Why bother?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Having picked up a few comments along the way, I can say that 30 images is waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too many, I would get to number 5 and hit back because I just cant be arsed.

The only time (IMO) you can post more than 10 pics in a thread is for a wedding, but thats just me. Keep the image count below 4, and you'll soon get comments, good AND bad :D
 
If he wants to back up his opinion with something better from roughly the same subject then I'm happy to stand corrected, until then his damning opinion counts for nothing.


:lol::lol::lol:
 
sorry, one step ahead of you already...might have to go a long way to get a better dummy spit:nuts:
Oh noes the moderator is having a dig because he can. Better not have a go back else he'll ban me :wave:
 
At the end of the day, there are too many photos to comment on, I post pictures and the most comments I get is generally 3-4 with loads of views, but it doesn't get me down, if there were brilliant people would comment but that's life, I'm sorry but get over it.
It's a shame that people have ruined the idea of this thread by making it about the photos I have posted when I was specifically trying to avoid that and concentrate on how annoying it can be to get no interest whatsoever.

You'd think that having every topic covered in it's on subsection in each forum that people would've learned how this kind of forum works by now.

Oh well :(
 
You're missing my point. He hasn't critiqued them, he's just basically said that they're crap. If he wants me to accept that then I'll be happy to once he's shown me something of his own thats better.

You've misinterpreted my point then, or maybe I could've worded it better. He's dismissed my photos just like that but there are some top notch captures on display there. If he wants to back up his opinion with something better from roughly the same subject then I'm happy to stand corrected, until then his damning opinion counts for nothing.

The first reply DD made indicated that he appricated some of the shots and that you could PP a bit to improve more of them. PP means a lot of things, for me, a simple crop is still PP. How about you? (And yes, a few crops here and there could really improve the images you posted.)

He did not initially dismiss them regardless of what you have convinced yourself, and if you actually go back and read the first few posts you will only realise that it was after the attitude you chucked back that things went downhill.
 
Nope I take photos for use on my website. I occasionally show a few off on here or on one or two other forums. I also dabble in video and find it much more time consuming but worthwhile in the end.

So why go on about all the effort you put in and relate it to whether or not you get replies on here? :thinking:
 
So you really were just looking for a quick ego massage.
Nope but it would've been nice to see a remark or two.

I've posted a number of threads of the same iolk, obviously from different matches and they've had replies so when I looked at the forum after I got in from work earlier and saw no replies I thought "Why bother"? Hence the creation of this thread :)
 
bearing in mind that DD is a professional photographer of the highest standard and is probably better placed to judge a good photo from a bad one than a lot of us here

He may be a professional photographer but is he a professional sports or football photographer ?

If so, then in keeping with the preferred forum ethos that regulars so often harp on about, maybe DD should offer some constructive criticism as to why he believes Tigers images are "no good" !?!

If not, then IMO I don't believe DD is better placed to judge a good football photo from a bad one.
 
Oh noes the ADMINISTRATOR is having a dig because he can. Better not have a go back else he'll ban me :wave:

Ban? where is the fun in that? Custom user title..now thats what you want.

;)
 
You got some replies on there now :)
 
there is a limit of 10 pics per post for a reason. no need for 30+ images

i agree with DD on this one, sorry
 
Nope but it would've been nice to see a remark or two.

I've posted a number of threads of the same iolk, obviously from different matches and they've had replies so when I looked at the forum after I got in from work earlier and saw no replies I thought "Why bother"? Hence the creation of this thread :)

Mate, I admire anybody who will stand their own ground, but sometimes you just gotta let it go and back off......:thumbs:
 
Having picked up a few comments along the way, I can say that 30 images is waaaaaaaaaaaaaaay too many, I would get to number 5 and hit back because I just cant be arsed.

The only time (IMO) you can post more than 10 pics in a thread is for a wedding, but thats just me. Keep the image count below 4, and you'll soon get comments, good AND bad :D
I'm sure it's 21. I had a browse through my gallery, picked out the ones in chronological order that I thought were interesting, added a caption or description and then pasted them into the forum with links back to flickr as their t&c's request.

Believe it or not it takes quite a while to create a thread like that, hence the reason I was disappointed that no-one commented.
 
Ban? where is the fun in that? Custom user title..now thats what you want.

;)
Do you have to be really bad to get one of those then?
*eyes the folks who have them with a degree of suspicion*
 
there is a limit of 10 pics per post for a reason. no need for 30+ images

i agree with DD on this one, sorry
7 in each post, x3 = 21.

Agree with him regarding the quality of my photos? Maybe you'd care to crit them in the appropriate thread and I'll be happy to try to amend my ways.
 
Do you have to be really bad to get one of those then?
*eyes the folks who have them with a degree of suspicion*

Or disagree with the admin guys about stuff.........:lol:

Check mine out......:razz:
 
The first reply DD made indicated that he appricated some of the shots and that you could PP a bit to improve more of them. PP means a lot of things, for me, a simple crop is still PP. How about you? (And yes, a few crops here and there could really improve the images you posted.)
They are cropped. I take cropping and sharpening as read. I consider his suggestion of tweaking the levels as OTT.
 
What did you do to get that name :lol::lol:

I didn`t share the admin guys love of chrsitmas ,New Years eve nor any of the festive period.

Before that I was "newbie botherer" ,after a difference of opinion with somebody,and before that, my first one, was "otter botherer"......:shrug:
 
7 in each post, x3 = 21.

Agree with him regarding the quality of my photos? Maybe you'd care to crit them in the appropriate thread and I'll be happy to try to amend my ways.

coming on here and "blowing your own trumptet" isn't a good thing

top notch pics? some are ok yes, but if there so "top notch" where are the premier league pics?

couple of crit - pic 1, someones hair? i cant see the point, its football, pic 4 would look better with the ref cropped out, will look through the rest in abit
 
They are cropped. I take cropping and sharpening as read. I consider his suggestion of tweaking the levels as OTT.

he made a suggestion as to what he thinks can be improved, so stop goading him. He doesnt like them, get over it.

If you want comments, post less, if you want critique, stick 1 in crit.
 
I`m going for a beer now, what odds on this thread being locked upon my return?.........:naughty:
 
This thread serves a useful purpose, it shows me how not to post. :)
 
I think the original question has probably being answered a few times over now, and now it seems people are just popping in to have a random dig.

This also isn't really the place for comments on the photos ;)
 
I think the original question has probably being answered a few times over now, and now it seems people are just popping in to have a random dig.

This also isn't really the place for comments on the photos ;)


:razz:
 
dont you just hate it when someone else gets the last word
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top