steveo_mcg
Suspended / Banned
- Messages
- 6,319
- Name
- Steven
- Edit My Images
- Yes
So if that's true (?) the native resolution of such a scanner is less than that of an average dslr ... in which case one might be better off digitally photographing the film images?
Alternatively, if one knew the scanner's native resolution and could choose that for the scan (so that no interpolation occurred), any upsizing could be done post-scan using Photoshop's engine, and the results compared.
At what point do camera lens and film grain respectively become the limiters?
The native resolution is lower (on consumer models) but the recording area is much larger in the case of medium or large format. A good drum scan can still get 12mp of actual detail out of 35mm.
this is worth a read.
https://www.talkphotography.co.uk/threads/36-megapixels-vs-6×7-velvia.571711/

