Pookeyhead
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 11,746
- Name
- David
- Edit My Images
- No
OK.. here goes.
Please remember, comments are merely based on my preferences as I saw the image in my mind when I took it, although anything successful (IMO) that wasn't like I saw it, will also be recognised.
Rhodese:
Fabulous attention to detail in recreating 120 FP4. The only thing that shatters the illusion is the low resolution of the RAW as it was taken on a Canon 350D. The tonality and grain structure really is redolent of FP4 in Rodinal. The retouching is superb and all traces of my filthy sensor have been dealt with (yes I did clean it
... Pollen was a real problem that year). The grey layer dodge and burn is subtle, and the re framing to the square format is nicely done. I'm not convinced by flocking the bird(s) as they all look precisely the same. There's no attempt at doimg anything dramatic, and the overall effect is believable. There is a distinct lack of blacks though, and a well exposed and printed piece of FP4 would have far more luscious blacks than that. May be a monitor calibration issue. Overall though, this is really well done.
TheDrift-:
The added sky itself adds a great deal of drama, and the retouching adds the whole lost temple, Lara Croft, Indiana Jones thing quite well. What lets this down for me is the extreme detail extraction which not only makes it look like a piece of graphic art (In itself, not necessarily a bad thing), but the same treatment isn't apparent in the sky, which makes the whole ensemble weaker IMO. The sky is added quite skilfully with only minimal artefacts and give away signs.
Farmerjim:
I really like this... although I shouldn't. It really isn't my thing at all
The only thing I can find fault with technically though, the hardness of the edge to the area that the print has "curled" from. It would be softer in reality. There really is something captured very well here... the use of the Dragon Rapide speaks loudly of a time when British Colonialism in the region was at it's peak. You can almost see the gentlemen in white linen and pith hats
It's got the elegance we associate with the time and point in history. Jolly good show old chap!
Dr-O:
I love the processing of the underlying image... it's got the colours and tones redolent of the light you see prior to a tropical storm captured beautifully. I'm sorry though... that rain ruins it for me. It doesn't look like rain. If it was raining that heavy, you should have faded everything back, as visibility would have been severely reduced due to aerial perspective. I can't look at the hi-res version as I get a "bad panda" message from Flickr when I try (Flickr is down at the moment), so can't comment on the finer points of the work. If that rain wasn't there..........
GardenersHelper:
A very detailed, and precise workflow. I suspect much of that workflow is giving very small incremental gains however, which do not hide the fact that it's a VERY tight crop from a 6MP RAW and quality has suffered. You've done wonders with what is a flawed RAW file due to what is now almost ancient technology
Skillfully executed by someone who clearly knows what they're doing, and has a good command of Photoshop. Not sure you've convinced anyone the sky was blue though 
Solo man:
Clean, unpretentious and simple. Confusing workflow though: Why increase highlights? It has removed sky detail and made it fairly white and featurless. Treatment of the foliage is nicely done.
OK.... I'm really agonising over two images here. Rhodese has done a superlative job, but Farmerjim, despite being the usual digital Smörgåsbord has really captured something of the pre-war colonial postcard vibe. I honestly can not choose between them... LOL But I have to.... and I'm giving it to Farmerjim. It's a break from tradition for me, but despite Rhodese's work being technically more accomplished, I FELT something when I looked at Jim's... and all opinions about processing aside... that is what a great image does... makes you feel.. takes you somewhere.
Over to you Jim
Here's what I did... sorry... but it was 8 years ago, so I have no idea what I did
I know however, that the sky was FAR more foreboding than the RAW shows, despite my 1/3rd stop under-exposure. Frmo appearance, I've probably dodged and burned the sky on a soft light blended grey layer, and mixed a green filtered mono layer with luminance.
Please remember, comments are merely based on my preferences as I saw the image in my mind when I took it, although anything successful (IMO) that wasn't like I saw it, will also be recognised.
Rhodese:
Fabulous attention to detail in recreating 120 FP4. The only thing that shatters the illusion is the low resolution of the RAW as it was taken on a Canon 350D. The tonality and grain structure really is redolent of FP4 in Rodinal. The retouching is superb and all traces of my filthy sensor have been dealt with (yes I did clean it
TheDrift-:
The added sky itself adds a great deal of drama, and the retouching adds the whole lost temple, Lara Croft, Indiana Jones thing quite well. What lets this down for me is the extreme detail extraction which not only makes it look like a piece of graphic art (In itself, not necessarily a bad thing), but the same treatment isn't apparent in the sky, which makes the whole ensemble weaker IMO. The sky is added quite skilfully with only minimal artefacts and give away signs.
Farmerjim:
I really like this... although I shouldn't. It really isn't my thing at all
Dr-O:
I love the processing of the underlying image... it's got the colours and tones redolent of the light you see prior to a tropical storm captured beautifully. I'm sorry though... that rain ruins it for me. It doesn't look like rain. If it was raining that heavy, you should have faded everything back, as visibility would have been severely reduced due to aerial perspective. I can't look at the hi-res version as I get a "bad panda" message from Flickr when I try (Flickr is down at the moment), so can't comment on the finer points of the work. If that rain wasn't there..........
GardenersHelper:
A very detailed, and precise workflow. I suspect much of that workflow is giving very small incremental gains however, which do not hide the fact that it's a VERY tight crop from a 6MP RAW and quality has suffered. You've done wonders with what is a flawed RAW file due to what is now almost ancient technology
Solo man:
Clean, unpretentious and simple. Confusing workflow though: Why increase highlights? It has removed sky detail and made it fairly white and featurless. Treatment of the foliage is nicely done.
OK.... I'm really agonising over two images here. Rhodese has done a superlative job, but Farmerjim, despite being the usual digital Smörgåsbord has really captured something of the pre-war colonial postcard vibe. I honestly can not choose between them... LOL But I have to.... and I'm giving it to Farmerjim. It's a break from tradition for me, but despite Rhodese's work being technically more accomplished, I FELT something when I looked at Jim's... and all opinions about processing aside... that is what a great image does... makes you feel.. takes you somewhere.
Over to you Jim
Here's what I did... sorry... but it was 8 years ago, so I have no idea what I did
Last edited:
. Liked the vibe from it and Rhodese's old school image was damn fine too. Good round from all really
- I even forgot my original idea such was the focus
most apt!














I'll bet.