The Amazing Sony A1/A7/A9/APS-C & Anything else welcome Mega Thread!

nandbytes said:
A 35mm f1.8 please :D
Click to expand...

YES!

I may just about have room in my life for a 35mm f1.8 if it's nice and compact and if it focuses ok.

I was thinking maybe a RX1, redone so the Leica doesn't kick its bottom quite so badly :D

Or maybe a top end APS-C body?

Who knows... :D
 
Last edited:
woof woof said:
YES!

I may just about have room in my life for a 35mm f1.8 if it's nice and compact and if it focuses ok.

I was thinking maybe a RX1, redone so the Leica doesn't kick its bottom quite so badly :D

Or maybe a top end APS-C body?

Who knows... :D
Click to expand...

I have come love my big lump of glass i.e. FE35/1.4 would be sad to see it go :(

RX1RM2 is as good as leica :P
 
woof woof said:
You'd sell a 35mm f1.4 for a compact 35mm f1.8?

This is a couple of months old but some might not have seen it, "5 Reasons Why You Should CONSIDER f/1.8 Lenses OVER f/1.4 Lenses"

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGzZBymyuds&t=181s
Click to expand...

I have seen the video and I think I disagreed on most of the points :D

Regardless yes I'd consider selling my 35mm/1.4 for a compact 35mm/1.8. Though I will probably wait till I can find a used one at a good price rather than buying it outright.
 
My worries are that...

1. We wont get a compact 35mm f1.8 anytime soon.
And on that subject why is it that manufacturers often wait so long to bring out what is to many the most obvious things?
2. If and when we do get one its focus will be pants.

I waited for the 50mm f2.8 macro to come out and when it did and I got one the focus on my A7 was so unreliable it was unusable.

Time will tell.

I think I agreed with most of the video.
 
well first point is probably true unless a 3rd party manufacturer jumps in and sort's it out which could happen, I am more hopeful now with tamron, tokina, samyang in the race and sigma promising FE specific lenses.

If sony or any one else does make one I don't think focus will be bad. Only FE 50/1.8 is particularly bad and by your account FE50 macro. The rest of the lenses inc. 'budget+compact' FE28 and FE85 are blazing fast and accurate.
 
Been away for the weekend and brought the Tamron 28-75 with me but struggling with dire weather and rubbish connectivity.

Been able to take a few shots though and pretty impressed with the Tamron, especially considering the price.


Tamron 28-75 @ 75mm f8.0 by Chris Mitchell, on Flickr

Flower Bokeh Tamron 28-75mm f2.8 Di III RXD by Chris Mitchell, on Flickr

Shetland Pony - Tamron 28-75mm f2.8 Di III RXD by Chris Mitchell, on Flickr

Alpaca - Tamron 28-75mm f2.8 Di III RX by Chris Mitchell, on Flickr
 
My money is on some kind of camcorder or action cam thingy. If so I have no interest.
 
Ken Rockwell says... "Sony is the future" ...

"27 May 2018, Sunday
Sony vs. DSLR
People ask all the time, and I tell them that I prefer the in-camera JPG color rendition of Nikon and Canon for photos of places and things. I prefer the color rendition of Fuji for photos of people, but Fuji remains so buggy (dumb menu system that's only getting worse with time, AF lock never works, flaky EVF/LCD switching, still no full-frame cameras, etc.) that I've gotten over them. Sony looks good for all kinds of photos, but doesn't excel at one or the other as the other brands do. My work is all about color so I'm very picky here; most people won't notice any differences and if you shoot raw, these differences are all different.

If you're most serious about photos of landscapes and cars and animals and bugs and sunsets and buildings, go DSLR.

For people, business meetings, concerts, recitals, plays, business events, sports and action, I'd use Sony because the newest Sonys are SILENT and run at at least 10 frames per second. Also with Sony you can do everything in any light in the finder with no need for the rear LCD. I LOVE being able to set menus and see enlarged playback even in direct sunlight through the electronic finder. It makes my DSLRs seem so 1990s when I can't see playback in the finder and have to squint at a little LCD smaller than my iPhone X. Sony is the future. Sony cranks out significantly better cameras every few months. Get the A7 III, and the 24-105/4 G or 24-240 lenses and you could be done.

I'll be honest: I shoot my iPhone X a lot. Don't we all? I probably use it more than my big cameras for personal work unless I'm on a specific job."

Linky...

https://kenrockwell.com/tech/00-new-today.htm

:D
 
woof woof said:
Ken Rockwell says... "Sony is the future" ...

"27 May 2018, Sunday
Sony vs. DSLR
People ask all the time, and I tell them that I prefer the in-camera JPG color rendition of Nikon and Canon for photos of places and things. I prefer the color rendition of Fuji for photos of people, but Fuji remains so buggy (dumb menu system that's only getting worse with time, AF lock never works, flaky EVF/LCD switching, still no full-frame cameras, etc.) that I've gotten over them. Sony looks good for all kinds of photos, but doesn't excel at one or the other as the other brands do. My work is all about color so I'm very picky here; most people won't notice any differences and if you shoot raw, these differences are all different.

If you're most serious about photos of landscapes and cars and animals and bugs and sunsets and buildings, go DSLR.

For people, business meetings, concerts, recitals, plays, business events, sports and action, I'd use Sony because the newest Sonys are SILENT and run at at least 10 frames per second. Also with Sony you can do everything in any light in the finder with no need for the rear LCD. I LOVE being able to set menus and see enlarged playback even in direct sunlight through the electronic finder. It makes my DSLRs seem so 1990s when I can't see playback in the finder and have to squint at a little LCD smaller than my iPhone X. Sony is the future. Sony cranks out significantly better cameras every few months. Get the A7 III, and the 24-105/4 G or 24-240 lenses and you could be done.

