The Amazing Sony A1/A7/A9/APS-C & Anything else welcome Mega Thread!

nandbytes said:
Who asked for free service!
You are mistaking good customer service with free service
Click to expand...

My local Volvo specialist replaced my brake pads free of charge and lent me a V40 for the day.

That was both free and good service! :D

I never had free service from Elstree, only ever sent stuff in for repair but always done right and got it back fast (Platnium CPS). Then I claim it back from insurance minus excess of £50.
 
I’ve had no issues with customer service since owning Sony bodies.
I have owned the following bodies with only the Sony A9 requiring to be sent back for the hot-shoe recall.
A7
A7 II
A7R II
A7R II
A9
A7 III

When it comes to warranty transfers they have been quick and smooth, something I believe Nikon or Canon do not offer.
Unlike Nikon & Canon, the warranty and extended warranties can be transferred to new owners which I think is great from a resale point of view.
 
woof woof said:
Just thinking about it I think the one make I think I might be wary of is Fuji as there do seem to be a few reports of cameras locking up or actually failing in one way or another and one model (I can't remember which but I think it was a fixed lens camera) seems to have a quite terrible reputation. And as the claims of being anti this or that and being a fan boy are often thrown about I'm neither a knocker or a fan boy, I'm just relating what I've read on this and other forums.

It doesn't seem to stop them being popular though. If I was buying one I think I'd wait a year when any new model comes out to give them time to iron out any issues.
Click to expand...

Pretty sure t was the XF1 which had the problems, it was switched on by tuning the lens. Lovely small camera but it was a question of when not if it failed
 
twist said:
You may want to read about Nikon UK in the d750 thread if you think the grass is greener.
Click to expand...
How is Nikon being crap a good excuse for Sony being crap. That just makes them both crap.
Two wrongs don't make a right :p
 
nandbytes said:
Lol been shooting longer than you with Sony

I don't need find a reason or justify anything. The above statement I have made before many many times, it's nothing new
Click to expand...
Maybe. Doesn't mean you don't wanna jump ship lol [emoji23]

Stick with Sony mate. Stop looking and start shooting.
 
Change of topic, since I started this whole argument [emoji23]

Samyang 35mm 1.4fe or sigma 35mm 1.4 art?

I've watched a load of reviews and people favour the samyang image quality surprisingly, even though I imagine they are both decent. The sigma is more expensive but comes with a 3 year warranty.
 
Andy82 said:
Change of topic, since I started this whole argument [emoji23]

Samyang 35mm 1.4fe or sigma 35mm 1.4 art?

I've watched a load of reviews and people favour the samyang image quality surprisingly, even though I imagine they are both decent. The sigma is more expensive but comes with a 3 year warranty.
Click to expand...

I've had all 3, incl Zeiss, optically the sigma is best... By a fair bit.
 
addicknchips said:
Didn’t they just have to tighten the screws with a Philips though?
Click to expand...

I read d750 weren't even sniffed till weeks later and many calls. It was definitely a screw thing though.... What a recall.... Half of the d750s had to be replaced, but I was still impressed that they recognised and dealt with it at their own expense.... Plus a free shutter no matter the count.
 
Last edited:
twist said:
Adapted on a7rii, native on a7iii.... As for your next question... Native without a doubt.
Click to expand...
[emoji1] The native version looks like they just fitted an adaptor and then smoothed it over. I'm half tempted with the samyang.
 
Andy82 said:
[emoji1] The native version looks like they just fitted an adaptor and then smoothed it over. I'm half tempted with the samyang.
Click to expand...

Get the Samyang then.... And then sell it and buy the sigma :D
 
jonneymendoza said:
Maybe. Doesn't mean you don't wanna jump ship lol [emoji23]

Stick with Sony mate. Stop looking and start shooting.
Click to expand...
I shoot Sony mainly because it's the only manufacturer that offers FF EVF cameras (bar Leica) since A99 days. Soon that won't be unique to Sony so they'll have to do something extra ;)

If I find something better all things considered inc. costs I'll jump ship otherwise I'll stay. Simples :D
 
Any cheaper alternatives to the 70-200 that can do decent low light sports? Any longer primes our there that might work?

