I thought he described a nice and we'll build version; really read what he wrote. It only gets load under load. Not something you can do in a build up area.
The new RS is very impressive, for me I don't like the boy racer style exterior. But also after having had my Golf R for two years now, I'm glad to go back to something more comfortable. I can't begin to imagine how the RS would be for a daily driver
You don't see any of the previous RS models on the road much. I think most are locked up in garages and not used as daily drives.The new RS is very impressive, for me I don't like the boy racer style exterior. But also after having had my Golf R for two years now, I'm glad to go back to something more comfortable. I can't begin to imagine how the RS would be for a daily driver
There could be another reason for that with the previous model
the current one has a drivetrain much more suited for that. 
Many people think the looks are too subdued, I reckon they have got it just right, not too wild, but just enough to be different to the ST, but functional styling too.The new RS is very impressive, for me I don't like the boy racer style exterior. But also after having had my Golf R for two years now, I'm glad to go back to something more comfortable. I can't begin to imagine how the RS would be for a daily driver
Other than the RS200, all the RS models have been family cars, some small, some large, but still family cars none the less.
Just got to do your sums. On my Golf R I was quoted £35+vat extra per month. Yet in the two years and 24,000 it would only require a single service which is £150 after some phoning around.
luckily my waist line is in good shape I love the snug feel of the seats in the Golf R and our Mercedes GL AMG (with active side bolster support).
It's not my kind of car, but I just noticed a special deal on a Citroen C4 Cactus which is for £89+VAT and absolute steal. That is seriously a lot of car for your money if you can live with the looks. For the savings I could almost be swayed and I know others absolutely love the look.
Excellent. Probably as good as it gets value for money wise. I do like the ds3 (if I was younger) and the ds4. But not the cactus. But that is ok, as it would be boring if we all like the same thing.
Just looked at the seats on their website, http://www.ford.co.uk/cs/BlobServer...cation/pdf&blobwhere=1214549794657&blobkey=id , looks like two are just different levels of trim based what looks the same or very similar to my ST3. The other whilst still a recliner is a highback but styled like a proper race car seat, plenty of support but less padding.
And the Diane was the luxury version, I had the 2CV. I don't know some people don't realise how good they had it
You don't know what Ford sell all their Options finance and mobility vehicles do you? Do they go to BCA?
And the Diane was the luxury version, I had the 2CV. I don't know some people don't realise how good they had it
A friends dad had the SM. Now that was a fun car. He then helped us transplant the engine into a VW Camper van that we used to transport our baseball team. Unfortunately the mounts snapped about 160km away from home. Oops.
Ah that was you was it?
I never understood the point of five seater mpv. To me it seem to be a compromise in every sense of the word. I just don't get them.Ah that was you was it?
I hired a Picasso in France once, once was enough, never again!
Me, the ex, 2 kids and daughters boy friend, lets see, one, two, three, four plus one = five
Me, the ex, 2 kids and daughters boy friend, lets see, one, two, three, four plus one = five
Yeah but which one goes in the boot?bigger boot room too
Exactly, thank you very much. I must possess female logicCan get that many in the A4.....bigger boot room too
Well it seemed like a good idea at the time
