LCPete
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 9,785
- Edit My Images
- Yes
I'm a libertarian in that I want people to be free to make choices that don't cause actual harm to others, but I also recognise that these things are engineered to make people want to over-consume them, to the detriment of their health. Plus many could not afford to cover their healthcare costs as a result of over-consuming sugary sweet food and drink, and it's problematic that the rest of us should have to pay for overindulgence, at least partially induced by the food industry too.
Imo the food and drink industry are villains who care nothing about the health of the nation esepecially the nation's children. Millions are spent on lobbying politicians/ministers but it's an opaque world and numbers are almost impossible to come by.
![]()
Report uncovers opaque nature of food industry ministerial lobby
UK Research and Innovation funds project to better understand the impact of climate change on UK food pricesfoodfoundation.org.uk
A new report fromThe Food Foundation looking at food industry lobbying has concluded that lack of available information in the government's transparency registers makes it impossible to understand the extent of industry lobbying on specific policies.Lobbying, the process through which corporations, organisations and citizens can make their views known to policymakers, is an important part of the democratic process if done transparently.
However, The Food Foundation report reveals a system in the UK that is opaque and risks undermining democratic accountability, eroding public trust and disproportionately benefiting those with more financial or political resources or influence.
They use psychology ,too. It's rather long but here's the opener.
According to Ofcom figures, children in the UK watch on average 17 hours a week of TV, most of it on commercial TV stations. This represents considerable exposure to the advertisers' promotional messages. Adverts for food products can represent up to 40 per cent of the adverts children see on their commercial scheduled programming. Actually, in the UK it is probably as high as 50 per cent for most of the year.
These adverts appear to be mainly for snacks, breakfast cereals (predominantly the highly sugared variety), processed foods and drinks (mostly the soda or fruit-based high-sugar varieties). In addition to this, fast-food retailers also advertise extensively during programming scheduled for children. These foods and drinks seem to share a common characteristic: they are generally high in refined sugars and fats. The levels of fat, sugars and salt in some of these products are 'particularly alarming' (according to the UK Food Standards Agency – FSA).
![]()
Serving up trouble? Advertising food to children | BPS
As pressure grows on food advertisers, Jason C.G. Halford looks at the evidence.www.bps.org.uk
If they care so much, then why won't they ban smoking or alcoholic drinks.... ah, significant tax receipts. My bad.
They want to reduce overconsumption with eating, yet they continue to have a literal subsidised trough of fine dining, catering, bars etc where for every £10 an MP spends we the taxpayer contribute £7.60. That's hardly going to discourage them from overeating. Meanwhile over 3 million British citizens rely on foodbanks.
However, on the face of it addressing excessive sugar is certainly a good thing if there are apparently too many people becoming obese from it. I'm just not convinced about the "caring" motives, it feels a little like a virtue signal, but I could be wrong. Vapes are another thing that they continue to allow. Salt content in processed foods is still too high from what I've seen and we still have ultra processed foods. Argh, I'm just ranting. Ignore me. lol
Agree with you all its not a good situation when you look into it, especially a lot of prepacked meals are still high in salt and sugar, some of the better curry ready meals are quite nice but we try to limit them and I do make a curry at home quite often
Don’t smoke but do like a drink but figure that it’s my choice and don’t have more than 2 or 3 pints when we go out anyway
Its not good as you say the food companies have massive influence and always try to prevent any government regulation
