The Amazing Sony A1/A7/A9/APS-C & Anything else welcome Mega Thread!

Think I might start changing a couple of our A7III's over too A7IV's my missus is loving the one she got when they launched and the autofocus seems much improved since the firmware update although she wasn't having anywhere near the issues that some were having even before the update.

Have just placed an order for one there to start the process.
 
One thing I'd have to decide is do I like tilty screens or fully articulated screens. Years ago when I had the Panny G1 I liked its fully articulated screen but I've since got used to the tilting screens the cameras I have now have. I suppose the ideal would be a screen that did it all.

Do you have a preference?
 
One thing I'd have to decide is do I like tilty screens or fully articulated screens. Years ago when I had the Panny G1 I liked its fully articulated screen but I've since got used to the tilting screens the cameras I have now have. I suppose the ideal would be a screen that did it all.

Do you have a preference?

I prefer the tilt rather than fully articulated but I am willing to live with it. Pluses and minuses with both, fully articulated is better for portrait but not as good for low down etc.Fully articulated is also prone to more problems have seen quite a few people breaking them already. Just have to live with cameras being built to suit the video guys now.

Really just jumping for the extra res and the real time a.f plus my older A7III's are hitting over 3 year old now and that is usually when I swop them out. We have a couple of newer A7III's as well but will swop the older ones out first.
 
Last edited:
One thing I'd have to decide is do I like tilty screens or fully articulated screens. Years ago when I had the Panny G1 I liked its fully articulated screen but I've since got used to the tilting screens the cameras I have now have. I suppose the ideal would be a screen that did it all.

Do you have a preference?
If you're not into video and don't do selfies then I think tilt screens are better, I dislike that fully articulated are a two move process to tilt it, i.e. flip out then tilt.
 
If you're not into video and don't do selfies then I think tilt screens are better, I dislike that fully articulated are a two move process to tilt it, i.e. flip out then tilt.

I sometimes use mine for lowdown shooting when I don't want to lay down or sometimes for shooting from chest or waist height when I want the different perspective. Having the screen out to the side is a bit more awkward I suppose so I suppose I'm leaning more towards tilting rather than articulating.
 
I went to pay the papers and couldn't resist the discounted easter eggs and bunny. So we all got one :D

A7 and Voigtlander 40mm f1.2 at f1.2.

icfpJaB.jpg


As you can see, only £2 :D
 
@NewBeetle That owl is spectacular.

Really made my day. Never had such a clear unobstructed opportunity for photos, the only other times I've seen a Tawny there has been lots of branches/undergrowth between us.
 
Great set but the owls are awesome...

Thanks, I'll just add that I shot the first Owl shot at 1/250s 600mm handheld and the second one at 1/320s also handheld. Testament to the image stabilisation of the A7iii and 200-600 lens, I know I couldn't have shot this slow with my previous Sigma 150-600.
 
Wonderful day yesterday at Leighton Moss RSPB

1. Tawny Owl

DSC00891-Edit-2-3 by Anthony Andrades, on Flickr

2: Cetti's Warbler

DSC01133-Edit by Anthony Andrades, on Flickr

3: Cetti's Warbler 2

DSC00852-Edit by Anthony Andrades, on Flickr

4: Chiffchaff

DSC01156-Edit by Anthony Andrades, on Flickr

5: Marsh Harrier vs Greylag Goose

DSC00550-Edit by Anthony Andrades, on Flickr

6: Tawny Owl 2

DSC00904-Edit by Anthony Andrades, on Flickr

What a great set of images.
The Cetti‘s very elusive - heard, but not that often seen.
Also - what a testament to the 200-600mm lens!
 
Fabulous set of images and like others have said the owl shot is a cracker. Was this down near the lower hide?
I’m really missing my LM visits due to a broken ankle…grrrr☹️
 
Fabulous set of images and like others have said the owl shot is a cracker. Was this down near the lower hide?
I’m really missing my LM visits due to a broken ankle…grrrr☹️

Yes mate, the small clearing right before turning off the main path to lower hide. Hope your ankle heals quickly and you can get back
 
The rumor site says the Sony 24-70mm f2.8 II will be announced tomorrow.


That's nice.
 
Last price drop on the voigtlander 50mm, then it goes in the back of a cupboard.

If you deffo want it to go and it doesn't sell here wont you give usual online buyers a try? I don't mean evil bay, more Ffordes or someone like that?
 
If you deffo want it to go and it doesn't sell here wont you give usual online buyers a try? I don't mean evil bay, more Ffordes or someone like that?

Might well try online after a while, as at the moment the lens is in the original box and put away.
 
The rumor site says the Sony 24-70mm f2.8 II will be announced tomorrow.


That's nice.

F8 in good light from the original 24-70GM did me nicely yesterday, but should f2.8 get a nice step up like the 70-200 II, I will be happy! shame it isn't going to be f2.0 :D

CH - New Buildings - 45 of 65 - A1200528-ARW_DxO_DeepPRIME_2048.jpg
 
Last edited:
"Leaked" picture of that 24-70mm...


