out of the two - which do you think you prefer more ?
High and Dry by Adam Bonn, on Flickr

ISO 100,000 by Daniel Cook, on Flickr
ISO 100,000 + Topaz DeNoise by Daniel Cook, on Flickr
ISO 5000 outdoors by Daniel Cook, on Flickr
ISO 32000 by Daniel Cook, on Flickr
ISO 50,000 by Daniel Cook, on FlickrYou're really enjoying that Voigtlander Immo...
An Aires Viscount. If you want more info, try this page: Japan takes over (cjs-classic-cameras.co.uk) There's plenty of other info on line if you look for it.My father in law's (very) old camera.




Yes but the 400bhp probably sounds nicer and has a quicker accelleration...This only shows that at a certain quality level differences do not matter much in real life. The same goes for cars: a 400hp car will not take you twice as fast to your
destination as a 200hp car ...
Yes but the 400bhp probably sounds nicer and has a quicker accelleration...possibly more comfortable too.
I see your post processing in the #2 has a more pronounced halo effect on the trees... were the processed with the same settings or you needed to recover a bit more sky in the second? Do you find you are processing the photos differently?
BTW - your sensor might need a clean (mine did loads of dirt/dust on it - hated clicking dots everywhere at f8+)


www.l-camera-forum.com
www.l-camera-forum.com
heh I was just curious whether they did the same/similar on the halos.Hi, I checked. Both pics got the same treatment in DXO, enhancing contrast and microcontrast. After checking I processed the pics again, everything flat in DXO now:
...
I am not trying to prove or disprove anything. At least I have found that the Lanthar is not a bad lens. And I do not have to throw my other 50s away ... --- )
Looking at You by Adam Bonn, on Flickr
Play! by Daniel Cook, on Flickr
Q2M- Sunny Dogs by Daniel Cook, on FlickrI've borrowed a Leica M10M with 35mm (1st image)
Which 35 did you get? A 35 is the only hole in my lineup now that I have a 50 and 28. I have a tiny Voigtlander Ultron but after getting the 28mm Summicron I have a hankering for Leica glass.
Leica M10 + 35mm 1.4 by Daniel Cook, on Flickr
Leica M10 + 35mm 1.4 by Daniel Cook, on Flickr
Louise - M10M by Daniel Cook, on Flickr
Louise - M10M by Daniel Cook, on Flickr
Louise - M10M by Daniel Cook, on Flickr
Louise - M10M by Daniel Cook, on Flickr
Louise - M10M by Daniel Cook, on Flickr
Louise - M10M by Daniel Cook, on Flickr
Louise - M10M by Daniel Cook, on Flickr
Louise - M10M by Daniel Cook, on Flickr