I think he was coming from a 'pro' tog point of view, and yes, if the rumour mill is true then video will cause big problems for the pro togs. I'm sure I read somewhere that FIFA had already put plans in place to ban video capable cameras.
A sports tog will better answer this, but I believe you are not meant to have video capability if you are covering a sporting event as an official tog. I think there was therefore some worry when the 1dMIV came out as it has video, what will happen in practise I'm not sure.
I ahve seen videos made with a mark3![]()
unless anyone has a source then it is just romour and gossip.. lots of people putting 2 and 2 together..
think one was posted on here not long ago, was a music video of some sort...interesting
thats the one I was thinking of
Lots of things are capable of doing lots of other things. Video is covered in the curerent licence agreement so i cant see it being a problem
As a prospective buyer of the mk4 I have just fired an email off to the CPS (Canon pro Service) as I am a member.. see what they have to say.. see if we can put the rumours to bed![]()

As a prospective buyer of the mk4 I have just fired an email off to the CPS (Canon pro Service) as I am a member.. see what they have to say.. see if we can put the rumours to bed![]()
Hi Mr.Greenwood,
What exists and has been running for some time is:
The F.A,(Football Association), The FIA (Federation Internationale de
IAutomobile), FIFA, the IOC (International Olympic Committee) and the
AELTC (All England Lawn Tennis Club) are asking ALL accredited
photographers to sign an pre-agreement stating they will not publish any
video content (regardless of whether they are shooting video or not.)
Violation of this will result in them or their agency losing their
accreditation
Obviously, t's & c's are subject to change so its always best to ask for
the latest information but in short, using DSLR's with video capability is
not an issue so long as you don't shoot video content on it.
I hope this answers your query.
Regards,
Frankie
A common sense approach there![]()

best get saving for a MKIV then![]()
Are you talking from a pro's point of view?
i.e - If I turned up at a football ground in the crowd, I couldn't video the game a tall?
Are you talking from a pro's point of view?
i.e - If I turned up at a football ground in the crowd, I couldn't video the game a tall?
So realistically if you have a p&s you would be ok. If you have a D90/other video camera and/or big lens they may chuck you out.
So realistically if you have a p&s you would be ok. If you have a D90/other video camera and/or big lens they may chuck you out.
I'm not into football, but what is it to go and see Man united? £50? and you can't even take a photo to show you were there!
Seems crazy to me. Although I went to a music festival a year or so ago, they are now banning all SLR's because they think people might be making money out of it.
That was one of the main reasons I went, to take photo's, for my own pleasure and enjoyment. It is soon going to be impossible to own and use and SLR anywhere.
:bang:
I was chatting to a freelance car tog and he used a 5Dmk2 because of the Video on DSLR option. He could shoot additional footage for the websites thus maximise his income stream from a single shoot.
KIPAX : Just noticed you're in Accrington, I used to live there!
Was talking to my Mom about this, along with the other threads relating to getting stopped for taking photos.
When I look back to when I was really into film photography, 91-96 ish. I probably couldn't do most of that any more :
Slr @
Wimbledon
Blackburn rovers football games
School football game
Swimming competition
Rovers_Andy - You say that people associate slr's with good pictures, this is true. But it's the reason we buy them!