rookies
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 8,064
- Name
- Andrew
- Edit My Images
- No
The23rdman said:The eagle has landed.![]()
He yours refurb or? If refurb how long it took to get?
The23rdman said:The eagle has landed.![]()
Good stuff Dean. Keep us informed.
He yours refurb or? If refurb how long it took to get?
I got mine to be a more portable option to my dslr, I am keeping my dslr aswell, this will be used for non photocentric trips. Dslr will come out for purpose photo trips. Or that's the plan. Whether that will change after using the X10 a lot I don't know.
I have been happy with the IQ from the one I borrowed a few times. All the images I have seen here and Flickr make me think my dslr will be gaining dust.[/QUOTE]
As very many do.
Well, after a couple of weeks lurking here and reading about half the pages on this very long thread, I took the plunge on Monday and ordered a refurb off the Fuji website. £274.98 with the voucher, including postage. Horrifying to think they were around the £600 mark only 10 months ago)
...
Anyway, a couple of 'questions for the panel', if I may:
- How can I tell the firmware number and if it has had the sensor upgrade ? (I assume it has but it'd be nice to check)
- I've read elsewhere (dpreview etc) that it's preferable to do Raw processing on-camera as both Lightroom/PS and Fiji's own PC software don't handle it too well (and degrade the image in some way ?). But on this thread I gather that plenty of people are happily using LR for Raw processing. Comments please?
Hold down disp/back button when turning on to check firmware.
Not sure about the sensor thing.
They were just shy of £500, not £600 - but your point is valid!
You can't tell the sensor version from the software version. As far as I know, there is no way to tell other than ringing Fuji with a serial number. However, if you check a few pages back there was a post indicating that cameras with the quoted serial number prefixes had the new sensor fitted at the factory.
More than a few pages back we didn't agree with the dpreview findings as they don't seem to match what we are finding.
For example, the image quality comparometer for ISO 100 shows noise levels spookily similar to their ISO 400 sample. Real X10's don't do that. Somebody mucked it up and until dpreview publish the EXIF data for their tests there is no way to check.
It is really important to do your own tests - and report back here!
Thanks folks. It is the latest firmware, but the serial begins 14G...
I think I'll drop an email to Fuji to ask about the sensor![]()
Wheres the best place to get one of these? Digrev have them at 279 same price as the refurb store, or from Amazon 330 ish.
Have a D90 but just does not get use it deserves!
... in due course I had the sensor change which did take a 'long' three weeks as they were inundated at that point.
I also had a problem with the rear thumb grip becoming loose and sent it off, under warranty, & had it back within the week.
Some people have got so used to not having a viewfinder they forget howeasy it is, and that they haves been used for decades. Some people take a while to get accustomed to one again.
Some how they expect to see all the on screen information.
The X10 just shows you the view with nothing else to distract you, Just as it was right up to the 1970's even on advanced cameras.
That is why people are getting such natural shots again.....they are not distracted....
Use some eco stick (or similar contact adhesive).
That should do the trick!
The optical viewfinder, for all its weakness and lack of information, is one of the great joys of the X10.
Oh yes I reckon a Hilti Gun would solve the case of the loose rear thumb grip :nuts:
Thanks folks. It is the latest firmware, but the serial begins 14G...
I think I'll drop an email to Fuji to ask about the sensor![]()
Unfortunately we are unable to tell which X10's have the updated senors and which do not. Not all the X10's are suffering from the 'white orbs'. If your camera experiences this fault please let us know ASAP and we will arrange a sensor replacement.
So Fuji replied very promptly this morning:
I don't know whether to laugh or cry. :bang:
So Fuji replied very promptly this morning:
I don't know whether to laugh or cry. :bang:



So Fuji replied very promptly this morning:
I don't know whether to laugh or cry. :bang:
They said the same to me and I don't see a problem. Use it, if it orbs send it in.
Not a problem for me. But any half-competent service/repair operation ought to keep a record of what units they've worked on, I'd have thought!
:shrug:
Not a problem for me. But any half-competent service/repair operation ought to keep a record of what units they've worked on, I'd have thought!
:shrug:
They may not know which few early sensors are without orbs, so they can not go by serial numbers.
It seems sensors in a single batch can either have orbs or not. So the batch records would be no help.
Later sensors on cameras starting 22 or 23 seem to all be ok. (this is what people report but is not necessarily a fact.)
Yours is an earlier one so a question mark hangs over it.
A very simple test always works to find the answer.![]()
I advised one of my carers to get one, she brought it in yesterday, I had a try and was quite impressed except for the OVF, I tried it and it looked to me like it was misaligned as when you zoomed in and centred an object in the OVF it would be off centre in the resulting image.
Is this the parallax error I've read about or is it misalignment and it needs to go back to be replaced?
I don't want her to leave it if it is a problem that needs rectifying.
Distant objects should be aligned (roughly) with what you see and what you take.
Close objects will get parallax. Should be OK, just allow a healthy margin around the edges or use the screen.
Big step for me not taking my D90 and i took the X10. Very impressive camera.
I love the filters and Panoramic!!
![]()