Trumping

Ooh, get you. :LOL:
LOL it was a subtle dig at the mercuns posting on here. Number of passports owned though is increasing - 38% now own passports, been a huge rise recently. Travel really does broaden the mind (75% of uk citizens have passports)
 
It used to be the disaffected youth that supported controversial political figures in order to upset the applecart and "stick it to the man".

How times have changed. :D
 
Not saying they are perfect by any means, but do you actually believe that statement?

Without their intervention, or threat thereof, we would be living in an even less stable world atm.

100%. How about prosecuting an illegal war against Iraq for example.
 
Iraq was a poor start and looking back its laughable that we intervened, Hussein might have been a dictator but can anyone say that the current situation there is preferable?

Certainly not the Iraqis themselves.
The majority of them didn't want him gone in the first place.


I suggest you listen to him first hand because a lot of mainstream media (owned by supporters of other candidates) are dead against him and will misquote him to make him look evil

I don't believe he's evil.
I believe he's a tw@t....there's a big difference. :D
 
100%. How about prosecuting an illegal war against Iraq for example.

ONE example (if the term `illegal` is correct) & even then getting rid of SH wasn't a bad thing.

Without the threat of force to dissuade, we & other countries would be under greater threats from those that wish to destroy us.
 
Re: let's not forget that without them we would not be living in a free u.k .
Ok this makes me think you're american as I heard this a lot when travelling this year, with recent conflicts and harking back to WW2. Yes the US helped us out, but at a cost which we only finished paying for in 2006.

not forgetting Hitler abandoned Overlord before the Americans became fully involved. Let's not forget that if we had not survived the Blitz there would have been nowhere to launch D-Day from.

Contrary to 'Hollywood' fact the US did not get hold of Enigma.

and much of the expertise in nuclear fission and jet/rocket propulsion was European.

Obama was full of promises, delivered very little. His anti-British sentiments irked me (especially during the Gulf Deepwater Horizon incident in 2010) and nothing make me think that the special relationship can continue whoever is the next occupant of the White House (which has still got the bullet holes from the 1812-1814 war IIRC).

Trump is hot air, but the Americans will buy into it as they bought into Obama 8 years ago. Frankly, anyone who wants to get into politics need their heads examined.
 
& even then getting rid of SH wasn't a bad thing.

whats left behind is better somehow? don't get me wrong I think he needed to go, however there was a degree of poor planning over what came next
 
.......... don't get me wrong I think he needed to go, however there was a degree of poor planning over what came next

Absolutely. (y)

In theory it's better to rid all countries of despots & dictatorships, BUT, as often happens, the vacuum that remains creates even more problems, not just the outside world, but the locals too.
 
Absolutely. (y)

In theory it's better to rid all countries of despots & dictatorships, BUT, as often happens, the vacuum that remains creates even more problems, not just the outside world, but the locals too.


I agree. I certainly wouldn't want to see a return to 80's style RealPolitik where we'd get into bed with anyone who could hold a country together regardless of how nasty they were or how the did it.... but equally we've left some pretty big ungoverned (and possibly ungovernable) spaces in the Middle East that are causing all sorts of problems and will only get worse
 
Try thinking outside of the box. We live in European ruled by socialists
Which Europe are you living in? France has an openly socialist leading party, Italy has a centre left leading party. The UK and Germany are both lead by centre right parties. The over-whelming bias in Europe is capitalist neo-liberalism.

But here's a question, what's wrong with socialism? - the NHS is socialist organisation. Your best pal Trump is vehemently opposed to principals behind the NHS and a healthcare service free at the point of need. Are you against the NHS? Do you want healthcare to be reserved only for those that can afford to pay for it?

Trump is a twunt, his politics are those of "I'm alright, so **** you".
 
not forgetting Hitler abandoned Overlord before the Americans became fully involved. Let's not forget that if we had not survived the Blitz there would have been nowhere to launch D-Day from.

Ummm.. Operation Overlord was the D-Day landings, you're thinking of Unternehmen Seelöwe which was the proposed invasion of the UK for 1940.
 
ONE example (if the term `illegal` is correct) & even then getting rid of SH wasn't a bad thing.

