Thanks for the heads up, but it wouldn't go down to well with the other half if I spent anymore on camera gear this month, I went to Grays of Westminster on Tuesday to pick up 2 Beenie hats, ended up buying a 18-140 Z lens for my Z50.Loads of reduced Nikon and Sony stuff in John Lewis Solihull (stock from Birmingham) if people are interested.
I think TP are missing a trick here.OK...fess up...who ordered the brand spanking new Fuji X-T4 in my name which was delivered yesterday?
Enough is enough, said no one ever.....I'll confess.... I have become an addict!!!
Enough is enough!!
How is yourR3 and what do you shoot?Having had my Canon R3 for four months I now am itching to get some of that RF glass but . . . . I was hoping to win the Euro Millions. Oh, well the RF 15-35mm f2.8L, RF 24-70mm f2.8 L and RF 70-200mm f2.8 L will have to wait for a few more years![]()
A couple of guys at our camera club have the R3How is yourR3 and what do you shoot?
To be honest I'm blown away especially coming from a 1D MK IV (which I love) and although I'm not a pro photographer I predominately shoot sport and a bit of wildlife.How is yourR3 and what do you shoot?
They are certainly amazing photographers.An R3, 1DX3 and an R5 in the same house - £££! Just sold my 1Dx2 - thinking what to do next…
Temporary gas...I am temporarily reformed. I decided that buying a Fujifilm X100V would solve my problem. It arrived on Tuesday and I have been free from temptation since last Wednesday. That said the new DJI drone looks interesting.
Yes - and you can sell them on here for others who have 2.8 zoom Canon GASI feel it may be coming to time to exchange the ~1 year old 24-70 and 70-200s for their RF counterparts..![]()
I wish I had this talent...Actually talked myself out of buying another new bag today…
Is the RF glass so much better? I've swapped camera bodies to R5 but so far held off replacing any of the EF lenses as they are working flawlessly.Having had my Canon R3 for four months I now am itching to get some of that RF glass but . . . . I was hoping to win the Euro Millions. Oh, well the RF 15-35mm f2.8L, RF 24-70mm f2.8 L and RF 70-200mm f2.8 L will have to wait for a few more years![]()
Its taken years of meditation.I wish I had this talent...
Well done! When I do that, I mentally store it up to justify whatever I buy when I don't resist.. see my next post!Actually talked myself out of buying another new bag today…
…staying strong
Bought myself a used RF35mm today - a reward for something positive that happened this week. That is my excuse and I am sticking to it.![]()
Happy to chat when the guilt sets in and you feel you need to offload it![]()
Is the RF glass so much better? I've swapped camera bodies to R5 but so far held off replacing any of the EF lenses as they are working flawlessly.
Thanks James, this is very helpful. I have the 70-200 2.8 v2 and it is working great, I'm not bothered by the adapter or the weight in any way. I did have the EF 1.2 primes but they were so slow to focus that I found them unusable for events and switched to the 1.4 versions, 85 from canon and 50 from sigma, both also working great with the adapter.The only 2 I would say are “night and day” difference in quality are the 1.2 primes compared to their EF counterparts.
The 70-200 2.8 (from an IQ perspective alone) isn’t worth the upgrade from the EF version in my opinion.
Some say both the focus speed and IS are much better. But I had no problems with either on my Mark II version.
If (like myself) the adapter doesn’t bother you. I’d save your cash.


