- Messages
- 3,097
- Edit My Images
- No
This one here , like the majority theres a little play in it but at that price you cant complain.



Autofocus aside, the image quality from the X-Pro 1 is excellent considering its stature.
I recently blogged about it and some sunrises I'd been shooting. In terms of image quality, it compared well against my D700.
http://www.digitalrelish.net/1329/liverpool-sunrises-with-the-fuji-x-pro-1/
These are great Pix of Liverpool. Just a question. Are they JPEG or RAW. I read somewhere that lightroom has trouble with RAW from this camera or is that now an out of date comment?
Thank you for the link. I take it, it does not work with Nikon G lenses?
Just off subject for abit.
Why is the 60mm a 2.4, if it was a 1.4 I would probably get another x-pro1.
I really enjoyed the IQ I got from the 35mm but just found it to wide.
My fav all time lens seems to be 85mm 1.4's![]()
do they do refurb lenses on their own? I only found the link to the refurb cameras.
do they do refurb lenses on their own? I only found the link to the refurb cameras.
gary43 said:I fancy a Fuji as a backup to my Canon gear and the odd few% discount might just make something affordable.
Gary



About to make the step of selling all my Canon gear to buy the X-E1. With three small children I am after something smaller and more 'go to' and wife friendly. Anyone care to advice me otherwise? I was looking at coupling the body with the XF35mm f/1.4 R. Many Thanks ~
The only thing ive noticed so far is ISO doesnt really seem to affect it all that much, i went from 200 up to max and didnt see a lot of exposure change. Hopefully thats just a characteristic of the adpater and not a broken camera!
17-55, 60mm 2.4 or wait for the 56mm 1.4? Portrait lens dilemma
wouldn't DOF be a little thin on the 56/1.4 for a portrait or do you think the bokeh will be nicer than the 60mm?