aye, tony beal are good.
bessel do some too that isn't outrageously *cough*lastolite*cough* priced.
Right first time I used it. (Bessel)
First off I had to use it on carpet today as the hard floor room I normally use was too cold and the heating was not working.
Didnt make too much different on the feet but I can see it causing problems over time, possibly causing the vinyl to stretch in places.
used it without OE it and it came out well, a nice look, for me anyway. I prefer it to the OE look not and depending on set up can get a grey look to it as well which looks nice.
Definitely easier than Muslin if you have the room. and also easier to OE due to no crinkles. (done in a test)
The only problems I could see was some slight bobbles on the back drop, this was probably due to how it was 'hanging' or my poor set up positioning on the bottom not being equal. I am sure its easy enough to sort out!
Are there many benefits or pit falls to having Vinyl?
No, IMO it doesn't have any benefits over paper, except for economy. Paper is smooth, hangs well and is pretty non-reflective. Vinyl can be all of these things too but a lot of the vinyl sold for photography isn't in fact suitable.but is it better than paper??
You may be right, it depends very largely on the quality of the vinyl. When vinyl backgrounds first came out they tended to be fairly decent but expensive.I disagree... Vinyl out wheighs paper on every front. Just hang it right and no probs.
Paper needs replacing/rips/dings far to easy(Ding is a dent in paper)
£200 of vinyl lasted me 5 years. Paper would have cost a fortune to do the same amount in shoots.
Coloured paper fine but for white.... Vinyl all the way. Common sense and practability dictates it's better.
No brainer! No contest!
It's only ok if you do one portrait session a fortnight, but if you are shooting a 1000 a week.........
No, but it would last much longer.So, would a good Vinyl out class paper?