Without the threat of force to dissuade, we & other countries would be under greater threats from those that wish to destroy us.

It was a bad thing. He posed no threat to us. The USA destroyed that country and divided it, breeding the the discontent that enabled Al Qaeda and then IS to flourish.
 
Which Europe are you living in? France has an openly socialist leading party, Italy has a centre left leading party. The UK and Germany are both lead by centre right parties. The over-whelming bias in Europe is capitalist neo-liberalism.

But here's a question, what's wrong with socialism? - the NHS is socialist organisation. Your best pal Trump is vehemently opposed to principals behind the NHS and a healthcare service free at the point of need. Are you against the NHS? Do you want healthcare to be reserved only for those that can afford to pay for it?

Trump is a twunt, his politics are those of "I'm alright, so **** you".

This is a man who described a loan of $1million from his family as a small loan
 
Which Europe are you living in? France has an openly socialist leading party, Italy has a centre left leading party. The UK and Germany are both lead by centre right parties. The over-whelming bias in Europe is capitalist neo-liberalism.

But here's a question, what's wrong with socialism? - the NHS is socialist organisation. Your best pal Trump is vehemently opposed to principals behind the NHS and a healthcare service free at the point of need. Are you against the NHS? Do you want healthcare to be reserved only for those that can afford to pay for it?

Trump is a twunt, his politics are those of "I'm alright, so **** you".

NHS is not free. We pay a lot of taxes (including major part of NI) that funds NHS. GP level services are very poor from my experience, and some hospitals were labelled by the mainstream media as dangerous. Just imagine, they won't give you a blood test because you don't look desperately sick. Prevention of disease is clearly not in the guidebooks.

Furthermore, most conservative parties in europe are already pretty leftwing compared to their roots. It is like 2 legs of the same sick body walking at a different pace.

PC neo-liberlalism appears to be a real cancer that will destroy the western way of life.
 
Ummm.. Operation Overlord was the D-Day landings, you're thinking of Unternehmen Seelöwe which was the proposed invasion of the UK for 1940.
Oh you're just showing off now...i got Sealion and Overlord mixed up... Can't go wrong with Barbarossa though...
It was a bad thing. He posed no threat to us. The USA destroyed that country and divided it, breeding the the discontent that enabled Al Qaeda and then IS to flourish.
 
This is a man who described a loan of $1million from his family as a small loan

I'm sorry you have finally realised that we are practically living like slaves. $1M is not a lot for any reasonable business, and we are not under the leadership of Trump but the darling Obama and his mate Cameron, both overseen by the bankers
 
NHS is not free. We pay a lot of taxes (including major part of NI) that funds NHS. GP level services are very poor from my experience, and some hospitals were labelled by the mainstream media as dangerous. Just imagine, they won't give you a blood test because you don't look desperately sick. Prevention of disease is clearly not in the guidebooks.
I don't think you get Socialism, yes stuff is paid for through taxation - from each according to his means, to each according to his needs.. that's how it works.

We should be spending more on health care to improve prevention, but you know how the pips squeak when we the conversation drifts towards increasing taxation revenue...

(if you want a general check-up blood test, book a "well man" session at your GP)
 
Texas response: Do we think this is normal?
Groups of young men walking around with Tactical rifles: http://www.npr.org/sections/itsallp...6707/open-carry-gun-laws-spark-texas-backlash
Carrying loaded rifles into restaurants: http://www.npr.org/2014/06/06/319552462/open-carry-activists-bear-arms-in-the-streets-and-chipotle

I would be far more concerned about the number of nukes in possession of so many countries, even the likes of NK or Pakistan (i.e. on the verge or Al-qaeda/Taliban revolution).

What is normal by the way? Is it what you are used to or what MSNBC or BBC say? Do you think fractional reserve banking normal? Do you think abortion (killing of babies) is normal?
 
NHS is not free. We pay a lot of taxes (including major part of NI) that funds NHS. GP level services are very poor from my experience, and some hospitals were labelled by the mainstream media as dangerous. Just imagine, they won't give you a blood test because you don't look desperately sick. Prevention of disease is clearly not in the guidebooks.

