GadgetObsessed
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 36
- Edit My Images
- No
I mainly take pictures of the family together with some general outdoor scenery/buildings shots.
I currently have the following lenses for my Sony A6000:
Sony 16-50 Power Zoom
Sony 18-200 Original not the LE
Sony 28-70 FE
I use the 16-50 when I want to carry the camera around for the day and the 18-200 when I need the range e.g. shooting kids at school events.
Although I am generally happy with the 16-50 I do sometimes notice its poorer performance. (My current copy of this lens is good at wider FL but has noticeable issues as you get closer to 50mm.)
The 18-200 is generally a reasonably good performer with no real problems - but it is bulky with the A6000.
I did try the Sony 50mm f1.8. This was wonderfully sharp and I loved the shallow DOF. However, I found 50mm to be just too limiting for general use and because of this I ended up selling it on.
I bought the 28-70 to see how it would compare as these seem to be one of the cheapest E-mount lenses to buy second hand. (About £170 to £200 on Ebay.)
What I notice is that it provides better sharpness all round i.e. the corners are excellent, and slightly better contrast.
So for family shots I now prefer to use this lens.
However, it has made me wonder if would I get even better performance and wore flexibility by having the wider range if I switch to the 1670 Zeiss lens?
Would the 16-70 provide me with any better performance than the 28-70 FE?
I currently have the following lenses for my Sony A6000:
Sony 16-50 Power Zoom
Sony 18-200 Original not the LE
Sony 28-70 FE
I use the 16-50 when I want to carry the camera around for the day and the 18-200 when I need the range e.g. shooting kids at school events.
Although I am generally happy with the 16-50 I do sometimes notice its poorer performance. (My current copy of this lens is good at wider FL but has noticeable issues as you get closer to 50mm.)
The 18-200 is generally a reasonably good performer with no real problems - but it is bulky with the A6000.
I did try the Sony 50mm f1.8. This was wonderfully sharp and I loved the shallow DOF. However, I found 50mm to be just too limiting for general use and because of this I ended up selling it on.
I bought the 28-70 to see how it would compare as these seem to be one of the cheapest E-mount lenses to buy second hand. (About £170 to £200 on Ebay.)
What I notice is that it provides better sharpness all round i.e. the corners are excellent, and slightly better contrast.
So for family shots I now prefer to use this lens.
However, it has made me wonder if would I get even better performance and wore flexibility by having the wider range if I switch to the 1670 Zeiss lens?
Would the 16-70 provide me with any better performance than the 28-70 FE?