Do people see aperture rings on lenses like this or any other as being the deciding thing?
 
Last edited:
"Leaked" picture of that 24-70mm...


Do people see aperture rings on lenses like this or any other as being the deciding thing?
Yes it's a huge plus for me to have an aperture ring.
 
I think for me ease of use is the answer. None of my film era lenses are a problem and neither are my modern Voigtlanders as the aperture rings are all in the right place but with a bigger zoom I suppose my hand might not be in the right position to work an aperture ring which is closer to the camera easily.
 
"Leaked" picture of that 24-70mm...


Do people see aperture rings on lenses like this or any other as being the deciding thing?
I never use them so it doesn't matter to me or not. I wish they'd go back to non fly by wire focus rings so we have the distance/range scale back on lenses.
 
I never use them so it doesn't matter to me or not. I wish they'd go back to non fly by wire focus rings so we have the distance/range scale back on lenses.

Yup but I don't think that'll happen.
 
We were going to go walking in the hills today as the weather forecast said it was going to be nice but it isn't, there's complete cloud cover, the sky is just a white grey nothingness and the light is just dead. We'll still go out but here's no real point taking a camera. I have about a zillion pictures taken on days like this so I don't need any more.
 
Rain on a bus windscreen (A65 / Tamron 16~300mm)...

Rain on windscreen A65 DSC00252.JPG
 
I've just been using my Sigma 85mm DG DN to analyse the difference between f1.4 and f1.8 and I've noticed that if I use burst shooting the focus often misses critical focus (static subject) whereas single shot seems to nail it the vast majority of time, has anyone else noticed this with the lens? (I use BBF AF-C)
 
I've just been using my Sigma 85mm DG DN to analyse the difference between f1.4 and f1.8 and I've noticed that if I use burst shooting the focus often misses critical focus (static subject) whereas single shot seems to nail it the vast majority of time, has anyone else noticed this with the lens? (I use BBF AF-C)
Nothing to do with the lens but the way the camera works.
At shallow DOF your best using AF-S obviously easier with static subjects.
 
Nothing to do with the lens but the way the camera works.
At shallow DOF your best using AF-S obviously easier with static subjects.

That hasn’t been my experience at all have no problem with focus using any of my f/1.4 lenses or the 50 f/1.2 in Af-C at 20 fps
 
Nothing to do with the lens but the way the camera works.
At shallow DOF your best using AF-S obviously easier with static subjects.
From my experience with Sony AF-C has usually been more reliable than AF-S but not with this lens, I'll just have to change the way I use with with static subjects. Hopefully it'll be reliable on the session day I have booked, I'll be using AF-C as people tend to move ;)

I'll get the dock to see if there's an update, I'm guessing you need the Sigma specific one and the Samyang dock won't work on Sigma lenses?
 
From my experience with Sony AF-C has usually been more reliable than AF-S but not with this lens, I'll just have to change the way I use with with static subjects. Hopefully it'll be reliable on the session day I have booked, I'll be using AF-C as people tend to move ;)

I'll get the dock to see if there's an update, I'm guessing you need the Sigma specific one and the Samyang dock won't work on Sigma lenses?

Lenses with slower AF may not keep up with the tiny fluctuations/corrections/calculations of the continuous autofocus
 
From my experience with Sony AF-C has usually been more reliable than AF-S but not with this lens, I'll just have to change the way I use with with static subjects. Hopefully it'll be reliable on the session day I have booked, I'll be using AF-C as people tend to move ;)

I'll get the dock to see if there's an update, I'm guessing you need the Sigma specific one and the Samyang dock won't work on Sigma lenses?
Looks like there's a camera update too, I'm still on version 2.0 and there's now 3.2
 
Lenses with slower AF may not keep up with the tiny fluctuations/corrections/calculations of the continuous autofocus
Yeah, no matter how good they get I still don't find 3rd party are as good as the better Sony lenses.
 
Lenses with slower AF may not keep up with the tiny fluctuations/corrections/calculations of the continuous autofocus

That's a good point.

Not that it affects me as my A7's AF focus is about as fast as MF :D
 
I suppose info and reviews of the Sony 24-70mm will come thick and fast. Size comparison...

"Sony 24-70mm GM II size comparison: It is by far(!) the world’s lightest zoom in its class!"​



View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hxG9fXG2_qk
 
From my experience with Sony AF-C has usually been more reliable than AF-S but not with this lens, I'll just have to change the way I use with with static subjects. Hopefully it'll be reliable on the session day I have booked, I'll be using AF-C as people tend to move ;)

I'll get the dock to see if there's an update, I'm guessing you need the Sigma specific one and the Samyang dock won't work on Sigma lenses?

Can’t you check Signa’s website to see if there is a firmware update available before you buy the dock?

Third party lenses will never be as capable in terms of a.f as oem. Surprised at that though as the 85 has a great rep. What’s it like at say 10fps? It won’t do the full 20fps maxes out at 15fps usually for third party lenses.

Maybe the fact it can’t do the full 20fps is causing some sort of issues, just a thought.
 
Back
Top