Furthermore, most conservative parties in europe are already pretty leftwing compared to their roots. It is like 2 legs of the same sick body walking at a different pace.

PC neo-liberlalism appears to be a real cancer that will destroy the western way of life.

It is free at the point of use though, which has always been the point of the NHS. Of course, it's also underfunded and too much of it's money goes into management and not nurses / doctors. But then, it's much easier to privatise something if you under-fund it to the point that it doesn't perform as it should.
 
I'm sorry you have finally realised that we are practically living like slaves. $1M is not a lot for any reasonable business, and we are not under the leadership of Trump but the darling Obama and his mate Cameron, both overseen by the bankers
You make no sense whatsoever. Can I just check, you are a supporter of the Syrup Of Doom? But you don't want to be lead by a supporter of the banks and big finance, you object that in this country we need permissions to protest, you think Trump will be the peacemaker to replace the current warmongers and will be the scourge of the TTIP.

I'm not sure everyone's on the same page...
 
I don't think you get Socialism, yes stuff is paid for through taxation - from each according to his means, to each according to his needs.. that's how it works.

We should be spending more on health care to improve prevention, but you know how the pips squeak when we the conversation drifts towards increasing taxation revenue...

(if you want a general check-up blood test, book a "well man" session at your GP)

Wouldn't disease prevention reduce the cost of treatment down the line? Cancer is particularly expensive, so if detected very would cost just a fraction let alone the benefits for the patients
 
Do you think abortion (killing of babies) is normal?

Abortion is not "the killing of babies".
Do you write for the Daily Mail by any chance?
Do yourself a favour. Turn off the computer/phone, and go out and get a coffee.
Or a sandwich.
Or a blow job.
Take your wallet. :D
 
You make no sense whatsoever. Can I just check, you are a supporter of the Syrup Of Doom? But you don't want to be lead by a supporter of the banks and big finance, you object that in this country we need permissions to protest, you think Trump will be the peacemaker to replace the current warmongers and will be the scourge of the TTIP.

I'm not sure everyone's on the same page...

I belong to the Order of the Fish Bone Soup :). Majority of America appears to agree with me (i.e. Trump clearly leads the polls despite all blackmail and direct death threats).

I suggest you read you read up on the creation of the FED in 1913 with the help of misinformed pres Wilson and the economic crisis in the 1930's that followed. There is a lot to learn from the history.
 
Abortion is not "the killing of babies".
Do you write for the Daily Mail by any chance?
Do yourself a favour. Turn off the computer/phone, and go out and get a coffee.
Or a sandwich.
Or a blow job.
Take your wallet. :D

The holy Catholic Church completely disagrees with you there http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/c...ith_doc_19741118_declaration-abortion_en.html

Define abortion if it is not killing. Planned termination of pre-natal life. = Termination of life = killing.
 
so glad i'm at the wrong end of my lifetime ,makes me wonder how much the options on here are swayed by the politically correct schooling of the late 70's,80s and 90s when all teaching jobs were advertised and offered in the telegraph i think . how easily the lessons of a long hard six year war to establish a free country are forgotten . personally as i said actually listening to the man (trump) rather than just reading a reporters own views on what he thinks he said ,i find he talks sense america can not stand idly by while its invaded by hordes from mexico who only want to get there for economic reasons ,any more than can europe stand by and watch itself being taken over by millions of immigrants who by the way are still arriving daily .merkel made one hell of a mistake when she opened the floodgates ,one that i think this year is going to rise up and bite her on the bum badly
 
The holy Catholic Church completely disagrees with you there http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/c...ith_doc_19741118_declaration-abortion_en.html

Define abortion if it is not killing. Planned termination of pre-natal life. = Termination of life = killing.

