Yeah, it's a stonechatI absolutely love this photo. Stonechat right?
Love the third one! Nice set.View attachment 270813View attachment 270814View attachment 270815View attachment 270816View attachment 270817
Some images I took last week for a friend at his work. He was needing images for the website showing them working.
So I dropped by for an hour in the middle of dinner service, reasonably happy with them.But was kind of restricted in where I could stand/ shoot as they were busy and similarly the kitchen had quite a lot of distracting items/rubbish I couldn’t move.
Never done anything like this before though.
Love them all but #4 & 5 are amazing. She's a stunner and I can't get enough of these!1.
A7R00200-Edit by TDG-77, on Flickr
2.
A7R00215 by TDG-77, on Flickr
3.
A7R00223 by TDG-77, on Flickr
4.
A7R00227-Edit by TDG-77, on Flickr
5.
A7R00248 by TDG-77, on Flickr
Thanks. Yeah I really like it. AF acquisition is faster than the Nikon, although I would say with the dog running towards me there's about the same amount of missed shots. I definitely think I've done the right thing though, having one system instead of two is a plus and there is far more choice of native mount lenses.Really like #4.
How are you finding Sony?
Thanks very muchLove them all but #4 & 5 are amazing. She's a stunner and I can't get enough of these!
Thanks. Yeah I really like it. AF acquisition is faster than the Nikon, although I would say with the dog running towards me there's about the same amount of missed shots. I definitely think I've done the right thing though, having one system instead of two is a plus and there is far more choice of native mount lenses.
Thanks very much![]()
That was using the Sony 100-400mmProbably because you are using Samyang![]()
User errorThat was using the Sony 100-400mm![]()
then I blame you![]()
User error
I was about to say the sameWe KNOW the camera is perfect.![]()

I absolutely love this photo. Stonechat right?
DSC09890 by Anthony Andrades, on Flickr
DSC09761 by Anthony Andrades, on Flickr
DSC09747 by Anthony Andrades, on Flickr
DSC09577 by Anthony Andrades, on FlickrUser error
DSC01660 by Anthony Andrades, on Flickr
DSC01564 by Anthony Andrades, on Flickr
DSC01612 by Anthony Andrades, on Flickr
DSC01668 by Anthony Andrades, on Flickr
The meeting pool colour by Toni Ertl, on Flickr
Male Mandarin Duck by robert shearer, on Flickr
Male Mandarin Duck by robert shearer, on Flickr
Bank Vole by robert shearer, on Flickr
Bank Vole by robert shearer, on Flickr
Male Blackbird by robert shearer, on Flickr
Siskin.... by robert shearer, on FlickrNice.One from the woods between Hartney Wintney and Reading - the area has a lot of standing water right now.
The meeting pool colour by Toni Ertl, on Flickr
I tried a bunch of different things with the Sammy 18mm, 45mm and 85mm, but only the images from the 85 really please me. I'll give the 45 a couple more outings, but it's likely to appear in the classifieds soon if I can't make it work for me.
Cheers Toni.Thanks Robert - yours too.
I'm especially impressed by the rodent shots (water vole?).
A very nice set, looks like the lens is working out for you.a few from today....
Male Mandarin Duck by robert shearer, on Flickr
Male Mandarin Duck by robert shearer, on Flickr
Bank Vole by robert shearer, on Flickr
Bank Vole by robert shearer, on Flickr
Male Blackbird by robert shearer, on Flickr
Siskin.... by robert shearer, on Flickr
Thanks,A very nice set, looks like the lens is working out for you.
Which samyang lens are good? Might get one or two. Though about 18 2.8
If I was using Sony I'd get the 18 and maybe the 45 1.8 to start, they look very good for the money. The 35 1.4 and 85mm 1.4 look even better, though the 35 is pretty big and heavy
I think the 24mm is worth a lookWhich samyang lens are good? Might get one or two. Though about 18 2.8
Which samyang lens are good? Might get one or two. Though about 18 2.8
Which samyang lens are good? Might get one or two. Though about 18 2.8
From personal ownership, the 85 f1.4 is excellent, the 35 f2.8 and 18 f2.8 are good. I have a 45 f1.8 which is optically OK stopped down a little but a bit soft wide open. I also had a 50 f1.4, and that was very pleasing optically, though a little slower to focus (but much better focussing than the Sony 50 f1.8) and will probably get another at some stage.
Sounds like your 45 is a dud, quite a few people have decentered copies of these as well, Samyang reliability is non existent. I had to send back my first copy of the 45. The replacement is very sharp including wide open a.f performance after the firmware update is okay not oem good but bearable.
I think the key with samyang is to ensure they are on latest firmware and don't have expectations of them performing like gm lenses.