
Egret at the Powburn by robert shearer, on FlickrThanks Rob.Very nice Bob .
Rob
Pied Wagtail at Powburn Prestwick... by robert shearer, on FlickrOr E.T.All that's missing is a T-Rex.

This could be the best woodlands photo I've seen from you. Really good, bags of atmosphere. Could be straight out of a Spielberg movie. All that's missing is a T-Rex. Was one not nearby when you took the shot?![]()
Or E.T.![]()
www.sonyalpharumors.com
But as I have found I'm spending 99% of the time using the full electronic shutter, and it's mapped to a custom button so only a press away.I've been following this on Fred Miranda...
I can't see myself selling my Sony 35mm f2.8 as it gives such a compact combination but the Sigma 35mm f2 could replace my Sony 35mm f1.8. I do also fancy the 65mm as it could replace both my Sony 55 and 85mm f1.8's as I only use either once in a blue moon as the 55mm has largely been replaced with 35mm and the 85mm seems just too tight for me. I even like the look of the 24mm.
On page 39 they're whinging about Sony not having an auto option to switch between mechanical and electronic shutter. This does seem to be a failing. My Panasonic cameras have an auto option and switch seamlessly between the two. It's one of the things that puts me off the A7c.
The Sigma 35mm f2 is looking like it's going to be good.
The new Sigma 35mm and 65mm f/2.0 FE lenses tested by Marc Alhadeff | sonyalpharumors
Marc Alhadeff from SonyAlpha.Blog tested both new lenses. About the Sigma 35mm f/2.0 FE he writes: The Sigma 35mm F2 DG DN Contemporary (616 euros) is an excellent lens that is very well balanced : among the 35mm F1.8/F2 it is one of the sharpest, it has the softest background blur, best bokeh...www.sonyalpharumors.com
Think it might replace my Zony 35 f2.8.
But as I have found I'm spending 99% of the time using the full electronic shutter, and it's mapped to a custom button so only a press away.

I'd never replace my 35 with anything longer.I have been using the samyang 45mm f1.8 and have really liked it with the A7C. it weighs only 160g and not much larger than the zeiss 35mm/2.8. I can recommend replacing both your 35 and 50 with just one lens.
though that sigma 35mm f2 looks like thing of beauty. its designed very nicely and I am sucker for nice looking gadgets....
Like wot he saidthats a lovely image
- you’re the leaf maestro.thats a lovely image
Like wot he said- you’re the leaf maestro.
Thank you guys. The other half really likes this one so far too! It's currently in top spot for framing!
I still have the occasional thoughts about something AF in the 35-45mm range but not fully convinced or committed to anything yet.
That's usually where mine is anyway ...Get thee behind me GAS.![]()
If I'm by myself I'll probably pick a manual lens but when with others or for people pictures my choice is AF as it cuts down on saying things like "That's great, hold on a mo" and makes me less the geek with the camera holding things up.
I'm still thinking about the Sigma 35mm f2 but reading that it has more ca than the Sony f1.8 puts me off, but then again it looks to be built lovely. I'll wait for Fred Miranda to get a copy and review it.
The answer could well be the Sigma 35mm f2 as it will have some of the feel of a manual lens as it's metal and has an aperture ring. I don't suppose the focus ring will have the same feel but maybe the whole experience will be close enough to a nicely built manual lens to make it liveable. Plus, for getting the picture quickly and so not annoying people AF for general stuff and AF and face detect for people pictures are lovely things.
These new-fangled Sigmas, with aperture rings like Fujis, sound ideal for use with the A7C.
Why not map the settings to a Mode number, say 1 for manual lenses.On the subject of aperture control, on my A7C I have mapped the C button to alternately swap between standard behaviour and putting shutter speed onto the control dial and ISO to the wheel, for use on manual lenses with an aperture ring. Works fine, except that if I power the camera off and on (as I generally do between shots) it reverts to standard. I would like it to keep its previous setting. Am I doing something wrong?
It’s a thought. This is normally the only setting I change apart from the usual suspects, and then only for one, or at most, two lenses.Why not map the settings to a Mode number, say 1 for manual lenses.
I never use them as I mostly use the same settings all the time only changing the odd thing from time to time.
It would definitely depend on the rendering & feel of the manual focus. I've so far not been a fan of focus-by-wire.
Why not map the settings to a Mode number, say 1 for manual lenses.
I never use them as I mostly use the same settings all the time only changing the odd thing from time to time.