- Messages
- 14,819
- Name
- Richard
- Edit My Images
- No
The go compare ad on TV has been saying that insurances are due to DROP this year.
And I didn't believe it either..
I did try gocompare but the quotes were way higher than my renewal price.
The go compare ad on TV has been saying that insurances are due to DROP this year.
And I didn't believe it either..
It think they were saying generally across the board and something about refunding the £250 excess.I did try gocompare but the quotes were way higher than my renewal price.
The driving courses I went on when in the police taught us to drive defensively and how to be aware of everything that was happening around you, both on and near the road. Reading the road/traffic ahead was one of the main way of avoiding problems before they arose.
Yep, even after 40 years, many of the habits I learned then are still with me.Very similar to what I was taught on the IAM courses. The big thing with a bike in traffic was to look at the driver and the positioning of the wheels, it gives you an insight into whether they are looking to "jump lanes" quickly. Something I still maintain in the car today.
Simply do what parents do with their baby buggies at the roadside, push the bin out first and see if anything hits it, if not it’s safe to cross.
They're probably too little to care...Yes. That's very true. When I see a mum..it's usually mum.. with a buggy with a child in..at vehicle exhaust level..btw.waiting at the kerbside with 6" of the front of the buggy over the kerb/gutter I think what an unsafe thing to do but most do it. The only safe thing to do is to wait with all the buggy on the footpath until the nearest car is a decent distance away but that's not always practical with our busy roads. You haver to wonder what baby or toddler thinks.
Perhaps it enjoys the Adrenalin rush?You haver to wonder what baby or toddler thinks.
I’d rather read something from someone that is respected and has experience than someone with just an English degree but yes the editor should of correctedJournalists using the wrong homophones. Why don't motoring writers know the difference between brakes and breaks? Photography writers should know the difference between flair and flare. These words are the tools of their trade so they should have the correct ones in their toolboxes.
Your post peaked my interest because when I took a pique at it it appears you have employed a grammatical error that stands at the peek of all those that are annoyingI’d rather read something from someone that is respected and has experience than someone with just an English degree but yes the editor should of corrected

I doubt it - they are restricted to 15mph and the only time I have been above 30mph on a bike has been down big hills and its scary!I was putting out the bins on the grass verge (between the pavement and the road..a metre wide) at about 5.30pm..so it was dark. As I turned to walk back across the pavement and down the drive I heard a whirr very close to me and saw a light and a flash of yellow (Hi-Viz jacket) of man on an electric bike as he came off the pavement a couple of paces from me across our 3m wide concrete 'drive in' off the road for our cars across the verge and onto the road and went off at what I estimated to be at least 30mph. That really was a near miss. When I put the bins out I can't turn to walk across the pavement in one manoeuvre. I have to first turn..check the pavement both ways for cyclists then walk across it and onto our drive.
I bet it’s simple to mod a leccy bike to go faster than 15mph.I doubt it - they are restricted to 15mph and the only time I have been above 30mph on a bike has been down big hills and its scary!
Well that’s not a surprise! I just read a reference that says some off-road bikes can go faster with the flick of a switch.Apparently it is, as well as the ability to turn them from electrically assisted to electrically powered.
Surely the ability to use the language correctly is an indicator of good abilitiy in anyone writing for a living?I’d rather read something from someone that is respected and has experience than someone with just an English degree but yes the editor should of corrected

Yo jus sum kina grama nassy, in yo!Your post peaked my interest because when I took a pique at it it appears you have employed a grammatical error that stands at the peek of all those that are annoying![]()
I’m not sure but that looks like it should have query not a bang, thusly: “in yo?”Yo jus sum kinda grama nassy, in yo!![]()
It's the accusative case.I’m not sure but that looks like it should have query not a bang, thusly: “in yo?”

