addicknchips
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 9,795
- Name
- Jonathan
- Edit My Images
- No
That's a lovely shot above there, Jonathan![]()
Thanks Alan. Was worth nearly losing my fingers to frost bite
That's a lovely shot above there, Jonathan![]()
Perhaps Sony can put the brakes on for a moment and consider that they now have several options for consumers in terms of the cameras, and really focus on glass that is a realistic alternative to what canon and Nikon already have. 1 example: the Sony macro lens. I'm sure it's lovely. But 4 times the price of the sigma and tamrons (which are excellent)?
Whimp!Thanks Alan. Was worth nearly losing my fingers to frost bite
That is a beauty. Did you use the in camera filter or anything?View attachment 54856
Shot on the a7rii on Saturday
Your right, I think the likes of Sigma and other 3rd party vendors will make FE lenses, only a matter of time.
Sony need to slow down on the yearly body releases though and invest into firmware improvements........ How long do the top-end Canon and Nikon bodies last, surely more than 2-3 years... Canon 5DIII and Nikon D4 etc....
I would be seriously peed if Sony released the A7RIII this year!![]()
That is a beauty. Did you use the in camera filter or anything?
Thank you. No I shot it in raw but did have an nd filter on the lens. I have one of those little table top mini manfrotto tripods and put it on that. That little thing is one of the best things I've bought. Fits in your coat pocket.
When I had my Canon DSLR's I thought I'd never need lenses better than the Sigma 50 and 85mm f1.4's, 150mm f2.8 and 12-24mm. Even the lowly 20mm f1.8 was pretty good too
I can't blame Sony for going for high end quality and I'm glad they have as it gives credibility and quality to the system but as I've said multiple times almost from the off... I'd also like to see lenses which are merely very good rather than aiming to be amongst the very best. Actually I think probably the 55mm f1.8 and 35mm f2.8 qualify and although I haven't tried it maybe the 28mm f2 too. I'd like to see more though.
I guess some processing was done ?? Really like that image. Did you have a d810
Yes I had a d810 and sold it. I won't lie. I do miss it. If I had the money I'd have one again. But he reality is with the size of the sonys I shoot A LOT more. And at the end of the day that's what it all about.
No that's straight out of camera
Yes a little work done in Lightroom. The dynamic range is wonderful.
Yes I had a d810 and sold it. I won't lie. I do miss it. If I had the money I'd have one again. But he reality is with the size of the sonys I shoot A LOT more. And at the end of the day that's what it all about.
Interesting pal. What your current lens set up as I have been in two mind for a while. As I'm like you thinking going smaller to,take it out more.
Twist and snerkler be along soon lol
Interesting pal. What your current lens set up as I have been in two mind for a while. As I'm like you thinking going smaller to,take it out more.
Twist and snerkler be along soon lol
Whys that then?
Stop talking about it and asking everyone else, just do it or dont!!!!
That the reason why lol as you know I been a pain
Just Buy it Rookies, its a different world...apart from dust on the sensor bah humbug
What does OSS mean?Yes it likely upset the original A7 series owners but Sony need to go after the Professional's who are long-term hard core Nikon & Canon users, having a trio of high quality f2.8 lenses without OSS could mean they are lighter, smaller and better IQ than the rivals.... worth the risk in my opinion.
What does OSS mean?
No it doesn't.
What does OSS mean?
Yes very sure.Are you sure?![]()
I'm debating getting a 35 f2.8 lens if I wanna go small. Any good?Are you sure?![]()
Yes very sure.
I'm debating getting a 35 f2.8 lens if I wanna go small. Any good?
Youre wrong. I was giving him something to relate to, he uses Canon, can you see that everyone except you got that and replied similarly. I highly doubt he wanted to know what the acronym meant.
Don't go saying its IS someone might go buying a lens with IS and it wont fit the camera without an adapter. Its OSS for a reason, Sony call it Optical Steady Shot and always have.
Now youre just being silly. I can see how it stumped everyone else who posted.
Really? I never knew that.