I couldn't give a rats about catholicism, or any opinion it has regarding any subject.
Abortion is bringing about the end of a pregnancy so that it does not result in the birth of a child.
The time limit for abortion in the UK is 24 weeks.
It should be much much lower for all but the most exeptional circumstances.
It should never be banned.
 
been listening to a few speeches by Donald trump over the last few days ,and I am starting to like what he's saying a lot of it is pure patriotism and common sense ,any one else feel the same I even think he might make the White House yet
Times they are a changin' ;)
*they* said that a certain politician would *never* become leader of the labour party, *they* were wrong.


merkel made one hell of a mistake when she opened the floodgates ,one that i think this year is going to rise up and bite her on the bum badly
Lets hope so Eh? ;)

Do yourself a favour. Turn off the computer/phone, and go out and get a coffee.
Or a sandwich.
Or a blow job.
Take your wallet. :D
Thats the best advice I've seen written on any TP thread
I'm outta here *click* :D
 
Wouldn't disease prevention reduce the cost of treatment down the line? Cancer is particularly expensive, so if detected very would cost just a fraction let alone the benefits for the patients

how do you propose detecting it early? other than CT scanning everyone regularly head to toe? Which in itself would be massively expensive.
 
how do you propose detecting it early? other than CT scanning everyone regularly head to toe? Which in itself would be massively expensive.

lots of ways... OK many of them may require lots of further R&D but this should be made a top research priority. Detection of certain biomarkers in blood and tissue samples is one of them.

And lets not forget about simple ones like regular colonoscopy and ultrasound testing. Both are fairly harmless if a little time involving. MRI once every 5 or 10 years for people known to be at risk could be easily justified.
 
lots of ways... OK many of them may require lots of further R&D but this should be made a top research priority. Detection of certain biomarkers in blood and tissue samples is one of them.

And lets not forget about simple ones like regular colonoscopy and ultrasound testing. Both are fairly harmless if a little time involving. MRI once every 5 or 10 years for people known to be at risk could be easily justified.
all of which would increase NHS spending.
 
all of which would increase NHS spending.

No. Colonoscopy only costs 20 min time of a doctor and a pair of gloves, and a bit of vaseline. It may save over £100k in cancer treatment costs alone. This is before you consider loss of productivity and benefit payments. 1 early detection in 1000 patient sample group would be cost effective.

It is similar to tobacco taxation gains vs smoking-related disease reduction. We've seen enough evidence to officially encourage giving up smoking nationwide
 
I'm loving how suddenly all cancers can be detected with an ultrasound, or a little more worryingly, a colonoscopy :D
 
It is similar to tobacco taxation gains vs smoking-related disease reduction. We've seen enough evidence to officially encourage giving up smoking nationwide
Not necessarily. Taxation on tobacco products raises about £13 billion per year, but dealing with smoking related illnesses only costs the NHS about £2 billion per year. Smokers subsidise the NHS for the rest of us.
 
No. Colonoscopy only costs 20 min time of a doctor and a pair of gloves, and a bit of vaseline. It may save over £100k in cancer treatment costs alone. This is before you consider loss of productivity and benefit payments. 1 early detection in 1000 patient sample group would be cost effective.
seriously, have you tried getting a doctors appointment recently? ours has a 2 week wait.

i dont think you've really thought this through.
 
seriously, have you tried getting a doctors appointment recently? ours has a 2 week wait.
Same here Neil, its bloody crazy Eh? :(
I guess they are betting, you are either better in those two weeks, or dead!
 
I would be far more concerned about the number of nukes in possession of so many countries, even the likes of NK or Pakistan (i.e. on the verge or Al-qaeda/Taliban revolution).

What is normal by the way? Is it what you are used to or what MSNBC or BBC say? Do you think fractional reserve banking normal? Do you think abortion (killing of babies) is normal?

Abortion isn't the killing of babies. That's crazy talk. Have you been at your dad's bourbon son?
 
Abortion isn't the killing of babies. That's crazy talk. Have you been at your dad's bourbon son?

Nope my guess he's american. He's ticking a lot of boxes from the outspoken trump supporters I met recently

I belong to the Order of the Fish Bone Soup :). Majority of America appears to agree with me (i.e. Trump clearly leads the polls despite all blackmail and direct death threats).
Sadly quite a few believe his trollop, based on my recent travels and discussions, but then I met others who believed the US haven't had a decent president since Reagan. Mind you, wasn't there a stat about the high percentage of americans who believe the moon landings were faked.

So you can fool some of the people all of the time...
 
Last edited:
Back
Top