Sangoma
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 2,951
- Name
- Steve, Coventry, England
- Edit My Images
- Yes
That is exactly how I felt. I was being made out to be someone who had been in prison- a liar- a fraudster - in deep debt- .also wanted to know about any other insurances we had such as household insurance. With that she demanded to know which company that had nothing to do with my claim and I didn't even have the camera on the house insurance. So I quoted the data protection act to her and issues of confientuallity. She refused to accept a phone number of the company that I first went to who removed the SD cards and not the repairers. That would have proved she was the liar as she "assumed" it was the repaires that removed the card. She claimed she ,on enquiring with that company, that is what she was told. So I too contacted them and they never said anything like that just quoted the repair report
Ok I accept there must be certain questions to answer so it is not a false claim, but to virtually call you a criminal is something else.
I didn't realise others had been treated the same way as per examples above until I checked.
so far it has been hell but I have an idea up my sleeve.
Next time if there is one I am going to say my old company legal advisors suggest I get a satisfactory outcome within 14days. Failure to do so would incur adding £100 per day from date of notification until the claim was sttled
You can be sure that in the policy wording there will be a clause that means if you have two policies that cover the same item, the liability will be shared.
My cameras are covered on my home contents policy, if I had a separate policy to cover the camera, the two companies would want details of the other, and they have every right to those details.
I can also see the logic for the in-depth questions, as the card got stuck in the camera, but at that point the camera was not damaged, it just had a card stuck in it.
Of course you can choose not to answer, however that will obviously slow things down, as they work on scripts, and any blanks have to be filled or resolved before it can progress.
I do agree though that on the surface, you have not received satisfactory service overall.