I hoped you might find that annoying which would give you a chance to make a new post in this threadIt's the accusative case.
(I hope to get away with this as few people know what the accusitive case is and even fewer that there is none in English).
(OK, there is the oblque case, which merges the accusitve and dative but that's getting too picky, even for for me).
I sometimes wish we'd never started something!![]()
![]()
![]()
.I doubt it - they are restricted to 15mph and the only time I have been above 30mph on a bike has been down big hills and its scary!
I bet it’s simple to mod a leccy bike to go faster than 15mph.
I hoped you might find that annoying which would give you a chance to make a new post in this thread.
I did Latin for 6 years at school so ought to be up on the accusative but I’ve tried fairly successfully to forget all that. ㋡.
It wan’t a choice. It was a Grammar School (around 600 boys as I recall) and each year was ‘streamed’. Very occasionally people were moved between streams but not by their choice as fas as I recall. Streams were supposed to be equal but were generally thought not to be and differentiated by the foreign languages Latin > Greek > (can’t recall, Spanish maybe) > German. All did French. The “lowest“ stream did wood/metal work though in substitute for what I can’t recall. Completely bonkers arrangement really except that it was a good school and everything seemed to work.Not wishing to denigrate your learning experience,Richard but on reflection do you not think the school would have benefited the pupils more had so much time spent learning Latin not been put into learning something useful ? They say Latin was only useful for those wanting to become doctors.
Unbelievably, Latin is enjoying 'a resuscitatio'but as far as I'm concerned for a less than useless reason. It's being reintroduced into Secondary schools in England so that it sheds it's elitist reputation at a cost of £4 million
Gavin Williamson said it helps pupils/students to learn not only english language but other laguages. I learnt German..written spoken and reading without the help of Latin. He said that school children will go on trips to Roman heritage sites to help with a greater understanding of classics. We need engineers, tradesmen, graphic designers. Ok, pharmacists, doctors and nurses might need Latin but it would be better to anglicise prescriptions. Maybe more Latin in the medical world than I appreciate but nevertheless...Granted there are terms we use in daily life like Status Quo; Mea Culpa; De facto; Bona fide; Ad infinitum ; Per se etc etc but to be honest I think many people use those expressions not realising they come from Latin.
Guardian article dated July 31st 2021: https://www.theguardian.com/education/2021/jul/31/latin-introduced-40-state-secondaries-england
I learnt German..written spoken and reading without the help of Latin.
I agree and don’t know what’s done nowadays though I think it would be better to get pupils actually learning to speak and write in one modern foreign language rather than just pass exams in two or more.Latin's not much help with German but it is with some other European languages.
English" has its roots in Latin.
Should that be "but yes the editor should have corrected" ?I’d rather read something from someone that is respected and has experience than someone with just an English degree but yes the editor should of corrected
Source? English is a Germanic language that has borrowed much from Norman French and other languages. I seem to remember that the simplification of the grammar came about by the melding of English with the Norse languages spoken in the Danelaw once the country was united.
It does share a common root with Latin and Greek and Sanskrit etc in an original (though unknown) Proto-Indo-European language:
![]()
Indo-European languages - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Nothing to do with English, sorry."True English" is what they speak in Cornwall, which is similar to Welsh (lot's of L's in everything)....
I was taught that Latin had a large influence on what is now known as English, and you only have to look at some nouns & verbs to see that they are similar in many Latin based languages. "True English" is what they speak in Cornwall, which is similar to Welsh (lot's of L's in everything)....
and is responsible for some of the erroneous ‘rules’ like the ‘split infinitive’ and so on.
Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, French, and even "English" has its roots in Latin. Not sure about Greek. The biggest issue I can't get over with foreign languages is the fact that nouns are either male or female, that has never made any sense to me.
We used to have gendered nouns in English. I think we still do in some sense: boy, girl, etc.Italian, Spanish, Portuguese, French, and even "English" has its roots in Latin. Not sure about Greek. The biggest issue I can't get over with foreign languages is the fact that nouns are either male or female, that has never made any sense to me.
I was taught that Latin had a large influence on what is now known as English, and you only have to look at some nouns & verbs to see that they are similar in many Latin based languages. "True English" is what they speak in Cornwall, which is similar to Welsh (lot's of L's in everything)....