Anyone using the 70-200 F4?
 
Last edited:
nandbytes said:
I shoot Sony mainly because it's the only manufacturer that offers FF EVF cameras (bar Leica) since A99 days. Soon that won't be unique to Sony so they'll have to do something extra ;)

If I find something better all things considered inc. costs I'll jump ship otherwise I'll stay. Simples :D
Click to expand...

Oh man, we had your leaving party sorted and everything. :(
 
nandbytes said:
I shoot Sony mainly because it's the only manufacturer that offers FF EVF cameras (bar Leica) since A99 days. Soon that won't be unique to Sony so they'll have to do something extra ;)

If I find something better all things considered inc. costs I'll jump ship otherwise I'll stay. Simples :D
Click to expand...

From the outside looking in (I'm following Canikon with interest but have no intention of buying) I can't see what the new systems offer over Sony. I don't have legacy Nikon AF lenses and I'm not a blogger :D

What does the Nikon offer that's got you interested?
 
Andy82 said:
Change of topic, since I started this whole argument [emoji23]

Samyang 35mm 1.4fe or sigma 35mm 1.4 art?

I've watched a load of reviews and people favour the samyang image quality surprisingly, even though I imagine they are both decent. The sigma is more expensive but comes with a 3 year warranty.
Click to expand...

I couldn’t make my mind up so I bought the Zeiss 35 f/1.4 and the Sigma 35 f/1.4 and will just return the one I decide not to keep. They both arrived today. Camera won’t be here until the end of the week though. :mad:
 
Last edited:
woof woof said:
From the outside looking in (I'm following Canikon with interest but have no intention of buying) I can't see what the new systems offer over Sony. I don't have legacy Nikon AF lenses and I'm not a blogger :D

What does the Nikon offer that's got you interested?
Click to expand...
Nikon has the super wide mount for the £6000 0.95 Noct lens nobody can afford [emoji1]
 
f/2.8 said:
I couldn’t make my mind up so I bought the Sony 35 f/1.4 and the Sigma 35 f/1.4 and will just return the one I decide not to keep. They both arrived today. Camera won’t be here until the end of the week though. :mad:
Click to expand...
[emoji44]

I'm not rich enough yet to afford the Sony one. Why can't they do a 35mm 1.8 ffs.
 
Andy82 said:
[emoji44]

I'm not rich enough yet to afford the Sony one. Why can't they do a 35mm 1.8 ffs.
Click to expand...

Because it wouldn’t be much cheaper than a 35mm f/1.4 I would imagine so why would anyone buy it.
 
Andy82 said:
[emoji44]

I'm not rich enough yet to afford the Sony one. Why can't they do a 35mm 1.8 ffs.
Click to expand...

If the 2.8 is like £650 and the 35/1.4 is £1500. You are still looking at £1k ballpark for the 1.8. It's not going to be cheap
 
Raymond Lin said:
If the 2.8 is like £650 and the 35/1.4 is £1500. You are still looking at £1k ballpark for the 1.8. It's not going to be cheap
Click to expand...
Maybe they should bring their prices down a bit [emoji23]. Looks like it's the sigma [emoji1306]
 
Raymond Lin said:
If the 2.8 is like £650 and the 35/1.4 is £1500. You are still looking at £1k ballpark for the 1.8. It's not going to be cheap
Click to expand...

The Nikon and Canon ones wont be bargain prices and if Sony did a compact one for £800 or less and it was really good, maybe 55mm f1.8 size and good, I'd be happy enough.
 
twist said:
400mm 2.8 :D

Why cheaper? You've been using the similarly priced FL?
Click to expand...

Because what I can sell mine for will not cover a 2nd hand Sony one and I’m on a bit of a budget switching over!
 
woof woof said:
The Nikon and Canon ones wont be bargain prices and if Sony did a compact one for £800 or less and it was really good, maybe 55mm f1.8 size and good, I'd be happy enough.
Click to expand...

The Canon 35/1.4 L mk2 is £1700, more than the Sony Zeiss….(although it is better), but modern lenses now are 50% more than it was 10 years ago in the previous generations of lenses. Expect all the new Canon mirrorless lenses to match or more than Sony's. That 50/1.2, £1999….
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top