Woman wants photo I took of her Husband and child deleted and not posted. Is she in her right?

She most certainly does have a right to ask... not to demand though.


Steve.
How does she? The photo was taken in a public place and doesn't show any faces (not that it would also matter if it did) so she has no rights (the law also states this I believe). However I'm unsure why this is still being discuss as it's old news now. The pic got removed by the group admin who banned the photographer but now seem to have allowed him back into the group however I bet the pic is still in the public domain as it would have every right to be. Also I believe that the parents actually asked the op if they could have a copy of the photo.
 
How does she? The photo was taken in a public place and doesn't show any faces (not that it would also matter if it did) so she has no rights (the law also states this I believe). However I'm unsure why this is still being discuss as it's old news now. The pic got removed by the group admin who banned the photographer but now seem to have allowed him back into the group however I bet the pic is still in the public domain as it would have every right to be. Also I believe that the parents actually asked the op if they could have a copy of the photo.

She has a right to ASK, as does anyone, about anything.
 
Anyone has a right to ask anyone anything, legal or not, ethical or not. You don't have to comply though.


Steve.
 
How does she? The photo was taken in a public place and doesn't show any faces (not that it would also matter if it did) so she has no rights (the law also states this I believe). However I'm unsure why this is still being discuss as it's old news now. The pic got removed by the group admin who banned the photographer but now seem to have allowed him back into the group however I bet the pic is still in the public domain as it would have every right to be. Also I believe that the parents actually asked the op if they could have a copy of the photo.

She has every right to ask.

If someone asked me to do something and gave a sound reason for me doing it then just because I don't have to do it doesn't mean I wont do it.
 
Haven't read this thread right till the end but what would I do? I'd block her and him from fb. I would prob remove the pic too. Wait till next tide and get a better shot. We only live once and the hassle is biting into you lifetime.....just a thought.
 
its a great phot by the way
Thanks Jez!

Flicked on FB late last night and saw some of the fallout from the FB group. Obviously didn't get to see the photo has it had been removed by that time. Nice image Chad! and one that most of us would have grabbed. Unfortunately our small Island sometimes suffers from small mindedness.
Thanks Speedy! And yes I was removed from the group, madness.
 
So every time some troll tells you to do something you will crawl away and do whatever they say? It's his photo and he might think it's a great shot not that that is relevant either way. If approached properly and asked to remove it because 'insert reason' then fine but in this instance none of that happened.
As FB have removed it it's all a bit academic now anyway.
If it included a clear view of both of their faces, Inmost probably would have taken it down, but seeing as it doesn't and they're facing away from the camera, i didn't see the problem.

And the irony of this whole situation is that if the parents hadn't made themselves known, then no-one would have ever known who they were.
THIS.
 
Chad, I haven't had a chance to read this thread in full and therefore it's very likely the others have already said what I'm about to say. I will not have to point out that there are no restrictions placed upon photography in a public place, nor are there any separate laws for minors, nor does it matter if they are the main subject of the photo or unidentifiable elements (as they are in your picture). Therefore you can publish this photograph how you wish and you can even sell it for newsworthy, educational, or artistic purposes. The only exceptions would be if you were portraying them in a derogatory manner, or if it was an invasion of privacy (like if you'd done a sneaky shot of somebody in a public toilet) or using the photograph commercially (this would mean using it to advertise a product or service, in which case you would need their permission). Therefore if you are using it to promote yourself then their opinion has some merit, but if this represents your personal work and is distinct from your commercial work then they do not have any grounds to insist that you take down the photograph. The fact the subjects are not even recognisable makes their complaint seem even more strange.

I would respond very politely (I think it's important to acknowledge anything like this) and ask why they feel there is an problem (because there is certainly no legal issue).

However, even though you have done nothing wrong, you can still decide whether or not you intend to remove the image simply as a matter of courtesy (this can often be the best option, particularly if the image has no value to you). But if you do this, you should also make it very clear at the same time that you are under no obligation to, and it is a favour. I have had this happen to me before, and I understand how frustrating it can be.

EDIT: just read the bit about Facebook. Sigh. An ignorant and misguided response, unfortunately typical of 'social networking'. I would agree with previous advice to send a message to the administrator of that particular page, explaining the position. However I suspect they are objecting to the fact you did not remove the picture immediately, as per their demand.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top