Or am I just a grumpy old man today![]()

You've answered your own question there grandpa
DD
Or am I just a grumpy old man today![]()
Just thinking......
Could be to do with the different technologies at work?
A photograph being created by light falling on film and then being printed using chemicals, light and voodoo.
Wheras as an "Image" is more a likeness created by electrical impulses. Could this also reflect that in most cases a digital image is open to more manipulation than a photograph? Eg cloning out undesirable elements adding bits here and there?
In which case would an airbrushed photograph count as an image (as it's been manipulated) or would it still be a photograph or both?
Now I'm more confused. Think I should lie down for a bit.
With my cameras I create photographs. Why has the word "image" taken over? If it's a laziness thing then what about "photo?"
Could be to do with the different technologies at work?
I'm lazy and use pic
If they are images are we then imagers rather than photographers...
Let loose the dogs of snapshots!
With my cameras I create photographs. Why has the word "image" taken over? If it's a laziness thing then what about "photo?"
Does "image" sound a bit more sexy? A bit more trendy?
Or am I just a grumpy old man today![]()
It depends how often I am writing it in a sentence as I try not to use the same word too many times, so use variations of it.

It doesn't really matter what it's called. Unless you still refer to your car as your automobile.![]()
trust you to come up with that analogy Recommend anything by Patrick Maynard on photographic technologies for in-depth discussion of what constitutes a photo. </philosophy>
I'd say it comes from the digital age where a photograph taken and stored on a digital file on a computer is called an "image file". It'd be odd to call a jpeg or a tiff (tagged IMAGE file format) a "photograph file".

I wouldn't want to disappoint now Dawn.![]()

A photograph is any picture, digital or otherwise that what taken with a camera. Though overly 'shopped etc I'd not count (I don't mean levels, I mean a smurf being humped by a dog)
Actually, not according to Adobe - and I think we can probably use them as definers of the process.
In Lightroom you "import photos", not "import images".

I'd kinda like to explore the thought that a key everyday PS action outside of levels could involve smurf dog sex.....and if it were smurf dog sex but "converted to mono", could anybody tell it wasn't two shopped consenting dogs doing what comes natural in the privacy of their own bit of wasteland.
I mean more than once I've caught myself not recognising smurfs in various states of undress when they are pictured in B/W, it seems if it looks ok, who's to know ??
except the smurf....
who doubtless enjoys the attention..
![]()
