So there will be a royal wedding next year, any takers?

You're kidding, right? We'll be paying for this, you don't honestly think the Windsors will put their hands in their pockets for any of it, do you? I mean they applied for a grant (designed for schools, hospitals and low income families) to pay for the heating in their palaces.

Bear in mind the Queen has a personal fortune in excess of £300million....


Ah! This was edited as I posted my first reply... no probs, but ... the 'palaces' are maintained for the state as are many other properties. They have to be maintained, looked after. They are part of the heritage that we can all enjoy :cool: You say they applied? but did they receive the grant and how much was it? ... I'm not actually a royalist per se! but I do believe it's up to the country to look after it's historical structures, gardens or whatever :)

Because they never pay, for anything - see my edit to the previous post, re the heating grant.

Graham I posted before your edit :cool: but to say they never pay for anything is a bit rubbish .... IMHO, of course :D
 
Ah! This was edited as I posted my first reply... no probs, but ... the 'palaces' are maintained for the state as are many other properties. They have to be maintained, looked after. They are part of the heritage that we can all enjoy :cool: You say they applied? but did they receive the grant and how much was it? ... I'm not actually a royalist per se! but I do believe it's up to the country to look after it's historical structures, gardens or whatever :)

No, the application was refused

Graham I posted before your edit :cool: but to say they never pay for anything is a bit rubbish .... IMHO, of course :D

Name some things they pay for, you know, travel,food, holidays,that sort of thing......

Remember, until 1993 they didn't even pay tax, they had to be shamed into doing that
 
It costs the UK taxpayers 62p each to fund the royals, that was £38.2 million last year......

If that's true? then so what? .... 62p a year to pay for the Royal family is a damn site better value than paying for the rest of the ****** (!) .... The Royal family generate billions of revenue for the country ...... money well spent IMHO ;)
 
They'll have to get the invites out soon, or all the foreign bigwigs royals and celebs will be booked up and not able too attend.
Wonder when mine will arrive.......
 
Ah! This was edited as I posted my first reply... no probs, but ... the 'palaces' are maintained for the state as are many other properties. They have to be maintained, looked after. They are part of the heritage that we can all enjoy :cool: You say they applied? but did they receive the grant and how much was it? ... I'm not actually a royalist per se! but I do believe it's up to the country to look after it's historical structures, gardens or whatever :)



Graham I posted before your edit :cool: but to say they never pay for anything is a bit rubbish .... IMHO, of course :D

Exactly how can I enjoy buck house? couriously they turned me away when I try to walk in.
 
If that's true? then so what? .... 62p a year to pay for the Royal family is a damn site better value than paying for the rest of the ****** (!) .... The Royal family generate billions of revenue for the country ...... money well spent IMHO ;)


I'd rather have the 62p :D
 
It costs the UK taxpayers 62p each to fund the royals, that was £38.2 million last year......

A whole whopping £38.2m last year you say?

The Figures for the Crown Estate Revenue returns for 2010:

Revenue by estate 2010: £million (excluding service charges)

* A Urban estate – 221.4
* B Marine estate – 46.6
* C Rural estate – 25.1
* D Windsor estate – 6.6



Now what was that about a tiny £38.2 million?
 
A whole whopping £38.2m last year you say?

The Figures for the Crown Estate Revenue returns for 2010:

Revenue by estate 2010: £million (excluding service charges)

* A Urban estate – 221.4
* B Marine estate – 46.6
* C Rural estate – 25.1
* D Windsor estate – 6.6



Now what was that about a tiny £38.2 million?

One minor point, that's the money the property, which belongs to the nation, made, not what the Windsors contributed to the economy...;)
 
Last edited:
Those may be the Revenue figures, but is that the profit, and besides I daresay that involved a good few people who are probably glad that they are employed by the Estates.
 
No, the application was refused



Name some things they pay for, you know, travel,food, holidays,that sort of thing......

A touch of a 'strawman' argument here, perhaps you should say what they haven't paid for! .......Actually, they do pay for travel, food and holidays :shrug: perhaps your confusing state business with personal business :thinking:

Remember, until 1993 they didn't even pay tax, they had to be shamed into doing that

So, they pay tax ....... Sounds to me like they are contributing quite a lot then? ;)
 
A touch of a 'strawman' argument here, perhaps you should say what they haven't paid for! .......Actually, they do pay for travel, food and holidays :shrug: perhaps your confusing state business with personal business :thinking:

I think you'll find that most of their holidays, other than those at royal residences, are paid for by their hosts, yet when the Middletons stayed at on of Charles' properties he sent them a bill for £3k....

So, they pay tax ....... Sounds to me like they are contributing quite a lot then? ;)

Yeah, it would be nice to pay tax and then be able to claim all of your household expenses back :thumbs:
 
One minor point, that's the money the property, which belongs to the nation, made, not what the Windsors contributed to the economy...;)

Nope, that is the revenue from the Crown Estate which belongs to HMQ, but from which the income is passed over to the Treasury in exchange for the Civil List, under an agreement between Parliament and George III and it's confirmed at each Accession. Legally Prince Charles could tell Parliament and the Treasury to poke it when he becomes king.
 
