thanksBob, that's worked very nicely. The colours are good and strong, a clean simple image. Shame about the Y not in your hand though![]()
I am rubbish at scrabble in fact I made dh go in the attic to find his borad we play it that much !!!cool shot, Scrabble is another one of my major time consumers, pity you didn't get photograph on the triple for 63 points!!!
Fanks again !!!Neat idea.
I like the fact you've got some good words on the board, really held my attention. You're getting quite good at this aren't you ?
Nice colours and composition too.
yeah as I said I didnt notice that until I looked at it at home else I would have taken anotherHi BOB
Sorry it's been a long time since I first commented. You have shown a big improvement week by week, your first shots were little more than snap shots but by chopped you are starting to get a lot better results. The final processing with the street shot works well, it was a shame about the map cutting across the leg. The Play shot is well thought out carring the photographic theme in the words.
![]()
thanks !!A good shot, good dof and pretty well lit.
I like the added interest of the words
Well done Bob,
Well thought out. Improving all the time.![]()

![]()
![]()
Wow! You've really raised the bar this week.
You can see how much thought you've put into the composition of this and it's paid off.
You've got a lovely clean background and the time spent arranging the board has worked brilliantly. I like the angle, I like the colours and I like your choice of words for the game.
I think you've done well with the lighting too. You've managed to keep the shadows from becoming too distracting and that bit of reflection at the top of the board actually adds a nice touch to the overall image.

Looks good and well done for taking it to manual. You'll learn lots and have more controlYou've not done badly here at all. The colours are bright on the charts and the viles are well lit and the coloured shadows are nice. Just a tad bright in the bottom left, but good effort
![]()
Well done for your first shot in manual
I can't believe how much your photography has come on since you posted your week 1 image!
And I really do like this a lot.
Lovely bright colours and nicely exposed. It almost looks like a product shot from a fish magazine but those translucent colour accents in the shadows give it an "arty" edge which works really well.
It looks like you've really cracked those clean white backgrounds too.
The only thing I'd consider changing would be to give it a but more DoF - just to get the words on the test charts a bit sharper.
BTW I hope that you've deliberately overcooked that nitrite test![]()

I like this a lot.
Not quite decided with the darkness - I like the way that the scene is lit with the firelight and in a lot of ways the selectively lit areas combined with the dim surroundings work really well. However, I would like to see a little bit more detail in some of the ironwork - particularly the parts in the main focal area of the image like the chains in front of the fire.
That's always going to be difficult though because they're backlit and almost silhouetted.
It's something that could be addressed to some extent in PP. What software do you use and do you shoot in RAW?
If you have the option you could play around in shadows/highlights in a new layer and selectively bring in some more detail in the areas that need it. Shooting in RAW will give you a bit more flexibility for this type of change.
If you're set on getting it right in camera, then I think you've set yourself a tricky task here. IMO increasing the brightness of the overall shot would lose a lot of the atmosphere from the flames and that's what makes the shot for me.
And I think you've done pretty much all you can to get as much light as possible through your camera settings anyway.
I don't know what lens you're using, but at anything faster than 1/60th a second you're likely to start risking motion blur if you're handheld and I'd guess that 4.5 is probably wide open for your aperture.
I'm not familiar with your camera, so I've got no idea how it performs at ISOs above 800.
In that kind of situation I guess your only lighting option is onboard flash . . . not something I've played with much, but if that was set at very low power it may have helped things / on the other hand it may have looked awful![]()
I love the candid shot just as it is. I think the darkness gives the fire a nice glow. To use a flash would spoil the candid nature of the shot. Well done.
I liked your chemistry shot and thought jeez whats the odd's lolI prefer your water test shot than my own I think. Chemistry is a winner for me but good job that wasn't a real nitrate test
I think you may be reading my mindI was going to use a blacksmith shot as well. That would have been too strange.
As it turned out I couldn't get a decent shot of the blacksmith at Blists Hill because there were too many people around.
On the other hand you have managed a cracking shot. Yes, it is a little dark but then again I suspect it was dark in there anyway. It adds to the atmosphere for me
Andy



thats cos nikon are the best !!!!!
see and you know how dark it is in there althoughit would have been good to compare the lighting of each if you had of got a shot
so where are you ?? telford ?


Stoke On Trent.
I have the 12 month passport ticket so expect more of my 52 to come from Ironbridge.
Some of my interior shots were dire today. My SB600 was behaving badly and each shot was about 3 stops too dark
I couldn't get bracketing to work eitherI wanted to play with HDR.
I guess I should have taken the instructions with me
Andy
me ?? i would never use a flash backwards :bonk:
I really like your chemistry shot Bob, the colours are great, really vibrant against the white.
Candid works as a shot but its a little too dark for me, its hard as if you expose the room more the fire will be blown, here's where you need a defused flash, or maybe even a full studio kit![]()
