The topic of an Arsenal takeover is an interesting one. I've argued from the off that Kroenke's interest was never in long-term ownership of the club, and considering our lack of transfer investment despite the cash sitting in the bank it certainly suggests that he's had a mind towards enhancing our enterprise-value rather than our results on the pitch. Now, sitting on the edge of our first finish outside the top 4 for 16 years the club stands to lose out considerably in terms of finances and reputation (granted, the new TV deal can largely offset the financial penalty for this season) and so it strikes me as a very good time to get maximum value for his shares, which adds to the credibility of such a bid happening.
It also provides a very interesting alternative to Usmanov, who to my mind has always been a worse prospect than Kroenke. Just. The last thing I want to happen is for us to turn into Chelsea. Abramovich's ownership and money has turned the fans into the most fickle, impatient, and hostile fan base in the league. I'd hate for us to go that route and feel that we have an entitlement to success.
Where the club has fallen short is in utilising our resources and brand. We've long undersold ourselves on the commercial front, and for too long our profits haven't been reinvested in strengthening the squad. If new ownership could cause a shake-up and see a release of those funds we already have into transfers then that would be ideal. I'd be much more reluctant to see our appeal for FFP undermined by a new ownership flooding the club with their own money.
A shake-up at management level (Peter Hill-Wood, Ivan Gazidis, Richard Law etc.) would be very welcome.
It's an interesting idea, but I'll take a lot of convincing before I support it entirely.