the problem is good is too expensive no one ever thinks of the working class man
the problem is good is too expensive no one ever thinks of the working class man
Casio it is thenthe problem is good is too expensive no one ever thinks of the working class man
well i would really like 24-70mm or 85mm
well i would really like 24-70mm or 85mm
for that camera, I don't think either of those are great choices. They're great lenses, don't get me wrong but if you want a really high end zoom for a DX body I'd be looks for a second hand 17-55 DX f/2.8. Instead of your 85 f/1.4 I'd either go for the f/1.8 which is much cheaper at around £370, or my preferred option on a DX camera would be the 50 f/1.8 AF-S which can be head sub £150
He has a 50mm f1.8D which is a good lens
If he wants traditional "50mm" the 35mm f2.8D is very good and not expensive
he could,but nowhere has is said he wants thatand as I'm sure you'll note I said very clearly that was what I think.
read above - it is just when I pointed out the same as you, that the 1.8G was a good lens - he responded by saying he had a 1.8D
I did read - its rather irritating when people suggest you haven't. But I just agree with you. For the camera I think the AF-S is a much better lens then the AF-D