Nope, that is the revenue from the Crown Estate which belongs to HMQ, but from which the income is passed over to the Treasury in exchange for the Civil List, under an agreement between Parliament and George III and it's confirmed at each Accession. Legally Prince Charles could tell Parliament and the Treasury to poke it when he becomes king.


I wouldn't worry about that, Charles will never be king :lol:
 
Retreat to fight another day Graham..............:thumbs:
 
I think you'll find that most of their holidays, other than those at royal residences, are paid for by their hosts, yet when the Middletons stayed at on of Charles' properties he sent them a bill for £3k....



Yeah, it would be nice to pay tax and then be able to claim all of your household expenses back :thumbs:

:lol: If their hosts pay for their holidays .... so what? ..... Do you think they'll be going to Tenerife for a couple of weeks and staying in a hotel after booking it at Thomas Cooke travel :shrug: ...... If I have guests, I don't charge them :shrug: ... not that they'd pay anyway :D

Somehow I doubt Prince Charles or her Maj. puts in a bill for washing their smalls? ...... :D
 
Naww :lol:

"Freedom!!!!".....................:D

Behave, or I'm having another pop at Robert the B! :D

In the words of William Wallace....

mooney.gif
 
:lol: If their hosts pay for their holidays .... so what? ..... Do you think they'll be going to Tenerife for a couple of weeks and staying in a hotel after booking it at Thomas Cooke travel :shrug: ...... If I have guests, I don't charge them :shrug: ... not that they'd pay anyway :D

Somehow I doubt Prince Charles or her Maj. puts in a bill for washing their smalls? ...... :D


Oh, I'm pretty sure they will ;)
 
Well I for one will be there, trying to take better shots than I did when his Mum got married. (And I hope I can still be there when he gets crowned).

Its a funny thing. In other respects I'd be proud if you'd call me a Republican, but when it comes to OUR Royal family I'm a total head held high, chest puffed out ROYALIST! Don't forget that ever since we chopped off the head of a certain King and got Magna Carta signed, they only SERVE with our consent. And serve they do very well usually in my opinion.

If you ever get to meet them and even better chat with them, then I think you'd find most of them "Jolly fine folk". The Queen in particular has the remarkable ability, just like her Mum, to instantly put one at ease when conversing with. Very different to the few seconds sound bites and clips you find in the "Meeeeja".
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Well, all except Chaz. Sorry mate, but your just a nutter! Kind hearted, good bloke may be.............. but still a nutter.:cuckoo:
 
If you are worried about money, then you'd better hope that he does. Have a quick gander on t'interweb as to how much presidents cost!


Oh, I wasn't suggesting that there would be an end to the monarchy, more that his mother doesn't seem too keen to relinquish power to Charles and going by how long-lived his maternal grandmother was there's a fair chance he won't get his turn...
 
Just my opinion but all this kings and queens malarky is medieval nonsense. This is the 21st century and we need to stop living in the past.
Good luck to the pair of them anyway.
 
If you are worried about money, then you'd better hope that he does. Have a quick gander on t'interweb as to how much presidents cost!

At least we don't have to splash out a pile of cash supporting the whole of their extended family. And we get to choose who we want, rather than having some gormless prat who had to get somebody else to pass his A levels for him imposed on us.
 
It costs the UK taxpayers 62p each to fund the royals, that was £38.2 million last year......

You realise that's just a drop in the ocean compared to what they actually bring into the country?

I read that this wedding alone is going to boost the economy by over a billion through tourism etc

EDIT: after reading on I see you have realised this, well, maybe not but it has been pointed out to you :lol:
 
I am awaiting the call - they really should book a chap called KING
 
So when that parasite piloting a helicopter comes to save you when you are stuck in a blizzard on Snowdon,you'll tell him to **** Off.

Oh and his parasite brother who fought in Afghanistan suppose he's a ****** as well,not forgetting the parasite Uncle who risked his life in the Falklands and the Grandfather who fought the Nazi's in WW2 and the Great Great Uncle who died in WW1

And you forgot Mountbatten, he was an uncle wasn't he ? And he kicked 3 barrels out of the Japs in the Far East is WWII.
 
And you forgot Mountbatten, he was an uncle wasn't he ? And he kicked 3 barrels out of the Japs in the Far East is WWII.
With my grandfather Who served along side him- Yes he did kick arse, and yes the Gurkhas even respected him
 
Don't think i'd want to take up valuable space on my memory card,....£80m for a wedding at the taxpayers expense is a damned disgrace when you look at all the cutbacks that have just been announced.

The best thing about the royal family was spitting image :)
 
Don't think i'd want to take up valuable space on my memory card,....£80m for a wedding at the taxpayers expense is a damned disgrace when you look at all the cutbacks that have just been announced.

The best thing about the royal family was spitting image :)

What is disgusting is £16 million compensation (gag money) to 14 so called victims of torture! .... What's the problem? this Country has loads of money! Jeez it can even bail out the Irish banks ..... :shake:
 
Last edited:
Just a thought, as William is a helo pilot why not hold the wedding on one of those aircraft carriers we have with no planes on them? there is cattering staff already there (ships cooks) and the captain can marry them.
It would cost b****r all really, a tank of gas for the chopper, the ex royal yacht britannia could bring out the families (with tourists footing the cost) it would be a lot cheaper than closing half of London and getting police in from everywhere to line the route.
 
Back
Top