I'll be honest: I shoot my iPhone X a lot. Don't we all? I probably use it more than my big cameras for personal work unless I'm on a specific job."

Linky...

https://kenrockwell.com/tech/00-new-today.htm

:D
Click to expand...

well if Ken says it, it must be true
 
chrism_scotland said:
Been away for the weekend and brought the Tamron 28-75 with me but struggling with dire weather and rubbish connectivity.

Been able to take a few shots though and pretty impressed with the Tamron, especially considering the price.


Tamron 28-75 @ 75mm f8.0 by Chris Mitchell, on Flickr

Flower Bokeh Tamron 28-75mm f2.8 Di III RXD by Chris Mitchell, on Flickr

Shetland Pony - Tamron 28-75mm f2.8 Di III RXD by Chris Mitchell, on Flickr

Alpaca - Tamron 28-75mm f2.8 Di III RX by Chris Mitchell, on Flickr
Click to expand...

face any focussing issues?
 
twist said:
Not the 70200
Click to expand...

Why not and what do you prefer?

It'll be no surprise to know that I prefer 35/50.

Wider can be nice for environmental and deliberate perspective distortion and longer can be better for avoiding messy backgrounds and going for nice bokeh but I prefer 35/50 as I'll be close enough to interact whilst being able to include context and be able to play with depth if needed.

Dunno what the vid says as I haven't watched it yet.
 
Last edited:
woof woof said:
Why not and what do you prefer?

It'll be no surprise to know that I prefer 35/50.

Wider can be nice for environmental and deliberate perspective distortion and longer can be better for avoiding messy backgrounds and going for nice bokeh but I prefer 35/50 as I'll be close enough to interact whilst being able to include context and be able to play with depth if needed.
Click to expand...

I like anything from 35 to 85 for various situations. Big zooms intimidate, they weigh a ton and i don't like the working distance at the longer FL.
 
200mm you are miles away, difficult to give direction and if you are in a busy space, people will get in the way a lot.
 
woof woof said:
Why not and what do you prefer?

It'll be no surprise to know that I prefer 35/50.

Wider can be nice for environmental and deliberate perspective distortion and longer can be better for avoiding messy backgrounds and going for nice bokeh but I prefer 35/50 as I'll be close enough to interact whilst being able to include context and be able to play with depth if needed.

Dunno what the vid says as I haven't watched it yet.
Click to expand...

I'm a portrait photographer and own nothing longer than an 85mm. Might buy a 135mm sigma but not for portraits.
 
I have recently got into shooting portraits, my two main lenses are 35mm and 85mm primes. I am waiting on tamron 28-75mm for my 3rd lens for this purpose. I haven't really felt the need for anything much longer so far.

I used to own a canon 100mm f2 which I kinda prefer to the 85mm f1.8 in some cases. Unfortunately there isn't a sony native version.
 
Last edited:
nandbytes said:
I have recently got into shooting portraits, my two main lenses are 35mm and 85mm primes. I am waiting on tamron 28-75mm for my 3rd lens for this purpose. I haven't really felt the need for anything much longer so far.

I used to own a canon 100mm f2 which I kinda prefer to the 85mm f1.8 in some cases. Unfortunately there isn't a sony native version.
Click to expand...

Check out the 100mm STF it’s gorgeous
 
decigallen said:
I'm a portrait photographer and own nothing longer than an 85mm. Might buy a 135mm sigma but not for portraits.
Click to expand...

Actually one of my favorite portrait shots is of my Mrs, a tight head shot taken with a 135mm, other favorites were taken with an 85mm but generally I don't like the longer length lenses and tighter shots.

PS.
I remember once taking a shot of someone with a 150mm on my 20D... I was a short bus ride away :D
 
Last edited:
Forgot about two video files on an sd card and unfortunately formatted the disk on computer then in-camera.Tried a number of programs (sandisk, photorec, rescuva, UFU) but no joy. Am I fooked? :banghead:
 
Last edited:
dcash29 said:
Forgot about two video files on an sd card and unfortunately formatted the disk on computer then in-camera.Tried a number of programs (sandisk, photorec, rescuva, UFU) but no joy. Am I fooked? :banghead:
Click to expand...

Unless you did a low level format, or have subsequently used the card afterwards, the data should still be there.
 
Ye I used it and works great. Bought mine ages ago! Like back in August mate with the lens.
footman said:
When I was looking for one the only company in the world seemingly that had them was Digitalrev.
Apparently they have one in the warehouse with my name on it, we shall see!
Have you used the combination yet?
Click to expand...
 
The rumor site on the Voigtlander 35mm f1.4...

"Nokton CLASSIC 35mm/f1.4 on the #SonyA9. Optically the lens isn't top notch but it looks gorgeous on the A7-A9 series!"

Linky...

https://www.sonyalpharumors.com/sony-tidbits-799/#disqus_thread

I'd argue with the "isn't top notch" bit though. The extreme corners are never pixel peeping sharp at 100% but other than that and the bokeh being old stylie at f1.4-1.8 or so I'd say that it's a very good lens and sharp enough in the central area from f1.4 and sharp across the frame soon after.

I agree more with this guy...

https://admiringlight.com/blog/review-voigtlander-35mm-f1-4-nokton-classic-e-mount/

"Only you can determine whether you like the way this lens draws, or if you hate it. But for my use, I really like the look I can get from this lens. Wide open it gives a very unique look, and stopped down it provides lovely tonality and good sharpness over the entire frame, save for the extreme corners. Sharpness is pretty good at f/1.4, but does have a little softness due to spherical aberration, and stopping down is a must when focused near the lens’ minimum focus distance."
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top