Sir SR
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 5,635
- Name
- Shaheed
- Edit My Images
- No
joescrivens said:chelseas goals were ok, not as good as either of liverpools - one was a penalty.
Liverpool's first was excellent.
joescrivens said:chelseas goals were ok, not as good as either of liverpools - one was a penalty.

There's obviously something not quite right with him. I doubt he can even explain himself why he does these things.
Biting, stamping, spitting, eye gauging, hair pulling, heel raking, verbal abuse - the list goes on. To make matters worse he nearly always makes out he's the one that's been offended.
Yesterday's bite was so funny - he started off with a sore head and then ended up limping.
He made Dalglish and Liverpool a laughing stock last time around and it's good to see their PR has woken up. I just find it funny now.
What a dull premier league season we'd have had if it wasn't for luis Suarez. His antics and performances have been the talking points of an otherwise dull season. Title seen up months ago, relegation battle very predictable for the last few weeks.
What a dull premier league season we'd have had if it wasn't for luis Suarez. His antics and performances have been the talking points of an otherwise dull season. Title seen up months ago, relegation battle very predictable for the last few weeks.
I don't know about Mike Tyson defending Suarez, though they did say on MOTD2 that he followed Suarez this evening.
The only non-liverpool fan I've seen defend him has been Joey Barton, which probably says it all.


I'm warming up the oven today to cook the pie for a couple of you on here![]()

You mean the "United can win the league today not 8 weeks ago pie"![]()
Gael Quiche
You're first up for a piece Phil - bring a large serving of your words![]()
Some this on QPR forum, lots flying around, some excellent, some pretty bad. Examples below.
#PlayersOnTheSuarezMenu
Bacary Lasagne
Shaun Wright Fillets...
Dimitar Burgertov...
Barry Bannana
Gael Quiche
Ryan Shortcrust
Juicy Jaaskelainen?

I dont get the fuss - while biting is wrong, as is spitting, is it really worse than say the recent bad tackles made and unpunished which could have ended a players career. If I had the choice to receive a bite or a 2 footed lunge at my knee I know what I would choose, so anything over a 3 game ban is not needed imo.
I dont get the fuss - while biting is wrong, as is spitting, is it really worse than say the recent bad tackles made and unpunished which could have ended a players career. If I had the choice to receive a bite or a 2 footed lunge at my knee I know what I would choose, so anything over a 3 game ban is not needed imo.
Well at least a two footed lunge is related to the game of football at least - two players coming together with the parts of the body that the game revolves around.
Biting someone is indefensible.
What about a headbut - fellaini recieved a 3 match ban for a deliberate headbutt. Why is a bite worse than a headbutt exactly?
None of the are defendable actions and should all result in the same punishment
surely deliberatly raking your studs down someones leg is also indefensible - no matter if it uses the parts of the body the game revolves around.
What about a headbut - fellaini recieved a 3 match ban for a deliberate headbutt. Why is a bite worse than a headbutt exactly?
None of the are defendable actions and should all result in the same punishment
And straight away, in the post match interview, Moyes said Fellaini should be banned and that the club would accept any punishment given.
Liverpool come out and give the age old response of "We didn't see it"....but managed to see other incidents during the game; no class!!
Suarez has previous with 'raking' players and head butting a ref.
Biting is disgusting though. He could have given the poor fella rabies.
but you still didn't answer the question.
Why is a bite more disgusting than raking studs down a players shin or deliberately stamping on someone. The question isnt whether suarez has done them or not - it's why is a bite worse?
Also, you can only give rabies if you had rabies in the first place. I can't confirm or deny if Suarez did indeed have rabies to give
I don't think it is 'worse' I just think it's more 'disgusting'. My own view.
The rabies comment was a obviously in jest.
I can't confirm or deny if Suarez did indeed have rabies to give
I'd hardly call Suarez's teeth a hidden weapon. I mean they are there for all to see haha.
On a more serious note though I'm a liverpool fan and I do believe he should receive a ban for what he did. As for the length of that ban that is the tough question.
In my view biting is no more of an offence than spiting and so should be dealt with accordingly. I don't recall a player getting thrown out of the game for spitting and likewise Suarez should not be thrown out of the game either.
In my view biting is no more of an offence than spiting and so should be dealt with accordingly. I don't recall a player getting thrown out of the game for spitting and likewise Suarez should not be thrown out of the game either.
I'd hardly call Suarez's teeth a hidden weapon. I mean they are there for all to see haha.

FA people said:while the standard punishment for violent conduct was a three-match ban, that was "clearly insufficient in these circumstances".
He's got 24hrs to chew over it![]()
