On a few occasions at the hotel we stayed in over the last couple of weeks in Madeira, a young couple with an 18 month old daughter sat at an adjacent table. They looked like they were from southern Europe ...olive-skinned. I noticed that the little girl,who was just about able to walk holding a parent's hand, had a stud in one ear and a round 'stud' the size of small button in the other. I asked my wife how they made them stay on. She said ear-piercing. The reason I asked was that whilst being aware that females have their ears pierced and a pin is pushed through the lobe with a stud or whatever on the end, I couldn't believe that a parent would do that to such a small child. It must hurt .My wife told me it would have been done using a local anaesthetic. I was shocked tbh... and a bit angry. My wife then told me that it's quite common. What ? At 18 months old ? She said that some parents have it done to babies. Unbelievable. No child should have that done to them until they decide themselves and only when they reach the age of..say..14..minimum. To do that to a baby, and in this case an 18 month old child is, imo, a form of child abuse. The reason I mentioned where they were possibly from..,ie southern Europe. is maybe it's a tradition there. I can understand, but still don't agree, that it happens in tribes from the likes of the Amazon or deepest, darkest Africa etc..but Europe ?
It's illegal in the UK to tattoo anyone under the age of 18 so why is it legal to punch a hole in a bay's ear or that of a small child ? Even on a practical level, as the child's ear grows that hole is not going to be where it is at the time of piercing. It's like tattoos, what are those going to look like when a person gets old and their skin shrinks and wrinkles ?
I can't understand why there isn't a law against ear-piercing here...or even Europe for that matter, as we share a common culture .