When wierdos favourite your pics on Flickr

My most viewed pic is one of my daughter:



Bit of an odd pic to be that popular really

They might have said that about Cartier Bresson's similar picture, but that is pretty iconic...
 
I'm not sure if they're weirdos, but there have been 104 views of my friends wellies:

2235512642_5bdc25eece_o.jpg


Maybe I'm the weird one for taking the photo.:thinking:
 
This one is my most viewed on flickr. got someone who has added it as a favourite, dunno why though?


To be fair, after looking at it, the tags do include, "big breasted," "good looking blonde," "sexy," and "hot." :lol:
 
The T&C's on Flickr state that if you show the image elsewhere, you must provide a link back to the photo PAGE on flickr, not a link to the image.

so that simple URL thing doesnt work, and it's something that we can't do for you automatically.

You put the actual URL of the image inbetween image tags, then you must provide a link to the actual photo page (the part of your profile), not just a clickable link to the picture again.

We use BBCode...and they could easily implement a box with a BBCode link in, with a link back...and Flickr users have been crying out for this functionality for years....but Flickr have chosen to ignore those requests.

;)

Sorry to drag up an old thread, but for anyone who uses Flickr, and also uses Firefox, get Greasemonkey and install this script - http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/4771

Generates the BB code for you.

Example here
 
2310412860_72662c8b3e.jpg


My most viewed image buy a long shot (208 over 89!)

However, the following is my most faved...

2413357781_0fc896a0aa.jpg


So nothing perverse about those! Haha!
 
6985 views for this one of mine on Flickr, very random...

165538627_Y2W3H-M.jpg


and 48 favourites for this one...

138809969_W2VM2-M.jpg


I was wondering why certain pictures got huge viewing numbers, and Flickr is actually quite helpful in that respect. Go to "Your Stats", click on an image and you can see exactly where the views have come from, right down to specific threads on forums etc. The vast majority of my highly viewed photos have been found via Yahoo Image Search.

It's one of those places where you get what you put in though, I know a few people who crave views/comments/favourites, and they work the system really well to boost that as much as possible. Yet you can also find truly breathtaking images where hardly anyone has viewed them. My main concern is making sure I tag my images with the lens I used, as I'm forever searching for 'Sigma 50-150' or 'Nikon 10.5' etc to get an idea of what a specific lens is capable with.
 
My main concern is making sure I tag my images with the lens I used, as I'm forever searching for 'Sigma 50-150' or 'Nikon 10.5' etc to get an idea of what a specific lens is capable with.

Im exactly the same, the more tags you have, the more views you get. Not that its all about getting the views etc, but its just nice having your photo looked at.

I must admit when i first started on flickr, i didnt bother tagging anything, and just got the views from the groups i was in etc, but now i have seen large numbers of google searches and yahoo searches. Its always nice to know people from the outside are looking in :)
 
My most viewed pic is

moon_morning.jpg


Grand total of 9 views :shrug:

So how do you promote your flickr account?

Only 1 pic selected as someones favourite which is

plant.jpg


No idea why..... :D

Neil
 
So how do you promote your flickr account?

I make my pictures easier to find, based on what I would want to see if searching for something.

The main two things are to tag your images, and to add your photos to groups. I always try to tag my images with the camera make and model I used, a description of the lens (e.g. "Sigma 120-300"), then a bit of basic info about the photo (e.g. Vauxhall Astra, Castle Combe Circuit)

I don't find a lot of the groups that useful, but it' worth adding your better shots to relevant groups. After an event at Castle Combe, for example, I always pick out a few of the better ones and chuck them in the Castle Combe group.

I've no idea if those things work, I don't use it for promotion as such, more to try and be useful. As I mentioned a few posts up, I love sitting on Flickr for ah hour or so occasionally and just searching for something, be it a specific lens or location, I therefore tag my images based on the assumption that there are others who use Flickr in the same way.
 
I make my pictures easier to find, based on what I would want to see if searching for something.

The main two things are to tag your images, and to add your photos to groups. I always try to tag my images with the camera make and model I used, a description of the lens (e.g. "Sigma 120-300"), then a bit of basic info about the photo (e.g. Vauxhall Astra, Castle Combe Circuit)

I don't find a lot of the groups that useful, but it' worth adding your better shots to relevant groups. After an event at Castle Combe, for example, I always pick out a few of the better ones and chuck them in the Castle Combe group.

I've no idea if those things work, I don't use it for promotion as such, more to try and be useful. As I mentioned a few posts up, I love sitting on Flickr for ah hour or so occasionally and just searching for something, be it a specific lens or location, I therefore tag my images based on the assumption that there are others who use Flickr in the same way.

Thanks for that - I'll spend a bit of time tagging etc :thumbs:
 
Woah! How long did it take to get that many views?

Just over a year I think. Looking at the stats it gets a good solid 20 or more hits a day from Yahoo Image Search, so I imagine there is some search term that brings it up quite highly ("Ford GT" or something)

Lots of my Goodwood Festival of Speed pics are a bit like that (a good 10 or more with 1000+ views), I guess it's quite rare to see 'action' pics of some of those cars.

I don't usually take any notice to be honest, they aren't my best pics by a long way, comments and/or favourites are usually a better indicator of quality (unless you are one of those people that submits your pics to the 'comment on 5 and move along' type groups)
 
(unless you are one of those people that submits your pics to the 'comment on 5 and move along' type groups)

I got caught by one of those last night as I'd forgotten why I hadn't posted to RAW Street Photography for a while.

Logged on this morning - 3 comments for a pic, lovely.

Opened pic. Three logos with no further comment blinking back at me.:nono:
 
I dont think those 'comment and move on' groups are completely pointless. I was fave'd by one only yesterday, and my pic was 3 pages into the group.

Regarding stats... My most popular is also down to Google image search. But when i follow the link in the stats, I can't even find my pic :shrug:
 
My "most viewed" pic is Travis Pastrana on the MacRae Stages:



But this is the most favourited:



No wierdos either. Maybe it's my smell?
 
And just how do we put a link to our flickr site..... step by step for nunce please!

Easy-peasy:)

[URL="http://www.flickr.com/photos/YOUR-FLICKR-USERNAME]What you want it to say on screen[/URL

Change the red bits, and add a ] to the end.
 
This one is my most viewed on flickr. got someone who has added it as a favourite, dunno why though?



I can't see why they'd make it a fave either. Afterall, the composition isn't great, the highlights are blown and there's practically no detail in the sky at all.

Some people eh, you just can't understand them can you.
 
heres my most viewed



and most favourited (is that a word?)



see a theme brewing, ive only taken one good pic apparently LOL
 
My most viewed:



2nd most viewed:



I like Flickr, but do hate it at times. 90% of the people on there are morons who just post crap photos of their dogs and just post stupid ugly GIFs all over your comments becuase they saw your photo in a group.

Seriously, most of the photos on Flickr are utter rubbish.
 
I've had a fair few people on deviantART favourite my nude/lingerie work, and they've got no owkr of their own and their fav galleries are full of nothing but naked/near naked women, but I only generally block the people who leave lewd comments. If all someone can contribute to a site is franticly clicking 'add as favourite' then that's up to them, it's their choice to be a loser. Apart from the people who have a legitimate fascination with that type of photography, who are unfortunately labelled as perverts. But as I understand it that group is sadly a minority.
 
Back
Top