at F2. The only downside is the weight and I wish Sigma would have gone bit wider - at least 20 mm.

This will be perfect for my travel needs. Another one I am looking at is Tamron 15-30 F2.8 VC as it is wider, but again weight is a concern for me.
Click to expand...

It is a great lens (I have one), but by the time my 1.4 prime hits 2.8 the sharpness and contrast blows the zoom out of the water. For me the prime versus zoom debate is all about whether you're prepared to sacrifice IQ and low light capability for convenience; that will be determined by what you shoot.
 
Last edited:
With any GAS talk you always need to weigh up whether the client can tell the 58 render from the 85 etc. You may be able to tell but your client paying wants solid shots. We always get fixated on new kit myself included buy always need to step back to see if it balances the outlay needed. I better go sit in the corner and cross out the 70-200, Sigma 35 and second body I want :cautious:
 
redlion said:
With any GAS talk you always need to weigh up whether the client can tell the 58 render from the 85 etc. You may be able to tell but your client paying wants solid shots. We always get fixated on new kit myself included buy always need to step back to see if it balances the outlay needed. I better go sit in the corner and cross out the 70-200, Sigma 35 and second body I want :cautious:
Click to expand...

I agree with your post, but.....I think sometines for photographers if they are earning from it, should buy what is best for their needs, as sometimes I see some posts where I feel they think like a hobbyist.

When I came out of H&S/Manufacturing and back on the tools as a Chippy, after initial start up I bought the best for my use and needs. I would buy Festool Tools, Rubi Tile Cutters etc........... I soon realised on my first bedroom design and fitting job using the Festool Plunge Saw and rail probably saved me a day in labour for two men, in all the ripping down of panels compared to using my old Dewalt or Skill saw.

I think with the 58mm Nikon (and others) it does have a certain style and if that fits in with the style of the photographer I think they should buy it, if it doesnt work out you can always sell on, like I could with my tools mentioned above. If the 58mm gives you what you want with regards to processing, nailing the photo first time it soon pays for itself.

In summary, it's using the right tool for the job of your needs.
 
The 58 does look like a cracking lens, I've been fallowing the FM thread since it started and in certain situations it does really shine. Owning the 85 1.4G I couldn't justify the huge outlay for what isn't far from the 85.
As others said I don't think anyone would be able to tell half of the time if it was shot with a 58 or 85 ,especially those with no interest. That said if i ever have extra cash needing spent i would love to pick one up.


For those that haven't read the thread or seen the post theres a comparison between the two half way down the page

http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1253369/159
 
pmac said:
The 58 does look like a cracking lens, I've been fallowing the FM thread since it started and in certain situations it does really shine. Owning the 85 1.4G I couldn't justify the huge outlay for what isn't far from the 85.
As others said I don't think anyone would be able to tell half of the time if it was shot with a 58 or 85 ,especially those with no interest. That said if i ever have extra cash needing spent i would love to pick one up.


For those that haven't read the thread or seen the post theres a comparison between the two half way down the page

http://www.fredmiranda.com/forum/topic/1253369/159
Click to expand...
Gotta love that 58 :)
 
I just want to know what software do people to use for conversion from Raw images to Jpeg in Nikon D750? I have only LR4 and is of no use.Any suggestions?
 
Been looking through the FM 58mm thread myself, really like a 50mm but 58 would work and it looks immense.

Rethinking my lens lineup at the moment, contemplating only primes for "normal" range (I'd take a zoom as an UWA or telephoto) and the possibility of a second body next year... I really like the D750 but I do miss the D800 sometimes....
 
nero said:
What about LR5?.I do not want to pay monthly subscriptions if I can avoid it.
Click to expand...
You can buy LR6 as a stand alone product.
 
 
I use LR6, it seems very slow to load up compared to LR5. Luckily, there is an update available to the latest version and it has made it a bit snappier. Very easy to use too.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top