- Messages
- 7,422
- Name
- Not an addick!
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Don't be daft - without Leviticus they'd have no legitimate excuse for oppressing gay people.Yes, we all know they'd prefer the old testament didn't exist.
Don't be daft - without Leviticus they'd have no legitimate excuse for oppressing gay people.Yes, we all know they'd prefer the old testament didn't exist.
There we disagree, the true meaning of being a Christian has nothing to do with the Secular society, non-believers aren't obliged to hold 'Christian' beliefs. The issue is the people who believe themselves to be Christians who don't agree with you.
And that's the crux, those 'Christian' white supremacists would say that you're the one with the wrong Christian values, those people bombing abortion clinics... Etc etc.
But mostly! Why do threads discussing the evil of some Islamic fundamentalists always end up discussing Christianity?
Simply because some 'holier than though' Christian tries to make political gain from the situation. That's what is totally scandalous. I don't really want to belittle anyone's belief, but when people try to promote their superiority because of their choice of mythical being, I'm afraid they've put themselves up for ridicule.
From reading this thread it is obvious the terrorists are wining
![]()
Breivik rambled a lot of incoherent nonsense. Culturally a Christian, but not religiously from what I can see or what he has said.
Fair commentTo be a Christian requires following Jesus Christ and his teachings, you cannot do that in isolation, love for God and neighbour requires action, including following the Bible's command to meet together for worship (Hebrews 10:24,25).
You can lead a good life from your own armchair to some degree but you cannot live a Christian life of following in Jesus' footsteps from your armchair, (disability obviously discounted).
Well the simple answer is look at Jesus' example and teachings and judge which one represents him and hence is a Christian ... to me it's easy, as Jesus said when discussing people's claims, "You will recognize them by their fruits. Are grapes gathered from thornbushes, or figs from thistles?" (Matthew 7:16)
We can argue till the cows come home about who or what is a Christian from a secular viewpoint but from the Bible's viewpoint it is quite clear.
Fair comment
So where does that leave or even categorise ( as we as a nation love labels) your average Joe in the street that doesn't attend Church,
but helps his / her elderly neighbour do their shopping, drop a few quid into some poor homeless chaps or chapess's hat.
Pick's up a fallen person in the street etc etc?
They are obviously not a Christian, as they don't go to Church.
Yes I would do ( have done) all this and the last time I was in church must be nearly 30 years ago.
But I have no desire to measure those people against Jesus' teachings, why should I care? If they say they're Christians, that's your problem not mine, it's up to the church to defend itself (where have we heard this before?)Well the simple answer is look at Jesus' example and teachings and judge which one represents him and hence is a Christian ... to me it's easy, as Jesus said when discussing people's claims, "You will recognize them by their fruits. Are grapes gathered from thornbushes, or figs from thistles?" (Matthew 7:16)
We can argue till the cows come home about who or what is a Christian from a secular viewpoint but from the Bible's viewpoint it is quite clear.
Fair comment
So where does that leave or even categorise ( as we as a nation love labels) your average Joe in the street that doesn't attend Church,
but helps his / her elderly neighbour do their shopping, drop a few quid into some poor homeless chaps or chapess's hat.
Pick's up a fallen person in the street etc etc?
They are obviously not a Christian, as they don't go to Church.
Yes I would do ( have done) all this and the last time I was in church must be nearly 30 years ago.
If you don't care, why are you posting in response?But I have no desire to measure those people against Jesus' teachings, why should I care? If they say they're Christians, that's your problem not mine, it's up to the church to defend itself (where have we heard this before?)
Interesting Thanks for the point of viewhowever it is the 'loving of God with your whole mind, soul and strength' that is missing.
As an after thought, not all Christians are necessarily good people then.and indeed may well be a considerably better person than some who call themselves a Christian and go to church
If you don't care, why are you posting in response?
My place is booked, I am under no illusions as far as that goesYou'd label them a jolly decent fellow. Destined to eternal damnation.
As an after thought, not all Christians are necessarily good people then.
My place is booked, I am under no illusions as far as that goes![]()
So, you are saying exactly what MOST Muslims are saying about ISIL - being criticised on here for saying it?
GAME, SET AND MATCH
CHECKMATE
Old testament
I'm a Jedi.![]()
But they slot right into the definition.You are not paying attention are you!
Not all who call themselves Christian are good people.
In my opinion absolutely, and history has demonstrated that many do exactly that. Many a murderer was "such a nice man and a good Christian"As an after thought, not all Christians are necessarily good people then.
I could be a right b*****d but as long as I go to church and listen intently to what the Vicar is saying, read the bible pray each night, etc etc.
I could call my self a Christian?
To be a Christian requires following Jesus Christ and his teachings, you cannot do that in isolation, love for God and neighbour requires action, including following the Bible's command to meet together for worship (Hebrews 10:24,25).
You can lead a good life from your own armchair to some degree but you cannot live a Christian life of following in Jesus' footsteps from your armchair, (disability obviously discounted).
I'm pointing out the errors of the hypocrites, I'm not trying to attack your faith, but some people who are full of hatred who align themselves with it. Which, as I say is ironic given the original theme of the thread.
Like many, I consider myself to have a decent set of morals which I can hold onto without recourse to any mythical beings, unfortunately for your religion, some people who have disgusting morals will lean on your God as justification for their beliefs and actions. It's not my fault this happens, and my pointing it out shouldn't reflect on you if you're a 'good Christian'.![]()
Ok, I give in and stand corrected. Sigh.You are not paying attention are you!
Not all who call themselves Christian are good people.
New Testament
I'm a part time Zoarostrian (can't even spell it) mainly in the summer when it is warm and the time is right for a BBQ.
No they don't ... the footsteps of Jesus rememberBut they slot right into the definition.
You couldn't be more wrong. Islamic State are devoted to Islam, they carry the Quran everywhere, recite it, preach it, set up a state according to sharia, martyr themselves for Islam and ultimately want to bring on the end of the world.
Breivik's religious views were about as incoherent as the LRA that people like to equate IS with. A false analogy.
Straight into an Old Testament quote.
And you wonder why we see this the way we do?
I'm confused, I need to lie downNo they don't ... the footsteps of Jesus remember![]()
With Queen playing in the background?![]()
I'm confused, I need to lie down
( I'm not taking the p*** btw I'm truly interested )
You are not paying attention are you!
Not all who call themselves Christian are good people.
My apologies, I'm not an expert on ancient mythology.Um .. no the Book of Hebrews was written by the Apostle Paul and is part of the New Testament![]()
Freddy was their best known follower - may or may not have been true - what a talent though - who cares about religion!!!!
The point isn't whether it agrees with your interpretation or not, the point is that they Christian, Muslim, Bhudist whatever believe they are and interpret it as that they are. As such, especially with a large following it becomes a dangerous mix that is highly likely to attract more and more to their interpretation.Well yes, I can call myself a good photographer but it doesn't mean that I am ... it's the same with people, some call themselves Christian but their actions prove that they are not ... others call themselves Muslim but their actions prove that they are not ... and so on.
The fact that someone justifies what they do by claiming belief in God doesn't fool anyone, least of all God ... however what it does do is misrepresent God and turn people away from Him with a "well if that's what being a Christian is, I want none of it".
Mum and dadSo who is responsible if an Atheist is a good person?
FFS! will you stop it?He requested a Zoroastrian funeral
Again, trying not to belittle but to understand.
If someone claims to be a Christian and is good, thats due to their religion
If someone claims to be a Christian and is bad, thats not the fault of their religion
If someone claims to be an Atheist and is bad, thats because they have no religion
So who is responsible if an Atheist is a good person?