Byker28i
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 21,339
- Edit My Images
- Yes
To be fair - if you look at his website he does say that some of his shots "may" have been taken under controlled conditions...like most of them!!![]()
Oh I think his bee shot was wild
Good luck to the bloke. he did not lie and he has got far more "exposure" than most of us will ever have. I just think that many comments etc here are from people who have never been "involved" with a story in a Paper. You provide facts or lies and they do a grand job of coming up with their own version!
I did a story with the Times many years ago that involved the security services etc. The conversation i had with the reporter after ,was "heated" to say the least . It was about 20% what i told them and 80% made up to make the story sexier .
Welcome back Luke.
The story was in the Metro, Mail and Telegraph yesterday, so someone syndicated the pics around? Nice work and maybe a little payback for his $500 a time to shoot each animal for an hour. I deal with our local paper and haven't a huge issue with stories changing, but I do know the tabloids need a certain angle, but the same wording was published in all three articles so obviously came with the photo's to make the story more interesting to the editors.
For me, it's just tainted what are after all excellent shots and he'd have got away for it as well it it hadn't of been for those pesky
I took this photo in the Wamasouri jungle just south of the Himilayan Mountains last week

