I think he's finding the canon gear terrible that's why it's not quite as good as it should be. Sell the canon rubbish@jonneymendoza why not just use the 5d4 and 100-400 or 70200 you already own?! Seems nuts to buy the same lens for 2 systems.
Or just sell the Canon gear.
I think he's finding the canon gear terrible that's why it's not quite as good as it should be. Sell the canon rubbish
Yea i did and got nikon insteadI think he's finding the canon gear terrible that's why it's not quite as good as it should be. Sell the canon rubbish
Yea i did and got nikon instead
Nikon, eh, why not just stick with one system now that you have the Sony A9?Yea i did and got nikon instead
I'd post less if other people posted more
I'm sure you must have some pictures you could post here????
A7 and 35mm f2.8 in northern England
View attachment 105430
A7 and 35mm f2.8 in Thailand
View attachment 105431
View attachment 105432
NPH00046 by Neil Hinder, on Flickr
NPH000991 by Neil Hinder, on Flickr
NPH00099 by Neil Hinder, on FlickrI'm close to ditching Canon for Sony completelyNikon, eh, why not just stick with one system now that you have the Sony A9?![]()
I'm close to ditching Canon for Sony completely
Hmm whilst I don't have much in the way of interesting images, you [as the thread owner to boot] seem to have changed your tune in regard to my supporting someone who asked if we could post more images to the thread even gave us the lecture that there are a gazillion threads for that and that as it is a gear thread you were not in favour. Now you want images ???

Yea stop posting picsIs this what you're referring to?
https://www.talkphotography.co.uk/t...r-sony-users-too.511885/page-420#post-7864768
And just to save you clicking the link I'll copy and paste what I wrote...
"About pictures. v words.
This section of the forum is about gear and isn't necessarily a place to post pretty pictures.
The pictures I've posted in here have often been to show what the gear can do (or as it's me... what it can't do with me pressing the buttons and how I can f*** it up big style...) but I also post pretty not really showing off the gear pictures too
I like picturesbut I can't really complain if people just want to talk as this is the gear section and there are about a million threads on this forum to post pictures (landscape, portrait etc... there are hundreds of them...) if people don't want to post them here
Anyway..."
I then go on to post a picture. Of my intended as it happens.
Thinking about why I posted, as far as I can remember people were talking about the number or lack of pictures and I just commented. That's all. I'm not Big Brother. I don't own the thread, I just created it. Anyone and everyone on this forum has the same level of ownership. I can't ban, edit content, report or do anything else beyond what others can do other than the title and I've only changed that for a bit of fun.
It's not my thread.
I don't remember lecturing you or anyone else or if I appeared to in this or other instances it was a joke as I have a sense of humor and I use it in this thread/on this site. Sometimes it isn't picked up on and people don't get "it" or me and in those cases I usually explain but in this instance I simply can't think why you seem to have got a bee in your bonnet over this.
Reading my own post back it's pretty clear to me that I posted how I feel. I think my post is pretty clear. I like pictures but I can't complain if people don't post many/any as this is a gear thread. And to repeat, I like pictures and if you go back to page 1 I've probably posted as many pictures in here as anyone. A lot of my pictures have been gear related... as in look what this old Minolta lens is capable of... but I think it's pretty clear that I've also posted a lot of pictures just for the joy of it.
A7 with Minolta 35mm f1.8.
Looking out at me looking in at you.
View attachment 105488
Soz if I've rubbed you up the wrong way Jamie but maybe you've just misunderstood what I posted.
I have no problem what so ever with people posting pictures and in fact I quite like looking at them even when they're better than mine
![]()
untitled-161.jpg by Jon Richy, on Flickrno IDEA!
Sitting in the BA lounge at Heathrow en-route to Berlin, I'll makre sure and get some shots posted up this week!
Sure.. Canon 1DX II is a dinosaurwhat's with all this picture posting!! could you be please go back to b***hing about canon![]()
using the assisted lamp ? wtf
his
using the assisted lamp ? wtf
his
using the assisted lamp ? wtf
It's low light?
In low light it's never going to perform like a native lens. Outside it is excellent. For the price it is excellent.
My copy is fine in low light. Doesn't hunt like that. Shoot in af c bro.Didn't Jonney say it's the same as native? Looks very slow. In good light it looks alright but still not what I would call fast.
With the adapter it's still £800 in terms of Sony it's cheap I guess.
Didn't Jonney say it's the same as native? Looks very slow. In good light it looks alright but still not what I would call fast.
With the adapter it's still £800 in terms of Sony it's cheap I guess.
If you are starting out on Sony. Get native.
Then the A7R2 and metabones with 35mm works a dream.Nope, I like the ART to much... native lenses are also silly money.