- Messages
- 43,206
- Name
- Alan
- Edit My Images
- No
If that's really true, and it might be to some extent, we really are f***ed.
I think so, to an extent. The next week or two may provide a clearer picture. I fully expect U turns and folds.
If that's really true, and it might be to some extent, we really are f***ed.
A bit like the barking mad professor John Ashton on Question Time - Fiona Bruce should have expelled him TBH
Downtown Seoul and downtown Hackney are very different culturally, wouldn't you say?
I didn't see that. Got time for a short sharp update for me?
Well there's hundreds of them apparently.Depends exactly who the advisers are.
Why is it pointless comparing trends to say France, Germany or Spain?This!
We are not comparing Like with Like across the world or even Europe so comparisons with other Countries is pointless IMO.
,,,,,,,,,,,,,and the relevance/point of this post?
Do you think the Government should go against it's advisers?
The Chief Secretary to the Treasury was appearing on Thursday night’s BBC Question Time from West Bromwich. He was joined on the panel by Labour MP Louise Haigh, Pete Wishart from the SNP, the managing director of Iceland Foods, Richard Walker and Professor John Ashton. Professor Ashton, a former director of public health in the north west, launched an astonishing attack on the Prime Minister, saying that he had lost control of the crisis.
He described the Government’s approach as “paternalistic” and “old fashioned” and of being complacent
The Professor, who has lectured on public health at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, was incredulous that the Government allowed the Champion’s League football game between Liverpool and Atletico Madrid to go ahead on Wednesday night.
He pointed out that Madrid was in the midst of a serious outbreak and that 3,0000 of their fans attended the match, potentially bringing the virus with them.
The Professor also criticised the decision to not trace all those people who had travelled to Italy.
However, Mr Barclay countered that the Prime Minister’s strategy was based on the best scientific advice available.
The MP for North East Cambridgeshire said: “There’s an agreed position on the science and it is the science, it is the view of our top scientists across all four countries of the UK that is driving the position.
“And therefore respectfully to John, he is at odds with the leading scientists of the UK.”
Mr Barclay called for unity and said that coronavirus epidemic should not be politicised
He explained: “We are working across the UK, this is above politics.
“This is something that we need to come together. We all have a concern for our constituents, but I come back to this point.
“It’s what expert advice says, it’s what the facts say and it’s what the science says that is absolutely crucial here.”
Viewers appeared to side with the Tory minister, as they took to twitter to criticise Professor Ashton for fear mongering and trying to score cheap political points
One wrote: “Ashton is a Labour member and campaigner. Shame QT failed to mention that.
“Now he’s trying to make a political point out of the pandemic.”
Another commented: “Your appearance on BBCQT was extremely unprofessional and irresponsible[/QUOTE}
How do we know they aren't?
Why is it pointless comparing trends to say France, Germany or Spain?
Why is it pointless comparing trends to say France, Germany or Spain?
Time will tell who was right.Here is a brief summary of the exchange on QT:
Does the virus recognise those differences?Completely different demographics/cultures and geography.
Time will tell who was right.
I don't know, I'm not an expert, and neither are youAnd are the stats useful? South Korea have tested far more people so appear to have a lower mortality rate there.
Does the virus recognise those differences?
I think we're a bit past party politics at this point, or ought to be.Time will tell but I think the arguments and recriminations will go on until the next election and then whoever is in No.10 may one day regret winning.
The experts and the government are following what they "believe" to be the best course of action.Well it won't!
We have followed a 'route' what would have happened following a different route is just pure speculation!
From human to human is the same regardless if you're in France, Germany, Spain etc.The way it spreads does.
Does the virus recognise those differences?
I think we're a bit past party politics at this point, or ought to be.
I'm not saying we should be listening to Twitter.When Politicians from all sides are stating that the Government is following the best medical advice they have then I think we can be fairly satisifed they are - certainly alot more satisfied that taking 'the truth' from t***ter?
Well Scotland is f***ed then.I don't know what I'm talking about so don't shoot me.... but maybe... and for speculation only...
I'd imagine that age demographics and health matter and susceptibility to serious infection could I suppose be affected not just by age and known health conditions such as diabetes or heart conditions but also by wealth, living conditions, nutrition and diet and by social practices and factors and these could vary from country to country or maybe even region to region.
I used to date a really good economist, so good in fact that people used to fly her around the world to do her thing, and the detail she went into was incredible and I do hope that the experts the government are taking advice from go into that sort of level of research and preparation before giving their advice.
So are the epi curves:Downtown Seoul and downtown Hackney are very different culturally, wouldn't you say?
If we follow a different route to others, then maybe time will tell.Well it won't!
We have followed a 'route' what would have happened following a different route is just pure speculation!
Well Scotland is f***ed then.
We're the poor man of Europe, or so they keep telling us.
Our old people will be fine, apparently they are the loneliest in Europe as their families largely ignore them, except perhaps in Wales.
On a more serious note, if that finding is true we will hopefully have a lower mortality rate.
That could all be true, and I don't argue against that. I know its not simple.I'm sure Scotland looks good compared to the Redcar / Middlesbrough area where I live
I did read on the Beeb somewhere that one of the reasons Italy has had a relatively high death rate is that they have more susceptible older people.
If that's true it could count against the idea of looking at a league table and doing whatever countries with the fewest deaths is doing as it may not be as simple as that. For all I know the country with the fewest deaths could be hiding/missing some figures or they may just have a younger and less susceptible demographic.
That could all be true, and I don't argue against that. I know its not simple.
I also know its unprecedented, and some countries will ha Dale it better than others.
I just home we're one of them, but I'm not convinced.
That is just my opinion, the same as any one elses opinion is purely that, their opinion.
Even the experts will be sitting in meetings saying...."in my opinion"....they're opinion will be a lot more professionally based than any of hours, but the experts don't always get it right.
We see our Dad twice a week, minimum and speak to him virtually every day. My conscience is pretty much ok these days. Learnt the hard way regarding my Mum.We can all do our bit to remedy that Matt.
For all I know the country with the fewest deaths could be hiding/missing some figures or they may just have a younger and less susceptible demographic.

My mother in law is 80.We see our Dad twice a week, minimum and speak to him virtually every day. My conscience is pretty much ok these days. Learnt the hard way regarding my Mum.
Does the virus recognise those differences?
Or you could argue they need to keep testing so they can identify who genuinely has the virus, and can be treated accordingly.You could draw from those stats that testing is pretty much pointles as Italy is in a far worse death rate than the UK, figures mean nothing or can mean something, depends on how you interpret them.
As sad as her demise would be, she wants to live her life the way she wants to live it and not be frightened by a possible infection, I applaud her attitude, who knows she might avoid this and live to be a 100.My mother in law is 80.
She's a social animal and doesn't stay in.
She also has respiratory issues. The doctors, the hospital and even the chemists have all said she should take it easy and stay in more for a bit, but she won't listen.
I genuinely fear she will become a coronavirus victim...
That is obvious.Yes. Old and unhealthy population will fare worse than a younger healthier one.
Tests need to be carried out on those that present with symptoms, as opposed to those that just demand a test, we have already witnessed greed in the UK and it's not a pretty sight.Or you could argue they need to keep testing so they can identify who genuinely has the virus, and can be treated accordingly.
Our level of testing will increase significantly I think when the hospitalisations and fatalities increase dramatically.