- Messages
- 10,944
- Name
- Sophia aka Paul
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I guess the point is, that when the person is old enough to decide, they can specify it.
Biologically yes, it's pretty easy call.I kind of get what she is saying, but it is a strange world when the simple fact is that child is born an M or an F and not a U.
I would actually understand if the child was born defective of acturate parts.
And what does it say?Status of the "parent", says it all really.
And what does it say?
It says "not fit to breed".
That too, is b******t.she can't breed she doesn;t have a womb remember only proper woman have em.
Oh behave.It says "not fit to breed".
Sexual orientation is rarely a choice.Oh behave.
Someone can call themselves a unicorn and strap a cornetto to their head if they want, I don't care as long as it's hurting nobody. It's a choice the same as sexual orientation.
People get top het up about conforming to labels. I swear some live in a very beige world in their own heads.
Agreed. Poor choice of words on my part.Sexual orientation is rarely a choice.
As opposed to some weird old guys on the Internet enforcing their views on some people by not getting the point that its a free world and its not hurting anyone?Just some wierd old bird trying enforce her hippy values on the rest of us. Way to much time on her hands
Factually incorrect, please read about intersex conditions. Even ignoring biology, genitalia do not necessarily determine gender identity.It's bull crap
Non binary is bull crap
There are two sexes, male or female, end of.
The lost 2-1 in the court of appeal, but all three judges said the situation needed to change soon as it is discriminatory at present, the reason for the loss was that two judges accepted the government's position of "wait and see" regarding the continued uptake of civil partnerships among same sex couples before deciding what to do.Never said she was hurting anyone did ? There was a similar case last year involving a couple who didn't want to get married. They wanted a civil ceremony which is for same sex couples only. They cost the government and us tax payers millions just because they wanted to be different
Modern trend in who's world?Taking the modern trend of self assignment of sexual identity to it logical conclusion. she is clearly way ahead of us.
However I am not sure that all the many interlinked official administrative systems and databases, can yet accommodate such a radical change.
Nor is there sufficient legal and political will at an international level, for such a person to be universally catered for or recognised.
Modern trend in who's world?
How many people are signed up in this orderly queue then?
Nope fruitcakes, cranks and whack jobs.
Not alwaysBiologically yes, it's pretty easy call.
Its not always a simply biological observation.It is a simple biological observation, fruitcake.
If you fail to see the obvious, next time I am going to call you a racist if you disagree that sky is green and those winged creatures in the air are in fact flying pigs.