Nikon D750 & D780

If I remember correctly, f2.8 with f2 rear defocus worked beautifully with the 105 DC. Helped with the CA too.

On another topic, any good D750 guides/resources to pass an hour or two? Kindle or online, ideally.
 
Last edited:
Well, there's 429 pages right here... Although it covers pretty much everything in the world so you'll probably learn b****r all about your D750 other than which screen protector to buy.

And that David is, despite being very modest, a damn good photographer.

But yes. Screen savers [emoji849]
 
If I remember correctly, f2.8 with f2 rear defocus worked beautifully with the 105 DC. Helped with the CA too.

On another topic, any good D750 guides/resources to pass an hour or two? Kindle or online, ideally.
Yes reading this thread from the start could be quite a laugh, not sure TP comes in Kindle edition though :p
 
If I remember correctly, f2.8 with f2 rear defocus worked beautifully with the 105 DC. Helped with the CA too.

On another topic, any good D750 guides/resources to pass an hour or two? Kindle or online, ideally.
PM sent.
 
Thanks guys. Mainly interested in whether its worth using any of the fancy AF modes (particularly for weddings, I hear face tracking actually works) and getting the most out of the metering. From my initial tests highlight weighted is pretty impressive if you then pull back the shadows.
 
Hush your noise.



He'll have sold up by page 83, he's MUCH worse than me!

I think I was here for 10 pages or so back in the early days, before moving to Sony, or Fuji...I forget!
 
Just bought one of theirs, hope it wasn't the one you were after.

Had the 105 DC before and loved it, but in between then and now I've had the Sony Zeiss 135mm 1.8, which was obscenely good, so interested to see how I get on with this one.

Probably was, but that means I don't have a decision to make :)
 
Nikon party at my place right now!!! (not all mine lol)

20160517_204750_zpsc26ep6oe.jpg


Hope I don't get burgled!
 
Just bought one of theirs, hope it wasn't the one you were after.

Had the 105 DC before and loved it, but in between then and now I've had the Sony Zeiss 135mm 1.8, which was obscenely good, so interested to see how I get on with this one.

It took me ages to get the focus tuned in on my 135 DC.
But now it's set up, it is far and away my favourite lens.
By a long way.
It's razor sharp, focussing is not the quickest, but certainly fast enough for people pictures.
But the way it renders is beautiful.
There is a learning curve with it, but worth persevering with IMHO.
Enjoy your 135 !!
 
JY ,i see your going to Fuji,is this your 1st time and have you decided on which camera ?
Chris, I have had a Fuji before but not with the lenses that I would like this time. I've thought long and hard about this because I love the D750 but I'm fundamentally lazy and the Fuji JPGs are better than the Nikon ones, not sure my limited post skills are getting the best out of my D750. Plus probably a bit of GAS and itching for a change ;)

Getting an X-T1 to go with my X-T10 and going to pair then with some good primes - 16/35/56 I think.
 
Nikon party at my place right now!!! (not all mine lol)

20160517_204750_zpsc26ep6oe.jpg


Hope I don't get burgled!

Where do you live? When are you going out? How long for?
 
It's a fantastic town for photo opportunities. Only had a day cruise to Positano and Ravello, where I'd love to spend a little more time one day.

Here's my efforts:

https://flic.kr/s/aHsjAZTVf3
Lovely set. I have to plan a trip after seeing your album. The last few are from Pompeii I guess
 
Amalfi coast is lovely, just avoid in the peak summer period (I do remember a 40 degree day in Pompeii and cursing the distinct lack of shade from the sun...) Herculaneum is an even better trip than Pompeii IMHO.

Agree with that 100%. We had similar heat in Pompeii, and Hurculaneum is more enjoyable I found. We stayed on the Nastro Azzuro so was close to Sorrento and the Amalfi coast. We even went on a day trip to Capri.
 
Just got a text off the bride - 70-200 has arrived.:D

Only 8 hours till I can have a play... Gonna be a looooong day. :(
Great. VRII?
 
Spent few house trying to choose between the 28mm and 35mm and here is this mornings outcome.

Both very similar is size and weight with the 28 being a tad longer and thicker. Both seem to produce excellent image quality and snappy to focus.

Focal length wise the difference is a step forward/backward.

28mm has nano coating, 35mm has ED glass.

Both built like most 1.8g series, nothing spectacular but solid enough! Both have some noises within the lenses - almost like slight element movement. Nothing major.

So nothing technical what so ever to the below shots - done on a timer, lens is same distance from camera both times.

Noted that both lenses have very close focus ability.

Images below show field of view and then 100% crop, 28mm first then 35mm.

Both 1/10 second, iso200, f1.8.

Nikon 28mm vs 35mm f1.8g test by Justin Akehurst, on Flickr

Nikon 28mm vs 35mm f1.8g test by Justin Akehurst, on Flickr

Nikon 28mm vs 35mm f1.8g test by Justin Akehurst, on Flickr

Nikon 28mm vs 35mm f1.8g test by Justin Akehurst, on Flickr
 
Hmm 28mm needs some micro adjust I'd say - front focusing slightly, I'd expect it to be sharper than that.
 
D750 performed admirably at another big event yesterday but I ended up with quite a nasty sore spot on my middle finger from the grip.... I blame the weight of the 24-70 :D
 
Was just gonna say that the 35 looks sharper.

At 1/10 you may get camera movement from the shutter, was you in LV?

Was on table on timer lol

Tried again and think it was more equal. Could have been bit of movement or light change from me standing up.
 
Back
Top