Whats better Nikon Or Canon?

nikon here and always have been but that 5dmk2 is a real tool. for me it would be the best value for money camera on the market, fact.
hopefully nikon will sort it out soon
 
r1andy said:
nikon here and always have been but that 5dmk2 is a real tool. for me it would be the best value for money camera on the market, fact.
hopefully nikon will sort it out soon
Click to expand...


I think they did...a few years ago...
 
Arkady said:
I think they did...a few years ago...
Click to expand...


to the best of my knowledge the only nikon body that comes close 2 the 5dmk2 is the d3x and at £4800 its a massive price difference, and still the mk2 has less noise at high iso.
dpreview shows it against the d700 in their tests and the 2 bodies r not in the same league

dont want to offend anyone, as i said i only use nikon but they need 2 raise the game again 2 stay on top IMO.
cheers
 
r1andy said:
to the best of my knowledge the only nikon body that comes close 2 the 5dmk2 is the d3x and at £4800 its a massive price difference, and still the mk2 has less noise at high iso.
dpreview shows it against the d700 in their tests and the 2 bodies r not in the same league

dont want to offend anyone, as i said i only use nikon but they need 2 raise the game again 2 stay on top IMO.
cheers
Click to expand...

:lol:
 
Well since I use D3 and D3x bodies, that's all right then...
I wouldn't know about the cheaper models...lol
 
r1andy said:
nikon here and always have been but that 5dmk2 is a real tool. for me it would be the best value for money camera on the market, fact.
hopefully nikon will sort it out soon
Click to expand...

If you define resolution as the only thing that counts.
 
Julie1979 said:
I'll sit on the fence here.

I love my D700 but have only ever used Nikon SLR's so it's really all I know. I also love the Canon G10 that we use for diving.
Click to expand...

Canon's rugged compacts blow the competition completely out of the water, both literally and metaphorically. A few months ago, Digital Photo did a comparative review of six rugged compacts. The example photos taken underwater were most illuminating. Or, in some cases, not. The Canon was the winner on image quality by a long margin. One of the others (I can't unfortunately remember which manufacturer) was quite good, two were unacceptably bad and the final two were a sick joke.
 
I :love: Canon & Nikon! :naughty::lol::p I'm a Bicamera :lol::p
 
Hi
I was a Canon man for 25 years before changing to Nikon.
These are my thoughts, Canon produce very tight well rounded cameras which i felt were well priced and worked well with L glass lenses.
I found the AF to be very poor compared to the Nikon and the total lack of user control with only simple basic menus.

I found Nikon to be more suitable to me as the D300 is well equiped with AF, good image quality at high ISO and the camera can be customised with the extensive menus far greater than the Canon.

For me i would say if you are looking for a creative camera and you have a bit of knowledge go with a NIkon and never look back, however a Canon is a better choice as a first SLR, but this is just my opinion.
 
Daryl said:
Pentax? someone was rumoured to have one, but that was just a rumour.....
Click to expand...

No, it's true! Beautiful work from the top of a mountain with her 67II.
 
I personally prefer canon high end more than nikon but then i hate all amateur canons such as the 300D right up to the 1000D same with nikon if your going for nikon go for a high end one like a D300 or something same with canon best to look at them first though
 
yeah I'll have the Hassleblad if i can afford it
 
My opinion is that you should buy whatever your mate has so you can share lenses etc.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top