Well my comments are of a woman looking for a wedding photographer and not as another photographer. (Not getting married but that is the frame of mind I used when looking at the site) Please don't take offence at these comments but this is a womans view if i were looking to hire a photographer for my wedding
I like the font and the colour of the font. I don't like the header of Image World, the M looks like an N. The colouring is fine but it needs to be more simple rather than slanted.
A couple of things about the pricing and product. These are things I would look at and consider and would mean the difference between hiring yourself or another photographer.
The pricing between Topaz and Emerald is an extra £400 yet from the description the only difference would be pics of me getting ready. I would not pay an extra £400 for that. If you do get more than just this is needs to be noted.
Also the price across the range goes for £350 - £1200 yet despite which one I choose I would still get 40 pics. If I am paying £1200 and the photographer is there all day at that cost I would want more than 40 (I know you get the mini ones for parents but I would still want more for myself) so I can pay £350 and get 40 pics or I could pay £1200 and still get 40 pics.
On the schools bit this comment stands out to me ' The photographer will not smoke or act badly whilst in the prescence of children' If hiring a professional I think I would assume this anyway, don't think it needs stating. It would put me off hiring though I cannot pin point why.
The portrait prices get a bit repetative.
How about having a main sentance with the size and prices below like this:
Quality framed images complete with mount in a choice of colours. Frame options: Glossy black, Champagne gold, silver,Gold, Teak or natural wood.
7" x 5" £50
9" x 6" £70
10" x 7" £100
etc
I looked at the site when this thread was at around 2 pages and it has definately improved and is alot more viewer friendly now
