Show us yer film shots then!

Some from the 3rd roll of HP5+ through my OM2sp. I will have something different soon! I have superia in the OM2 and legacy pro in the eos 650! ;)


Some of this lot hang around on here!


My boy.


A tree.
 
An old one on slide that I scanned recently



Sagrada Familia
Barcelona, Spain. March 2003

Canon AV-1, Canon FD 50mm f/1.8.
 
Last edited:
a few from the rolls that came in today.

Contax G1, Velvia 100F.

Traitors Gate, Tower of London

aug1.jpg


Canon, Tower of London

aug2.jpg


Cotswold, near source of Thames

aug3.jpg


London


aug4.jpg
 
Last edited:
I know I've messed about and put a frame on it and a title and a sepia tint but I wanted it to look like an old postcard.
Ross Ensign 16-20 on Kodak ASA 400 b&w.

4865704395_c0c3d3e9e1_b.jpg


Does it work?

Cheers

Andy
 
excalibur2 said:
erm is it my eyes or does this shot have uneven development
Click to expand...

Nah, I don't have the diffuser panel for ma scanner so all my scans look that way...

Some HP5, rated at 200 and guesstimated the dev at 8mins in promicol.

4867003518_1484509c1b_z.jpg


4867002942_6d28781be1_z.jpg


4867003252_7347d1a96c_z.jpg


4867003996_ec2d4b592a_z.jpg


Theres been loads of good shots since I last posted here, top stuff.

Sam.
 
Andysnap said:
I know I've messed about and put a frame on it and a title and a sepia tint but I wanted it to look like an old postcard.
Ross Ensign 16-20 on Kodak ASA 400 b&w.

*pic*

Does it work?

Cheers

Andy
Click to expand...

I think I would prefer it sans-sepia and sans-border personally :)
 
Andysnap said:
I know I've messed about and put a frame on it and a title and a sepia tint but I wanted it to look like an old postcard.
Ross Ensign 16-20 on Kodak ASA 400 b&w.

Does it work?

Cheers

Andy
Click to expand...

Looks a little like you've got some more of that pink from the gravestone border, rather than sepia tint to me, Andy...:shrug: There's also a bit of a halo around the headland, if i'm being picky. It does have the right vibe for a old postcard though!.
 
A few old ones I found when digging out my old film kit,years out of date film. D&S at tesco.

All shot on a MTL5B with Kodak CN400.

1.
Photo35_34A.jpg


2.
Photo28_27A.jpg


3.
20100725-Photo33_32A.jpg


Tony
 
Seems strange considering thats where my set were from only half an hour before, 10 years aparts mind.
 
LOL.
I saw yours and I thought "I have some beach shots like that......"
I didn't recognise yours as Portabello mind you. Must have been subliminal.

Tony
 
Andysnap said:
I know I've messed about and put a frame on it and a title and a sepia tint but I wanted it to look like an old postcard.
Ross Ensign 16-20 on Kodak ASA 400 b&w.

4865704395_c0c3d3e9e1_b.jpg


Does it work?

Cheers

Andy
Click to expand...

You know Andy. I am not a fan of the tint here. The photograph itself is great, but the tint does not work for me. It also looks like it has some digital sharpening as opposed to letting the grain do its job. I do like the border and title.
 
Thanks for the comments guys.

BY I think the halo is because the headland was lit by a beam of sunlight but the rest of the image was under cloud, its on the neg so nothing to to with processing. As to the pink, well I've just printed it on A4 and you're right.

Thanks Javier, in the print it doesn't have as obvious a tint but I think I will go back to the original and try a more natural look.

Cheers

Andy
 
Sam, I agree with Javier, great image.

Andy
 
4867288678_fff18c12d2_b.jpg


4867307574_eea48346a6_b.jpg


4867283110_96eff14f6a_b.jpg


4867337260_18c32a5bf6_b.jpg


4866737125_8744c2c5d2_b.jpg


Ricoh GR1
Fuji NPC 160

In loving memory of Amelia Lati
~December 21, 1940-July 26, 2010~
 
Last edited:
not a very interesting shot, but just sharing a frame of cross processed velvia 100f taken a while ago.

4865874444_75dcd1e970_z.jpg
 
RIP and condolences.

OK I've had a re-think and this, apart from a straighten and a tiny levels tweak, is virtually straight from the disc.



I have to say that overall I prefer it. I think I'm still using to many digital thought processes and not allowing the film/lens/camera to do its work.

Andy
 
jgredline said:
All I know is that I sat there staring at this image for quite a few minutes, so this tells me that I like it :)
Click to expand...

Andysnap said:
Sam, I agree with Javier, great image.

Andy
Click to expand...

Cheers :)


Andysnap said:
RIP and condolences.

OK I've had a re-think and this, apart from a straighten and a tiny levels tweak, is virtually straight from the disc.



I have to say that overall I prefer it. I think I'm still using to many digital thought processes and not allowing the film/lens/camera to do its work.

Andy
Click to expand...

I much prefer this version also...

Sam.
 
Andysnap said:
RIP and condolences.

OK I've had a re-think and this, apart from a straighten and a tiny levels tweak, is virtually straight from the disc.



I have to say that overall I prefer it. I think I'm still using to many digital thought processes and not allowing the film/lens/camera to do its work.

Andy
Click to expand...

Definitely prefer it this way Andy :thumbs:

One thing i've found, if you have an image that you feel needs a gentle sharpening, rather than using the usual unsharp mask tools in photoshop, a High-Pass filter layer overlay sharpens the image up without over-emphasising the grain structure. Just one example of differing processes for the 2 media :)
 
Thanks BY nice tip.

Andy
 
Just got a film back today from Tesco. Got speaking to the lad and asked him to do a decent job on them for me. He actually did !!! Scanned them at higher res than normal creating 2mb files.....


1
bwfilm-100.jpg



2
bwfilm-101.jpg



3
bwfilm-102.jpg



4
bwfilm-103.jpg
 
#1 I'd want to lose the house and the distracting sky at the top in a crop.

#4 is great, though. Lovely tonal range.
 
Musicman said:
#1 I'd want to lose the house and the distracting sky at the top in a crop.

#4 is great, though. Lovely tonal range.
Click to expand...

Thanks...

1 tighter crop
bwfilm-100b.jpg



I had tried the tighter crop but Helen wasn't keen.
 
Musicman said:
Respectfully, I'd have to disagree with her :)
Click to expand...

She said "Why do you have to do such a tight crop" which I took to mean she didn't like the crop BUT now she says she likes it so we are all in agreement :)
 
Is posting photos I took in the early 90s cheating on this thread? :suspect:

I did only get round to scanning them recently, if that's any defence.



 
As some of you might know, I've been doing a long term project recording the construction of Renzo Piano's Shard of Glass building at London Bridge since last year. It's going to be the tallest building in western Europe when it's completed in 2012.

I've had a few photos published in a couple of architectural journals, on the architects' web site and for publicity for some of the sub-contractors as a result.

Most of it has been digital, but I did think I wanted to get some 'real' photographs along the way. :)

Here's a few behind-the-times shots from June 23rd, taken with my Canon A-1, using Ilford FP4+. It took a while to get them developed and scanned. There's another colour batch in the can but not yet developed.

There's a few more film shots over the couple of pages following this in my Shard Gallery.

A101_026.jpg


A101_025.jpg


A101_030_002.jpg


A101_034.jpg


A101_036_002.jpg


A101_037.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top