jonoooo125
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 1,373
- Name
- Jon
- Edit My Images
- Yes
Hi guys, just wondering which you would choose, I managed to put off buying anything at the start of last year. But now I’ve saved up and have 2 options around the 6k mark (from Panamoz).
I think the r6iii is the better choice (with the 28-70 f2.0) as I can buy the glass I want and then upgrade the body in a few years as I did this last time when I got the 6D with the lenses and upgraded to the 5div.
But, I’ve seen reviews saying the 28-70 is overkill, which I can believe because it looks huge and I’ve had the EF 24-70 2.8 ii and never once thought “wouldn’t f2 be nice”. And then panamoz have a kit with the r5ii and 24-70 at £4230 at the minute with adaptor ring.
I like the idea of the 28-70 but also open to the idea of an r6iii with a 24-70 too.
I’ll be keeping my ef85 1.2 for now as I don’t have enough to swap all my lenses, I’ll be buying the rf 70-200 with either combo too as the AF looks much more improved along with either body.
It’s mainly family photos, karate competitions, school events. Not professional stuff.
Thank you in advance
I think the r6iii is the better choice (with the 28-70 f2.0) as I can buy the glass I want and then upgrade the body in a few years as I did this last time when I got the 6D with the lenses and upgraded to the 5div.
But, I’ve seen reviews saying the 28-70 is overkill, which I can believe because it looks huge and I’ve had the EF 24-70 2.8 ii and never once thought “wouldn’t f2 be nice”. And then panamoz have a kit with the r5ii and 24-70 at £4230 at the minute with adaptor ring.
I like the idea of the 28-70 but also open to the idea of an r6iii with a 24-70 too.
I’ll be keeping my ef85 1.2 for now as I don’t have enough to swap all my lenses, I’ll be buying the rf 70-200 with either combo too as the AF looks much more improved along with either body.
It’s mainly family photos, karate competitions, school events. Not professional stuff.
Thank you in advance
